Ta-Nehisi Coates is an award-winning writer and journalist known for weaving personal and collective life stories into sharp critiques of US history and politics. Through memoir, essays, and cultural commentary, he exposes how racism, inequality, and historical memory shape Black life in the United States and beyond.
See 3:00-10:00
Central Argument & Conceptual Framework
Coates explains that the long delay before his first trip to Africa was connected to a whole body of writing—a canon created by European and European American thinkers and writers. He describes this canon as an “arsenal” of histories, essays, novels, ethnographies, plays, and scholarly works. These texts didn’t invent white supremacy, but they served as its syllabus, its foundation.
This body of writing wasn’t just about justifying slavery to the enslavers themselves. It was also designed to convince many others—the slave drivers and hunters, the ship captains, the politicians, the clergy, and even everyday people who may not have cared deeply about the enslaved but could still see and hear their suffering. For such a massive system of exploitation, a massive theory was needed. And at the core of that theory was a single claim: that Africans were hardly human at all.
***
Coates contrasts this white supremacist education with the way he was raised in a Black militant family that followed the “vindicationist tradition.” This meant they worked to reclaim the same history that had been twisted against them and use it as a weapon of resistance. If racist scholars feared the idea of a “Black Egypt,” then vindicationists embraced it—insisting it was true and taking it to its fullest meaning: Black people were not born to be slaves but to be royalty. That’s why they celebrated Black pharaohs and African kingdoms. The goal was to tell a different story than the one forced on them. Coates admits this was a powerful and understandable response, but also says it was one he personally never fully accepted.
Close Reading of a Key Passage or Scene
“Josiah Nott looked out at the world and saw great land masses, and to each he assigned a race and to each race he pinned an exclusive ancestor whose descendants were fit to rule or be ruled. “The grand problem,” he wrote, “is that which involves the common origin of races; for upon [it] hang[s] not only certain religious dogmas, but the more practical question of the equality and perfectibility of races.”
The problem of “common origin” was the problem of “common humanity,” and common humanity invalidated the warrant for African enslavement. For if we were all descended from the same parent, why, then, was one branch made solely for enslavement? This want of a specific warrant to plunder specific humans is as old as “race” itself. In fact, it is the whole reason race was invented. Africans had to either be excised from humanity or cast into the lower reaches to justify their exploitation. But evidence for this banishment has been generally wanting, while proof of the contrary is everywhere around us.”
“My name is not meant simply to evoke a historical entity but to conjure the idea of a Black civilization—which is to say human beings filed away in a hierarchy of nobles, seers, commoners, and slaves who through their construction of monuments, recording of literature, and waging of war can rightfully be considered full human beings. But I think human dignity is in the mind and body and not in stone. And I think the moment we root our worth in castes and kingdoms, in “civilization,” we have accepted the precepts of those whose whole entire legacy is the burning and flooding of a planet. And then we have already lost.”
Coates is skeptical of building pride around images of royalty or grand civilizations. For him, centering identity on pharaohs, kings, or noble titles still relies on the same kind of hierarchy that once justified oppression. He questions the very idea that dignity must come from “civilization” or from proving the greatness of African kingdoms. Instead, he argues that true dignity is found in the everyday lives of Black people—in the power of the mind and the body—not in titles, crowns, or caste systems. In other words, Coates wants to move away from measuring Black worth by standards of empire and instead root it in the humanity and creativity of ordinary people.
Form, Structure, and Medium
By combining memoir, history, and cultural critique in a single essay, Coates turns the medium itself into a kind of dialogue. His direct, personal tone gives the sense of a letter or conversation with the reader. This hybrid form—part life story, part political essay—creates intimacy by showing that big questions about history, race, and identity are always filtered through individual lives and emotions.
He begins with the anticipation of his trip to Dakar, grounding the essay in lived experience, then recalls his upbringing in a Black militant household shaped by the “vindicationist tradition.” From there, he explores how Black revisionist history and revolutionary pride in African kingdoms offered dignity but also left him uneasy, since they relied on the same hierarchies used by white supremacy. Coates weaves in a sharp analysis of how white intellectuals built a canon to justify slavery by denying Africans their humanity and erasing Egypt’s Blackness, showing how those myths still influence his own perceptions. He concludes by urging readers to resist both racist narratives and romanticized counter-myths, while confessing to his own lingering need to see Africa as “home.”
Intertextual & Comparative Analysis
Like Lucille Clifton, who suggests the killing hierarchies of “Babylon,” and Audre Lorde, who exposes and resists the education of the “white fathers,” Coates also wrestles with the problem of inherited ways of seeing. All three highlight how systems of power shape both knowledge and perception, and all three struggle with how to unlearn them. For Coates, this tension surfaces in the emotional dilemmas of “returning” to Africa. He recognizes that the canon of white supremacy still affects how he views Dakar, while at the same time, the Black Power-era celebration of Africa—pharaohs, kingdoms, royalty—also frames his early impressions of Senegal.