Non-Racist or Anti-Racist? Hidden Truths

Learn more about implicit bias using the 2015 annual review by the Kirwin Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity at Ohio State University.  The institute offers insights into implicit bias for those who wish to understand how we socially reproduce racism or sexism as individuals and groups without thinking.

A Few Key Characteristics of Implicit Biases:

  • Implicit biases are pervasive.  Everyone possesses them, even people with avowed commitments to impartiality such as judges.
  • Implicit and explicit biases are related but distinct mental constructs.  They are not mutually exclusive and may even reinforce each other.
  • The implicit associations we hold do not necessarily align with our declared beliefs or even reflect stances we would explicitly endorse.
  • We generally tend to hold implicit biases that favor our own ingroup, though research has shown that we can still hold implicit biases against our ingroup.
  • Implicit biases are malleable.  Our brains are incredibly complex, and the implicit associations that we have formed can be gradually unlearned through a variety of debiasing techniques.

http://kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/researchandstrategicinitiatives/implicit-bias-review/

The Kirwin Institute has collaborated with MTV to offer young folk an implicit bias test and a 10-day fast. Check their website here: http://www.lookdifferent.org/what-can-i-do/implicit-association-test.

CyberRacism and Social Inequality

“Racial Internet Literacy” from JessieNYC on Vimeo.
Daniels, J. (2012, September 4). “Racial Internet Literacy” (Vimeo). Retrieved January 13, 2016, from https://vimeo.com/48821485

Cyber Racism and Social Inequality Online

Today we are reading “Race and Racism in Internet Studies: A Review and Critique” (2012) by CUNY Grad Center professor and sociology Jessie Daniels, who is a colleague and acquaintance.  The article appeared in New Media & Society, a great journal that features many articles about new media — always on, asynchronous media online.

This video reminds me of the influence of my mentor Mike Wesch’s YouTube videos on this kind of digital storytelling. How can we implement this in a short time in my winter intercession course? That is what I’ll ask my students today.  I want them to start contributing to this blog for the next 10 days.

Notice the similarity between Daniel’s video on Racial Internet Literacy (2012) from Vimeo and The Machine is Us/ing Us (2007) from YouTube:

Wesch, M. (2007, March 8). The Machine is Us/ing Us (Final Version). Retrieved January 13, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g

Growing Apart; Working Together Online

If the sociological study of social inequality tells us that connecting our individual problems, seeing the connections between your life and mine as well as how social structures and ideologies keep us trapped in the welter of our daily experience, as C. Wright Mills articulated, then doing collaborative storytelling online about racism might help.

The final project in the course requires students to share what they are learning with at elast 20 people. I’ve always been interested in going public with our public learning. In the age of social media, institutions of higher learning can be hubs broadcasting social justice and change. But what does it take to work together and give up the neoliberalist notion that meritocracy is succeeding alone?