School health policy that goes over board.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-04-11/news/ct-met-school-lunch-restrictions-041120110410_1_lunch-food-provider-public-school

The article above is a perfect example of overreaction from schools regarding the obesity epidemic. Essentially, one school principal in Chicago started a policy six years ago that students were not allowed to bring any outside food into school and had to eat only the lunches and breakfasts that the school provided. Her reason was that she believes that parents are either unaware of proper nutrition or that they are irresponsible and let their children eat anything they want.

I believe that, although this policy was started with good intentions, it ultimately has more negative side effects and should be stopped. First, school for younger kids should not be about taking away their freedoms and what they enjoy doing. If recess and lunch are welcome rests during a long day of learning, then this policy basically cuts the children’s break time in half. After all, the article itself said that the school has seen a dropoff in meal participation because the students don’t like the taste of the food. This means that there are some children who would rather go hungry than eat the school’s food, and this cannot be good for learning.

Parents complain that some of the children might be diabetic or that they might be on a gluten-free diet. These parents are complaining that the school is taking away a fundamental freedom, which is to have their children enjoy life or be raised as the parent chooses, not as the school imposes.

Obesity is certainly a problem, and one that parents must be educated on how to prevent. However, for those who acknowledge the risk and still want their children to enjoy a sweet treat, then policies like these go against the basic concept of freedom.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 4 Comments

Lisztomania

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/14/arts/14KELL.html?pagewanted=all

In talking about sexuality last week, I’ve always remembered the repression that women’s sexuality has had over the years, and perhaps centuries. Although it has been recognized more over the past few years, women’s sex drive used to be a mystery and actually something to be feared and treated like a sickness. Like Michel Foucault wrote in The History of Sexuality, women’s libidos were something to be analyzed and deconstructed, and I am reminded of a phenomenon that I saw on the History Channel called Lisztomania.

For those people who don’t know, Franz Liszt was a pianist and composer of classical music in the 1800’s. What makes him special is that he was one of the first rock stars, complete with crazy groupies. Women would follow him around and go into hysterics every time they saw him perform. When he was done smoking his cigars and he threw away the butts, women would actually start fighting over them.

Men would see this kind of behavior and, rather than think that their women were merely sexually stimulated by this famous, talented person, they actually thought they women were physically sick. Men called this sickness Lisztomania, and if you’re thinking that it’s kind of like Beatlemania, where it was accepted that women were just incredibly big fans of the Beatles, then you’re wrong. Lisztomania was an actual medical condition, and governments launched campaigns to try to immunize the public, especially the sick women.

I am very happy that women’s sexuality has been more recognized in the past few decades, and that we’re not treated like sick people when we decide to express it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Lisztomania

Felipe Baeza: An Artist and Activist Living Without Papers

Felipe Baeza, 24, is an undocumented Mexican young man who left his country with his parents when he was 7 year-old. When they first came to the United States they lived in a crowed basement in Chicago. Felipe Baeza’s dream was to become an artist. He was overjoyed to receive a full tuition scholarship for his art school because he knew that his parents did not have money to send him to college.

Mr. Felipe worked in an East Village restaurant. The restaurant was a stepping stone into his dream art career before he graduated with a degree in art from The Cooper Union.  He found a job, but when the employer asked him about his legal status, he was reluctant to tell them he was undocumented. He was frustrated and didn’t know what to do. He couldn’t be the person he wanted to be. He noticed that he had very limited opportunities in the United States. He couldn’t work in any art work, not even to assist an artist. He also was arrested once in Georgia because he was undocumented but later he was released. Many years of study and his art dream became empty and he had to abundant his career. He joined a group of people who are also undocumented to find ways to survive in the United States.

This article is related to the movie “Maid in America” and presents many people who came here to pursue their American dreams, but couldn’t get what they really wanted.  These people do not have equal opportunities because they don’t have a legal status.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Facebook Targeted by Anonymous

In a recent article in businessinsider an impending attack on facebook by the hacktivist group known as Anonymous was discussed. They claim that the reason for the attack on facebook is because of facebook invading the privacy of all its users claiming that facebook knows more about their users than even their own families. This whole internet hacktivism seems to be an interesting topic and although may not have much correlation with how families operate, it would be interesting to see what happens when the largest social network is shut down.

My own take on why Anonymous exists is that this all can stem from growth in segmented marketing and the Patriot Act. Our every key stroke that we make online can be recorded and every site we visit is definitely recorded. I always get freaked out on how accurate the advertisements on facebook are because they all have to do with something that I am interested in. I believe with the addition of the patriot act it has made it easier for the government and corporations who maybe lobby for certain influential parts of the government to monitor the every move of citizens.

