This article written by Sheri Fink is a captivating read. The introduction made me sit up in my seat and lean in to read more of the story.

From the very beginning, she completely takes the reader and pulls their interest in the details of the story. Writer Sheri Fink is clearly a master of using less is more and doing a remarkable job at illustrating the facts of the story. As a reader, I was fascinated and could not put the article down. I was shocked by the words and the way the story is presented makes me feel terrible about what occurred.

I do not agree with the approach that Anna Pou and colleagues used as conditions worsened after Katrina. I think it was unnecessary and more options should have been considered for the lives that was lossed.

It is a tragedy and the article was written to demonstrate all sides of the story. Anna Pou may have helped passed three laws, but it does not seem in align with the common good. I appreciate this assignment to read this article and the chance to become aware of this story.