-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- y8 happy wheels on 1950s Ads/commercials aimed at Women
- gorzow nieruchomosci on 19th century Household Technology
- When it comes to personal loans USA | 7N4ctwqy on Pros vs Cons of Gay Marriage
- idaho virtual office on Experience of Surrogacy
- Gansu, said construction lax control caused the day of a highspeed 31 kilo | www.louboutinpascher1221magasin.frkalF on Surrogacy in India
Frequent Topics
- 20th century
- 1950s
- Adolescents
- american dream
- anonymous
- birth
- census 2011
- childhood obesity
- children
- children under 2
- chores
- Christian fundamentalist
- commercial
- consumerism
- eugenics
- Family
- female targets
- Foucault
- gay
- Gay Marriage
- guest workers
- home economics
- homosexuality
- Homosexual Warning
- household roles
- Immigrants Hope Their 'American Dream' Isn't Fading
- kitchen
- majority not white
- marketing
- Media & Advertising
- minorities
- motherhood
- New York Times
- privacy
- Pros vs Cons of Gay Marriage
- school
- segmented marketing
- Slavery
- Social Media
- social network
- surrogacy
- television
- us population
- women
Archives
Categories
Meta
Tag Archives: Pros vs Cons of Gay Marriage
Pros vs Cons of Gay Marriage
The issue of whether gay and lesbian people should be allowed to be legally marry has been debated frequently in recent times as noted in the movie we watched in class on 08/17/2011. One part of the society, the right-wingers who believe that homosexuality is morally wrong and on the other side are gay advocates who argue that their sexual preferences shouldn’t determine whether or not they can marry. To the latter group, gay and lesbian couples should have the same civil rights as heterosexual couples, including the right to legally marry.
Advocates for same-sex marriage purport that to deny a couple, no matter what their sexes, the right to marriage is to deny them a basic civil right. If a couple is unable to marry, they cannot access state and federal benefits that married couples can, such as health care, visitation rights when one partner is in the hospital, joint tax benefits and social security. But the fight for equal rights to marry isn’t just about access to benefits. Gay and lesbian couples are also looking for a way to legally proclaim their love for and commitment to each other in the same public way heterosexual couples have always enjoyed.
On the other side are those who state that, by their very nature, homosexual relationships are promiscuous, and so allowing same-sex marriages would increase the divorce rate. Further, opponents of gay marriage say that it would taint the long-standing tradition of the institution of marriage – that is, marriage between one man and one woman.
Supporters of gay marriage counter with the argument that allowing same-sex marriages to occur the government is simply strengthening the relationship between two people and providing them with some legal and economic security.
Another argument that is usually brought against the issue stems from the belief that the primary, if not only, purpose of marriage is procreation. Since procreation is obviously not possible between a same-sex couple, they argue, these couples should not be allowed to marry. They even take the argument further and say that a homosexual couple’s home is no place to raise children, even if the couple were to adopt.
On the flipside, proponents cite studies that have shown that there are no fundamental differences between children who are raised by homo- or heterosexual parents. (Note that many states allow homosexual couples to adopt children, but not to legally marry).