Whether it is for security or marketing we are being watched, our friends are being watched, and our families are being watched. Popular culture, which can be decided through segmented marketing, can now possibly be more controlled if we are watched more closely. While I am not a supporter of Anonymous I do feel it would be interesting to see people’s reaction when facebook is shut down for a period of time, just to see if there is any chaos that ensues. Whether it is from people who can’t access their page or from marketers who can’t look at what people are typing to figure out what to sell certain individuals.

-Ryhan Ahmad

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Underground Economy

Domestic work is easier said than done.  Cleaning, cooking, child care; it all may sound easy, but a lot of back breaking hard work and ‘elbow grease’ is put into these tasks.  Especially for the women who do this as a full-time job.  Most domestic workers are illegal immigrants who come to America in search of a better life and do what they can to better their lifestyle here and send money back home to relatives.  Since many of them are in the states illegally, if anything goes wrong with the job or they have an issue with their employers, usually none of these workers speak out against in fear of being sent back home.

But now they have means of being protected, The Domestic Worker’s Bill iof Rights.  The bill offers temporary disability benefits to full-time workers, redress for sexual harrassment in the workplace, time and a half for any overtime work, and consists of eight hour shift per day, with a total of forty hours per week and forty-four hours for live in workers.  Along with domestic workers, the bill also protects housekeepers, nannies, and caretakers of the elderly.

Many employers and employees of domestic work are unaware of the legislation and what it entails.  To spread awareness Ms.Francois, who works for the advocacy of the group Domestic Workers United, went all around the city of New York introducing herself, educating, and handing out pamphlets to domestic workers and nannies about the bill that was passed to ensure their safety and rights as workers.

Posted in Assignment 4 | Comments Off on The Underground Economy

Fight Against Childhood Obesity in Schools

Childhood obesity came up in our class discussions many times. This is probably because it is good example for many discourses we have studied. It is popular topic in media; the growing wave of obesity awareness creates social panic. That is the same concept of over-stressing, exhagerating and presenting old issue as new danger, that we touched upon in Marry Beth Whitehead case and panic around surrogacy.  Educating parents about healthy food choices and demanding from them to feed their children expensive healthy meals perfectly fits into concept of fit/unfit parents. Who gets to decide which family is fit and what BMI index is gradient of healthy child is illustration of Foucault’s concept of power, that is hidden and operates through information and creation of discourses in society. Choice of the standard family, that others should measure up to,  that eat organic, exercise and encourage “healthy” habits in children, is a recreation of middle and upper class ideology.

The 4029tv video about Arkansas school’s fight against childhood obesity is a perfect illustration of Carolyn Vander Schee article and good showcase of discourses listed above.

I especially enjoyed how they through statistics and celebrity name (Michele Obama) in the beginning to  show the importance of the issue. And loved how statistics showed that although obesity rate in that particular school has fallen, it remained the same throughout the state, which was right away used to shift the blame from schools on parents. Only in the very end of the video school nurse acknowledge that many parents can’t afford to buy healthy food, but those are not featured in the video. Instead we get woman from majority group showing example of how she tries hard to get her kids active.

Posted in Assignment 4 | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Minorities in the US becoming the majority

As I watched YouTube video about the latest census reports, I was surprised how tables are turning and minorities becoming the new majority of the US. According to the video, Children 2 years old in the United States are from minority families that make up the majority of the youngest US population”. This is a notable change in the American society. The movie mentions that these children are creating America that will look nothing like a nuclear family looked in the 1950’s when most of the population was white. It will be interesting to study these families and see how they will change American society and in what way? According to the latest census report, “12states have already more minority citizens under the age of five than whites” and another “7 more states are expecting the same change in the decade to come”. These are astonishing numbers I was really surprised to learn that today’s minority of the US population is taking over and rapidly becoming the majority.

I believe, lots of things will be changing in the next couple of decades in the US families and especially how whites will react to this change and what will be the effect of this change. For us, as New Yorker’s, diverse society is a common place. People have learned how to live in one and NY State won’t be as affected by this demographical change as other states will. In my opinion, this would be an important change that sociologists should pay attention to and study changes accordingly.

