Communication in Public Settings

Problem Memorandum

PROBLEM MEMORANDUM

 

TO: Janet Collins, Ph.D. Director, CDC’s National Center for

Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

 

FROM: Joanna Herbaczewska, MPA/ Nursing Administration, Student, Baruch College, School of Public and International Affairs, Hunter – Bellevue Nursing School.

 

SUBJECT: Promote the Health and Well-being of Caregivers

 

DATE: September 8, 2016

 

 

Caregivers as a part of community play important role in the welfare of individuals. Caregivers often take care of frail and ill family members, often forgetting about their own life and health. They need financial, emotional support as well as physical and mental health assessment and interventions. The health care system is mainly focused on patients; caregivers who are slowly burning out can slip by unnoticed until it is too late to ask for help. Furthermore, caregiver’s needs are often overlooked by healthcare providers. They have some support from The National Alliance for Caregivers which lists various resources on its website, including research on the impact of caregiving. Also, there are sites like Caring .com and Family Caregiver Alliance which provide online group support. There is a need for national policy which would provide support for caregivers: emotional, financial and health-wise.

 

The new partnership between CDC and Kimberly-Clark Corporation was created in 2007 to promote the health and well-being of caregivers and implementing evidence-based caregiver interventions in “real-world” settings. (www.cdc.gov/aging/ and www.kimberly-clark.com.) Application of this framework can help practitioners and researchers anticipate pertinent issues as they engage in planning, conducting, or evaluating caregiver intervention programs and policies. However more interventions and support is needed to be done as caregivers provides as much as much as estimated $257–$389 billion worth of unpaid care annually to persons of all ages with disabilities and chronic illness. Still there is no sufficient data to estimate the health of caregivers or health effects of caregiving. Pilot survey was done in North Carolina and analyzed. From the survey researchers learned following:  most of the caregivers were woman (59.1%), the average hours provided for caregiving were estimated about 20.1 hours per week. Most caregivers reported their mental health was “not good” due to caregiver’s burn out. Other issues included: health declining rapidly, financial strain, not enough time for other family members, affects work, reported sustaining an injury while caregiving. (http://www.cdc.gov)

What needs to be done to help caregivers is to create more support for them. Support financially, as they provide free caregiver services is one of the interventions. Furthermore, screening for any health issues for them should be affordable and in timely matter. Providers who take care of ill and older adults should also screen caregivers for any health issues including mental health and provide referral appropriately. Creating more support groups who would direct burn out caregivers to appropriate services. Additionally more research should be done to find out what is needed from healthcare providers and what Healthcare Policy’s should be created to assist caregivers on national level.

 

 

References:

Characteristics and Health of Caregivers and Care Recipients — North Carolina, 2005. (2007, May/June). Retrieved September 13, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Kimberly-Clark Corporation. Assuring Healthy Caregivers, A Public Health Approach toTranslating Research into Practice: The RE-AIM Framework. Neenah, WI: Kimberly-Clark Corporation, 2008. Available at: www.cdc.gov/aging/ and www.kimberly-clark.com.

12 Angry Man

The main person who is suppose to set rules is Forman. It seems that he tries to guide the conversation and keep it in order, but does not work.  The Juror who casts not guilty vote, has doubts regarding the 18 year old being guilty of murder, therefore he states and shows others the doubts regarding witnesses and boys lawyer.

There are no decision rules, each men votes for himself, whether its guilty or not guilty. It seems that they are slowly changing their vote from guilty to not guilty. I think the only rule in the beginning was for the man to vote the same. Once the juror voted not guilty, they were all angry, and each of them tried to push their ideas, vote to the one juror.

Juror who voted not guilty, had clear reasoning and evidence in favor of the boy. He was able to make other jurors see, that there should be reasonable doubt to vote guilty verdict.

Emotions are playing big role. Each of the jurors come with their own bag of experiences and prejudice towards other socioeconomic levels represented by each juror. Each of the jurors had different idea of why the boy was guilty. It seems that leadership in the beginning was foreman, and he was trying to guide all of them to vote specific vote. The juror who voted not guilty became leader, and even though he had all other jurors trying to convince him to change his view, in the end he slowly changed the view of other jurors for verdict not guilty. He did not scream, did not force anybody, he simply states the facts.

Self introduction

Hello my name is Joanna

I am Graduate nursing student, and I am working on my Nursing and Public Administration degree. I am at Baruch at this point my 4th semester.  I am working for Healthfirst Insurance company, I am Fiels Nurse for MLTC long term care, program and I am assessing patients for services they need.

My professional ambitions are to finish this program, and become Nurse Leader. I have more ambitions to go in to teaching new Nurses but that requires more study, and my husband is fed up with me studying, plus I have to rest after the MPA.

Fun details: I have 3 sons- that’s a lot of fun, I am wife, mother, student, nurse. That’s a lot of hats to wear, and that is fun at times to handle everything.