This post is about the responses to your in-class writing assignment on October 9th, for which many of you invoked the ghost of Charles Darwin, opining that his theories are what would rescue us from the older ideas or founding myths that are sometimes reflected in religious belief systems. Please note that this is not Joseph Campbell’s conclusion in “The Impact of Science and Myth,” and perhaps you learned this after the group exercise since your written responses differed from those articulated later in the class discussion. I thought it would be helpful to note some of your responses, which reflect a “close reading” of Campbell’s chapter. First, I ask you to consider the following quote from a section of the chapter which appears to smack of Eurocentrism.
In speaking of the claims of superiority which appear in some adherents of monotheistic religions, Joseph Campbell wrote: “. . . today, such claims can no longer be taken seriously by anyone with even a kindergarten education. And in this there is a serious danger. For not only has it always been the way of multitudes to interpret their own symbols literally, but such literally read symbolic forms have always been—and still are, in fact—the supports of their civilizations, the supports of their moral orders, their cohesion, vitality and creative powers. With the loss of them there follows uncertainty . . .” So, is Campbell supporting religious extremism, or is he advocating for a more symbolic reading of religious beliefs, or the resolution of these ideas along with scientific evidence of their “falsehood”?
While I realize that you are busy writing your papers this weekend, please take a moment to research (on the library website and if you wish at “.org” websites) the meaning of “biological determinism.” It lies at the core of Darwin’s idea of species development, and is relevant to our discussion of myth and of Campbell’s resolution to the Apollonian-Dionysian conflict. What does “biological determinism” portend for women? And for men? Jot down your thoughts afterward, as we will need to tackle this conflict, as identified by Campbell, in class on Tuesday, and as represented in our discussion of the Daniel Ogden reading, “Perseus.” (The text assigned for Tuesday’s class.) Continue reading Joseph Campbell’s Lunch Counter: Resolving Ideological Conflicts