Posted in Assignment 4 | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Minorities in the US becoming the majority

A Loss of The American Dream for Hispanics

This article here from the Chicago Sun Times explains how the American Dream for Hispanics is becoming a harder and harder thing to achieve. Many people still believe that with enough hard work and determination, anyone, regardless of ethnicity, can place themselves into the comfort of a middle class lifestyle. However, the housing crisis and the recession have taken the greatest toll on the Hispanic community, especially in Chicago. From 2005 to 2009, the net worth, assets minus debt, of Hispanic households fell 66 percent nationwide, according to a Pew Research Center report. As a result, in 2009, the typical Hispanic household had an astonishing $6,325 in wealth while the average white household had $113.149. This is mostly due to the fact that many minorities were given toxic mortgages that could not be repaid during the housing crisis. These statistics are very shocking, since race seems to now determine ones wealth more than before. The middle class seems to be diminishing for minorities, who have to face obstacles such as racism to overcome their class standing. Our country seems to be following the paths of many third world countries where the difference between the rich and the poor are enormous and there is no way out of the class you were born into. This article reminds me of the movie we watched “Maid in America”, where Hispanic women tried desperately to make themselves into the American Dream through hard work with little pay. “The loss of that quintessential American promise is worse than any downgrade of our country’s financial rating” and that cannot be explained through numbers and statistics.

Posted in Assignment 4 | Tagged , | 5 Comments

1 baby – 8 Mothers

I came upon an article of January of this year.  Since we discussed home economics in class, I thought this might apply.  Unlike the Amy Sue Bix article, whose focus was on the equipment program under home economics, this relates more to the branch of child development.  This article came from ABC news and it is called “Practice Babies’: 1 Orphan Raised by 8 Mothers”.  In the time when home economics was becoming quite popular and many women were attending colleges who offered degrees in this field, Cornell University was one of them.  Surprisingly enough Ivy League Cornell offered the Home Economics degree, tuition free for these women.  In 1919 as the final project for graduation for these women they initiated a program called the “practice baby program”.   This required 8 women, up to 12, to care for a baby in an apartment.  Then after 6 weeks the baby would be passed on two another set of women for up to 2 years, when finally they would be adopted.  For those 6 weeks they care for the child 24 hours a day/ 7 days a week, along with other household chores part of their curriculum.  They mention that one of these women might put the baby down for a nap to be later picked up by another woman.  These babies were offered by the welfare program (loaned by orphanages) for the benefit of “science”.

The babies were anonymous since they were infants, but they were all branded with the name Denny Domecon (surname: domestic economy).  After  leaving the child would have no contact with the multiple caregivers or vice versa.  According to Keating, an archivist at Cornell:

“The program was an early testing-ground for consumer research, a “gateway for early education for a different group of women who were so well educated”

The program was later dropped in 1969 when new research pushed society into the benefits of having a primary caregiver.  But that wasn’t before Life magazine ran an article in 1952 glorifying the program.  The apartments were later used as day care center.  I’ve included a video of one of these women caregivers who got their degree in Home Economics from Cornell in 1925.  Also a picture of the article from Life (“The Making of a Home: Cornell Girls Study for Their Big Job.”) Both of these women are the same person.

 

 

Posted in Assignment 4 | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

A View Point on Foucault by Molly Mallin

In this article, “Having Discourse: Talk Matters in Sex and Power, Says Foucault”, the author Anastacia Mott Austin questions some of Foucault’ s beliefs. The author writes about “We Other Victorians” from volume one of Michel Foucault’s, “The History of Sexuality.

From reading Foucault, you can see that he definitley shifts away from the mainstream because he brings up things about sexuality that people don’t usually analyze. Austin talks about how Foucault’ s view is that if repression is an “”injunction to silence”” then by speaking of sex we are deliberately going against authority. Austin then states that Foucault’s point is that is what is significant is not that we as people are repressed, but what we say about it and how we say it determines our power. In “Periodization” (on pg. # 128) Foucault talks about repression and sex. He says, “…. we have too long reduced it to silence.” He is not conservative in his view points of the subject.

Austin also talks about the time of repression (post 16th century) when capitalism was coming into the world. She says, “It makes sense why sex should have to be pushed under the covers, so to speak, so that the most could be gotten out of workers, that they be productive (and reproductive) rather than gluttonous pleasure-seekers.” (pg. # 2- of this article).

I think what she is saying can be related to what we learned in class. This kind of repression may be creating a certain kind of person or product so capitalism is successful. Maybe this was a type of control of society that existed back then where sexuality needs to be secured to have more labor power. This point seems to express a time and era when repression an important subject. This influenced the world of capitalism to some degree. It is also interesting to think about Foucault’s view on power and repression.

Posted in Assignment 4 | 1 Comment