Joe Gould’s Secret

Joe Mitchell’s account of the eccentric man that is Joe Gould is a trip to read. The writer’s writing style is very modern, easygoing and thoroughly detailed. An example of this is evident in his first profile of Joe Gould, Professor Sea Gull:

“Gould is a night wanderer, and he has put down descriptions of dreadful things he has seen on dark New York streets—descriptions, for example, of the herds of big gray rats that come out in the hours before dawn in some neighborhoods of the lower east Side and Harlem and unconcernedly walk the sidewalks”

Mitchell’s long sentence is a journey to Gould’s world, full of details and whimsies that not only describe the man’s environment, but the man’s personality, as well. Despite his long sentences, Mitchell has control. He doesn’t leave the reader astray and lost, but instead, he keeps them interested and immersed.

I wouldn’t refer to Mitchell’s writing as dated, but it is timeless. It is an interesting type of writing that takes both from journalistic and literary style. The journalistic writing comes from his detailed descriptions of Gould’s appearance, history, and the place he resides in. Mitchell’s literary voice comes through the way he lays down these descriptions in a style that almost reads like a novel. Joe Gould almost seems like a character from a fictional story, and a very interesting one at that. The story could be considered as feature writing if it weren’t for the overly specific details that somewhat leads me to question Mitchell’s approach in obtaining them.

Mitchell’s two profiles show Gould in two different lights. In the first profile, Professor Sea Gull, Mitchell describes Gould through the surface, such as his physical appearance, the tone of his voice, his attitude towards others and the details that Mitchell took from Gould as truth. Mitchell is also absent from this first profile. In the second profile, Joe Gould’s Secret, Mitchell digs further down the surface of the eccentric man through his own eyes. For the first time, Mitchell used the word, “I” to refer to his own personal experience of being with Gould. It puts not only Gould’s true personality into perspective, but his relationship to the writer, as well. His second profile, oddly enough, made Joe Gould a real person, as opposed to a legendary character in a fictional story.

The fictional “oral history” that Gould had made up to create his own identity is not a surprise to me. It almost reminds me of Jay Gatsby from The Great Gatsby, with the impressive way he tried to recreate himself through lies. It is heartbreaking on Mitchell’s part to have his trust broken, but it does show clear-cut honesty in his writing.

Posted in Joseph Mitchell | Tagged | Comments Off on Joe Gould’s Secret

Protected: The Queen of Washington Square Dog Run

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in Story Queries | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Protected: The Queen of Washington Square Dog Run

Protected: Joe Gould’s Secret

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in Joseph Mitchell | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Protected: Joe Gould’s Secret

New Inspiration for Eric Orr

Eric Orr

Eric Orr sat at a wooden fold up table in his living room. His quick and then suddenly slow sharpie pen strokes created an echo that traveled throughout his Parkchester apartment. He sketched a version of Rapper Max Robot, a comic book character he created back in 1986. Despite Orr’s artistic safe haven being his home, he may make a change to his creative environment.

Orr grew up in Parkchester. A true Bronx native, he has lived there for 41 years. The neighborhood, he said, nurtured him as an artist. “The Metropolitan Oval is great I normally sit there and take in the environment and get inspiration from the people and I have always created right here in this apartment.,” said Orr.

He started out as a graffiti artist and was one of the few people to work with Keith Haring. In the early 80s, he created logos for various Hip Hop acts such as, Jazzy Jay, Afrika Bambaataa, Zulu Nation, and Lord Finesse. During this period, Orr created Rapper Max Robot, the first Hip Hop comic book character. Now 54 years old, Orr’s work today still consists of art and design.

His art allowed him to work for major record companies such as Jive, MCA and Uni. He designed items for the New Zealand based D.J. software company Serato and is going to New Zealand in November to paint a Mural for the company’s 15 year anniversary. “I will also be attending the upcoming Comic Con at the Jacob Javitz Center to promote Rapper Max Robot,” said Orr.

“I attribute walking with an open mind and taking in everything around me as my way of gaining inspiration,” said Orr. Open mindedness is a value Orr cherishes and he is disappointed at what he views as closed mindedness taking a toll in his community.

