What is unique about writings in the social sciences? Discuss this question in light of the reading, and, also, respond to this question based on your experience reading texts related to the social sciences.

In the final section of this reading, “Is Being Undecided Okay?”, the author discusses how ambivalence might be confusing or even frustrating to a reader. In your opinion, does ambivalence weaken or strengthen a piece? Why? If you have an ambivalent answer (you think it weakens and strengthens a piece) then simply discuss the pros and cons of writing with some degree of ambivalence.

What is the point to “starting with what others are saying”? In considering the reading, what are some potential benefits in everyday life to starting with someone else is saying?

What has your approach to summarizing been in the past? How have you been taught to summarize in past classes? What points in this chapter were most helpful (and least helpful)?