The concept of “good-for-you, brussel sprouts journalism” indicates the emergence of a more serious type of niche media. I assume Carr intentionally chose brussel sprouts over say, simply leafy greens; the former is generally associated with stricter tendencies, such as the cliched portrayal of parents instructing their children to eat the allotted portion on their plates. As such, this form of media appears to cater to those with both sincere and serious interests. The publication will certainly lose out on readership if it chooses to not adopt strategies to broaden its appeal/coverage. That, however, is the essence of niche media.
Carr noticeably delves into the topic at hand, highlighting some of the caveats associated with this specific type of business venture. It appears that the article is well-geared towards our class, as a significant portion of our curriculum has focused on the untimely (and equally unpleasant) upheaval in the respective industry. I attribute our understanding of the topics at hand, the subject of the article and the underlying issue, to our class interactions. Those that have not been as well informed may find Carr’s article on emerging niche media to be equally niche-directed.
Carr’s subtle bias is evident elsewhere in his coverage, particularly in his casual neglect to remotely chastize the publication’s decision to not even mention the heinously tragic occurrence. At times, the article feels reminiscent of a fan letter, perhaps even a call to arms. He is undoubtedly familiar with the changing face of journalism, and likely holds his own beliefs regarding its sustainable future. Perhaps an article exemplifying new practices to test the waters?