“When I first moved to Parkchester, the population was made up of whites and Blacks with a few Hispanics,”said Orr. There has been an influx of different minorities and demographics have shifted to a larger number of people from Hispanic and middle eastern decent from the previous black and white dominance. According to the Social Explorer, Hispanics make up a total of 39 percent of the population followed by African Americans at 20 percent. Over the past ten years, there was an increase of people migrating from Bangladesh who now make up about 15 percent of the population.

“Tolerance is a major issue in the area. We have families coming from different parts of the world and we need to learn their culture and be more understanding. They also need to be more understanding of our culture and what was here before they came,” said Orr. A series of hate crimes has plagued the Bangladeshi community. According to The Daily News, the most recent attack occurred back in August 2013 when a cab driver was attacked leaving his mosque in the Parkchester area. Incidents like this are what Orr refers to as closed mindedness reminding him of the judgmental prejudices that still exist in America.

Despite these incidents, his faith in the neighborhood remains. “I learned when I was in school the more banks your community has the more economically sound it is. We have 6 banks in the neighborhood. If they start closing then we should be concerned,” said Orr. While he loves his childhood neighborhood, he thinks it is time for a change. “I would like a change of environment and to be closer to a body of water,” said Orr. He cites water as being an inspiration to him.

As a result of working with Serato, Orr travels back and forth between the U.S. and New Zealand spending six months here and six months there. Among other things, he received a commission by Sky City, the owners of the Pin Needle skyscraper, to teach workshops to children in New Zealand. He is thinking about moving. “I love Parkchester, I love New York, but there is not enough water change, not enough culture change for me and that’s what I like about New Zealand. It’s on the other side of the world and doesn’t have the same mind set as us,” said Orr.

photo (1)

Posted in Profiles | Tagged , , | Comments Off on New Inspiration for Eric Orr

Nancy Stark

Nancy Stark sits patiently in Raoul's, waiting for SoHo bar patrons to pay her a visit.

Nancy Stark sits patiently in Raoul’s, waiting for SoHo bar patrons to pay her a visit.

A gaunt woman sits in a corner of 180 Prince Street in SoHo. Her unruly silver hair hasn’t surrendered all its ebony, her black shirt is adorned with golden buttons. A black choker lines her neck. Her bony hands shuffle a set of tarot cards. Above her head hangs one of her husband’s artworks: an orange-washed painting of a man in a turban.

There is only one table on the second floor of 180 Prince Street. It is reserved for Nancy Stark, the restaurant’s resident tarot card-reader. Stark, 77, has been conducting tarot card and palm readings over the heads of Raoul’s Restaurant patrons for 24 years. She has watched SoHo evolve. Her lens has been her perch above the restaurant.

She finishes up a reading with a young woman who had come to see her from the bar below. They exchange a handshake-ridden “thank you.”

“But I’m not good with dates,” Stark said over the light of a single votive sitting on her table large enough for a dinner party of one.

Raoul’s, a famed French bistro to the businessman and a cherished local niche to the SoHo resident, recently celebrated their 43rd anniversary.

“I have been married over 30 years. I don’t know exactly how many years, but it’s been over 30,” said Stark of her husband, Barry. He is a retired architect, now a painter and poet.

Nancy Stark emigrated to from Chile to New York at age 13. Her father was already in Manhattan, prompting her family to follow. Her family is full of “spiritualists,” says Stark.

A graduate of Cooper Union in the East Village, wife and mother of one son, Stark has been reading palms and conducting tarot card readings for 48 years. Keep in mind her “dates” disclaimer.

On the recently implemented hike in Cooper Union tuition for students entering in 2014, Stark expressed grief. “It’s criminal. It was one of the last schools that you could enter based on merit alone. It’s ridiculous,” she said.

Another change has struck Stark as an astrologist. Her clientele has shifted in the past two and a half decades.

“It’s funny,” said Stark. Her hands dance atop the white tablecloth, never still.

“I used to get a lot of young women. Now I get a lot more mothers and men asking questions about business, their personal life. We’re all human. Without love, we are nothing. Love, health, and material security.”

The employees of Raoul’s, especially the longtime staff, know Nancy.

“She is a cat lover, and she’s a longtime vegetarian,” said server Catherine.

Working late on a Monday night, Catherine described Nancy’s quirks.

