In this article from ABC Nightline, we are introduced into a growing trend of gay Hollywood couples using surrogacy to become parents. Openly gay and now legally married celebrities such as actor Neil Patrick Harris and director Todd Holland have both opted to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to have the perfect surrogacy experience. A popular Los Angeles based surrogacy agency “Growing Generations” says that about 75 percent of their clientele are gay couples. The cost of surrogacy at this agency runs from $125,000 to $200,000. Gay couples can often feel as if they are ‘online shopping’ for egg donors, who must create a profile to include education, ethnicity and occupation as well as a video clip of themselves for potential couples to ‘buy’ their eggs. This agency differs from most in the fact that the egg donor and the surrogate mother must be different women in a hope that the surrogate mother will not become attached to the baby since there is no biological connection. Surrogates must go through psychological screening and preparation to prove she is fit for the job and understands the consequences. However, such a complex process is never easy, especially when insurance and two women with different roles are involved. In the case of director Todd Holland, his surrogate was carrying three viable embryos, and insurance only covered two babies. The insurance company suggested they abort one of the embryos simply to save money. However, the surrogate mother used her own insurance, which was able to pick up the remaining bill and the couple now has three healthy children. This article is interesting in showing how even something such as surrogacy has a ‘top of the line’ agency which advocates for rich and celebrity clients. I feel this article was realistic in that it showed that problems do arise and politics such as insurance coverage often try to undermine the process as a whole. It overall shows surrogacy in a positive light since gay couples are not only able to have the gift of children, but they are able to choose the egg donor and surrogate that best fits their needs.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- y8 happy wheels on 1950s Ads/commercials aimed at Women
- gorzow nieruchomosci on 19th century Household Technology
- When it comes to personal loans USA | 7N4ctwqy on Pros vs Cons of Gay Marriage
- idaho virtual office on Experience of Surrogacy
- Gansu, said construction lax control caused the day of a highspeed 31 kilo | www.louboutinpascher1221magasin.frkalF on Surrogacy in India
Frequent Topics
- 20th century
- 1950s
- Adolescents
- american dream
- anonymous
- birth
- census 2011
- childhood obesity
- children
- children under 2
- chores
- Christian fundamentalist
- commercial
- consumerism
- eugenics
- Family
- female targets
- Foucault
- gay
- Gay Marriage
- guest workers
- home economics
- homosexuality
- Homosexual Warning
- household roles
- Immigrants Hope Their 'American Dream' Isn't Fading
- kitchen
- majority not white
- marketing
- Media & Advertising
- minorities
- motherhood
- New York Times
- privacy
- Pros vs Cons of Gay Marriage
- school
- segmented marketing
- Slavery
- Social Media
- social network
- surrogacy
- television
- us population
- women
Archives
Categories
Meta