How it all began…

How can one imagine that New York was once a city with a beaver on its seal? Anyone living in the 21st century has to put-up a very different mindset to try to understand what was happening on the island in 1600’s. What is most interesting about the settlement period is the relationship to the land. Dutch were fighting with natives for the space both sides considered theirs. It could be compared with the gang fights nowadays; where groups fight for a space they could as easily share. Natives certainly thought that land is everyone’s possession before Dutch bureaucrats came to convince them otherwise. This brings the more general question of ownership. Who owns Manahatta? Henry Hudson (and so the Dutch) who “discovered” the land or the natives who inhabited it since centuries? Or maybe the Duke of York, who received it for his birthday? One has to make the step to declare ownership in order to raise the question of what’s whose. The natives saw no reason to make the island “officially” theirs. They might have thought that there will always be a path of land for their villages; but how history has showed; there is never enough space for power. Moreover, the King had the last say on how to govern that land so what was happening in Manhattan depended more on remote decisions than on local ones. For example, the decision to transfer Manhattan from Dutch authority to English authority reached the inhabitants months after it was made. The first New Yorkers were dependent on politics that they didn’t relate to.

It is not so surprising to find out that NY had great coffee-houses and taverns. Any place that is inhabited by a diversity of nations and cultures produces great places to meet. Today’s NY is the same on this aspect. Many people from many cultures come and meet during the night in the greatest clubs, bars and restaurants that NY has to offer. Another similarity from then to now is that any “new comer” willing to work is welcomed to move here [at least before the economic meltdown] as long as he respects the others.

Posted in Readings | Tagged | Comments Off on How it all began…

Mannahatta/Manhattan

The Mannahatta Project is one of the best projects about geography and cities that was ever conceived. It is visually shocking and fascinating.  It is such a dramatical difference between NYC 400 years ago and now, that the contemporary population the the island should never forget where we are coming from.

A visit to the exhibition reminds you of many aspects of the island that you never considered. First of all, it reminded me that indeed it is an island. My usual walking through NY doesn’t involve the crossing of a bridge. When I have the leisure to walk on the waterfront, I believe it is a river I see that just separates me from the Queens. So I omitted to really conceptualize that Manhattan is an island as Hawaii is an island.

Manhattan was a natural environment not so long ago. The fauna and flora changed dramatically since then; NYC became a totally man-made environment. There is a piece of designed wilderness in the center of it (Central Park) but besides that the visual environment has turned from green to gray. There are no raccoons left in my neighborhood – Murray Hill – but you can still se some in Central Park if you are lucky (late nights are the best time).

Nevertheless, New York seems to remain an eco-system of a new kind: a system where humans are dictating the rules.

400 years doesn’t appear to be much for so many things to happen. The documentary wonderfully showed how each generation and group of people that lived on the island shaped its destiny. I wonder how the post-9/11 generation would change the way we inhabit Manhattan? How will my neighborhood look in 50 years? Will Murray Hill become the new Chelsea (or else)? How will my neighborhood look in 400 years when New York would celebrate its 800th anniversary?

Thinking about my neighborhood I realized how big Manhattan is compared with the world I deal with directly. My world could be summarized in a 5 block radius. This is my home: the place where I find food and shelter (ecological definition of home) and the place where I find comfort and habit (: my definition of home). I think each New Yorker has a 5 blocks home, even if they sleep in a 100 square feet apartment.

Looking at all the aspects of life in Manhattan – the diversity, the huge transit of people, the social gap, the access etc… – I think that they are certainly unique to this city. I lived in many cities since i am a child, but none seemed to me as natural as NYC. By natural I mean that all the things Manhattan is, seem to me obvious and genuine. There is no master-plan behind them. Maybe there is some sort of plan, but it is made out of a multitude of individual plans and so it is organic.

My last remark was about water. New York was completely dependent on water for commerce and transportation when it all started. They had a huge maritime parade, and that made me laugh because today it won’t be the event of the year. We look at water in a very different way today. Is a mean of relaxation (with the beaches and waterfronts). It also seems decorative. It is definitely more pleasant to live in a city by the water, It s entertaining too, with tourists going on tours and locals parting on yachts. We do not see the water as fundamental; but we wouldn’t be here if the ocean was not here too.

Posted in Field Visit | Comments Off on Mannahatta/Manhattan