“She’ll greet me like this,” Catherine said before throwing her palms up in the air like that of a kitten and clasping her fingers up and down, meowing.

On SoHo, Nancy is blunt about the decline of what was once a vibrant neighborhood. Although a resident of Chelsea, Stark travels down to SoHo Sunday through Wednesday to settle at her table up the winding staircase of Raoul’s.

“In the 90’s, [Raoul’s] was popping. Jumping. The parties were everywhere. When the money was plentiful, the neighborhood was wild. There were so many personalities, so many celebrities. I met some,” said Stark. “There was a lot of action. It was all very exciting… very, very exciting. A lot of that joie de vivre.”

“Now,” Stark said as her hands dance downward in the air, “it’s not as wild. I think after September 11th, that was the demarcation. It was a very sobering time. Since then, it’s just been a sobering time. But it has been for the whole economy, hasn’t it been?”

Stark believes that SoHo has gone through a maturation that may be a depression, reflected largely in the economy.

Nancy spends Thursday afternoons at a yoga class in Central Park, and Friday nights out to dinner with her grandchildren.

At 11:30, Nancy packs up and goes home. She will usually finish at 11 o’clock, making exceptions only when a customer calls in advance.

“I take a cab,” Nancy said, her folder of fliers in hand. The fliers are full of previous customers’ testimonies and positive claims about Nancy’s readings.

“Coming down here is one thing, but I take a cab when I go home.”

 

Posted in Audio, Multimedia, Profiles | Tagged , | Comments Off on Nancy Stark

Protected: Washington Heights Profile: Mike

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in Profiles | Tagged | Comments Off on Protected: Washington Heights Profile: Mike

Joe Gould’s secret

Joseph Mitchell’s writing style is a bit descriptive; as you read along you cant help but feel like he’s very detailed with everything he’s trying to get across to the readers. More so the first version seems like a feature story, and the language is quite different from the second one, but all in all both are feature stories.

I also feel like Mitchell was impressed with Gould on the first reading, whereas in the second reading he was much more critical of him, setting up the reader to be surprised with the end. While we can say that his style is wordy, Mitchell definitely gives us example of how writing can be used to get messages across in a powerful way, with his use of nifty words are different, the spots he uses them in makes it in a way that It could be used today and still possibly work.

In the end I wasn’t really surprised with the truth about the oral history, after all, something that’s longer than the bible is pretty long itself. In addition, to claim that this “oral history” was much more informative than the books that have been passed down history seems really unrealistic; as well as saying it was composed of over 20,000 conversations. The fact though that he did not reveal the truth about the oral history not existing, tells me that he did not due it out of respect for Gould and perhaps because of his own writer’s block.

-Abel Ramirez

Posted in Joseph Mitchell | Comments Off on Joe Gould’s secret

Joe Gould’s Secret

In writing a profile of the curiously eccentric Bohemian Joe Gould, author Joseph Mitchell used two very different tactics. In his first profile, titled Professor Sea Gull, Mitchell’s writing style is fluid, artistic, formal, and full of dated vocabulary and terminology. “The Oral History is a great hodgepodge and a kitchen midden of hearsay, a repository of jabber, an omnium- gatherum of bushwa, gab, palaver, hogwash, flapdoodle…”, writes Mitchell. He also had a habit of connecting a series of ideas with “and”, a technique that may have crossed the line of rambling. For example, Mitchell writes, “In addition, he was nonsensical and bumptious and inquisitive and gossipy and mocking and sarcastic and scurrilous.” All in all, the first profile is a stiffly written biography about a unique man from a stranger’s point of view: curious, respectful, interested, and crammed with unique quotes from Gould that allow the reader to truly get a sense of the man.

