Life as we know it is changing. And pretty quickly. There have always been two sides to this. Those who put the blame on ourselves, that we are the root of this rapid change and those who simply believe that it is a natural cycle, that global warming at this rate has always happened in the millions of years of its existence. It’s not as simple at first glance but let’s talk about the elephant in the room. Why should we care? An article dating back to 1882 “Pollution of the Atmosphere” by H.A Phillips touches on the subject of climate change dating back to the late 19th century and an article from New York Times “ Climate Change Is Speeding Toward Catastrophe. The Next Decade Is Crucial, U.N. Panel Says” by Brad Plumer discusses it now in the present. Both authors touch on the same issue/topic with its goal of addressing the audience to spread awareness and educate.
Global warming is one of the most pressing environmental issues that our planet faces today. It is caused by human activities that release greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere, leading to an increase in global temperatures. “From this we may conclude that the increasing pollution of the atmosphere will have a marked influence on the climate of the world”. This was a follow up made by H.A Phillips in response to pace. “Since the year 1854 (as near as I can estimate) there has been burnt 10,000 million tons of coal”. The idea of the pollution impacting this rapid climate has been talked about even dating back to this time where Phillips, among others, inferred this possibility. It is no stranger that global warming was ramped up by the burning of fossil fuels. The gasses trap the heat coming from the sun, resulting in rises in temperature. Because of the increase in temperature, many things have occurred such as the rise in sea levels, wildfires like the ones that are currently happening on the west coast, heatwaves, the list goes on. Phillips then goes on to say “The mountainous regions will be colder, the Arctic regions will be colder, the tropics will be warmer, and throughout the world the nights will be colder, and the days warmer. In the Temperate Zone winter will be colder, and generally differences will be greater, winds, storms, rainfall greater”. Phillips here describes the possible oncoming effects of global warming where one is able to visualize it. Point being is all of these have come true so whats stopping the claims being made now in the present from also coming to fruition. Although a very short reading attached to several others under one article, Phillips used ethos to share facts and used the information gathered by Prof. Tyndall to support his ideas. In doing so he provides his audience with credible and informative details.
Now let’s look at an article written in present times. Brad Plumer here like H.A ,Phillips, uses ethos but differently in his article. While Phillips was talking about the ramifications of global warming in the future , Plumer discusses the possibilities and solutions to combat global warming. In reference to a report made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Plumer states “There is still one last chance to shift course, the new report says. But it would require industrialized nations to join together immediately to slash greenhouse gases roughly in half by 2030 and then stop adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere altogether by the early 2050s”. This claim can be deemed credible and draws the attention of the reader in order to give an understanding of what needs to be done with greenhouse gasses. Limiting the use of fossil fuels has never been an easy task but as stated by Plumer, it must be done by these target years in order to prevent the temperature from rising 2.7 degrees fahrenheit. 2.7 degrees fahrenheit seems very miniscule but can bring upon natural threats. In another quote from Plumer’s article” Many scientists have pointed out that surpassing the 1.5 degree threshold will not mean humanity is doomed. But every fraction of a degree of additional warming is expected to increase the severity of dangers that people around the world face”. Before getting into the context of the quote, you can say Plumer here unlike Phillips uses Pathos to get his point across. His choice of words are meant to strike concern and maybe even fear to the audience. What he also does is alleviate any concern in that same sentence by assuring that it “will not mean humanity is doomed”. Despite this, the dangers are clear that an increase in temperature could mean more rise in sea levels, more wildfires, stronger storms, and humanity would still face these adversities.
Global warming is a significant threat to us, that’s why we should care. The impacts of climate change have serious ramifications on the environment, wildlife and society as we know it. Phillips, despite having a short piece discussing climate change, shows us how ethos was used back in the 19th century to warn and educate his audience. Plumer uses ethos and pathos to address the reader on the negative impacts of global warming but also provides use with various sources that strongly support his ideas. The main point of choosing an article from that far back in time and choosing one in the present was to compare the ideas and reactions of global warming to see what has changed. And to most importantly question, do these points still stand?
Work Cited
PHILLIPS, H.A ” Pollution of the Atmosphere”. Nature 27, 127 (1882)
07 December, 1882
https://www.nature.com/articles/027127c0
Plumer, Brad “Climate Change Is Speeding Toward Catastrophe. The Next Decade Is Crucial, U.N. Panel Says.” New York Times20 March, 2023 https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/20/climate/global-warming-ipcc-earth.html