In his second profile, written over 20 years later, Joseph Mitchell begins as he had written the first, yet eventually completely diverts from his plan. The beginning seems to mimic the original, as Mitchell juxtaposed uncomfortably short sentences (“On occasion, he stole.”) with impossibly and comically long sentences, simply toying with the reader:

“All through the years, nevertheless, a long succession of men and women gave him old clothes and small sums of money and bought him meals and drinks and paid for his lodging and invited him to parties and to weekends in the country and helped him get such things as glasses and false teeth, or otherwise took an interest-some because they thought he was entertaining, some because they felt sorry for him, some because they regarded him as sentimentally as a relic of the Village in their youth, some because they enjoyed looking down on him, some for reasons that they themselves probably weren’t at all sure of, and some because they believed that a book he had been working on for many years might possibly turn out to be a good book, even a great one, and wanted to encourage him to continue working on it.” (39)

After he finished lulling his readers to sleep and have them simply skim over paragraphs of writing, Mitchell abruptly changes to a fast paced, casual, and modern first person narrative. In it, not only does Mitchell fully describe and record Joe Gould’s life, but he also lends the reader a window into his personality, and his life. While Gould was once an attraction worthy of an audience, he is now a human being with a history, feelings and emotions. The incredibly detailed narratives written verbatim contain the background and clarification needed to present the random quotes from the first narrative. It is here that Mitchell openly expresses his opinion of Gould as the story progresses, rapidly shifting from curiosity, to sympathy, to respect, to resentment, and then gradually back to admiration. He clearly wrote the second profile which revealed the truth of the phony Oral History to illustrate a man’s struggle for identity, and to pay homage to a dear friend who had captured his loyalty. Although this rambling, overly- detailed, and at times incoherent piece is clearly not feature writing, its idiosyncrasies and touching storyline make it a classic.

Posted in Joseph Mitchell | Tagged | Comments Off on Joe Gould’s Secret

Joe Gould’s Secret Response

Joseph Mitchell’s is very descriptive in his writing and paints a clear picture of Joe Gould. Mitchell’s first draft Professor Sea Gull is written as a feature story. The writing is descriptive, but the language in this piece is dated at times. “Once in a while he trudges up to Harlem and goes to one of the establishments known as “Extensions of Heavens” that are operated by followers of Father Divime, the Negro evangelist,” is an example of Mitchell’s use of dated language. His references to African Americans, prices of things and describing Gould as a Bohemian keep the writing trapped in a time period.

The language in Mitchell’s rewrite, Joe Gould’s Secret, is more lively and timeless. The overall flow of the rewrite is that of a novel and not a basic feature. The descriptions are more compelling and the piece is organized different from Professor Sea Gull. This allowed Mitchell to develop Gould in a chronological order with more detail about his background. The reorganization further allowed the reader to connect more with Gould’s character. As a result, Joe Gould’s Secret is longer than the original. In this case, longer is better because the writing is more contemporary and easier to read through. The downside is that the essence of the time period that is written becomes blurred, but the reader is reassured by the mention of dates and specific historical events.

Mitchell’s writing clearly matured in between the original and the rewrite. He seem to have learned more about Gould the second time around. Mitchell’s opinion is clear because both pieces seem to be written from his point of view. Joe Gould’s Secret contains more of his opinion than his original. Mitchell’s uses first person in the rewrite to personally describe Gould. In Professor Gould, he is more neutral describing the situation in third person, but not from specific personal opinion. This is what makes Joe Gould’s secret more of a novel or modern feature.

Posted in Joseph Mitchell | Tagged , | Comments Off on Joe Gould’s Secret Response

Joe Gould–

Joseph Mitchell’s writing style is not outdated or old fashioned. His writing style doesn’t seem to have aged because his writing style is very descriptive and informative. He allows his readers to get a detailed sense of images and how the world operated back then. Still today the different environments mentioned in Mitchell’s book exist in many communities. Stories like Gould’s are still shared through Mitchell’s novel but aren’t heard from everyone experiencing the same situation.

It is true that Gould is lost throughout the novel trying to find him-self and his book he writes is of his own adventure, a diary that he can relate to and symbolizes meaning to him.  Mitchell clearly admires Joseph Gould because of his bravery and attitude of not caring of what others thought of him. He wasn’t stopped or didn’t stop his Joe Gould’s fund because of his fear of what people would think of him. Although he has come from a wealthy family, he chooses to live by the streets and let his own faith lead him.

Some may think of this as foolish and reckless behavior but this didn’t stop Gould from what he’d tell people about his Oral history book that didn’t exist to begin with. He was careless about actions and didn’t want responsibility. I feel that Mitchell admired that so he wanted to make his feature story on Joe Gould as interesting as it was because of this appreciation of coming across such an interesting character.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Joe Gould–