Logistics of International Reporting
Last week, we talked a lot about the state of press freedom around the world, and about how it should figure into your planning process as a reporter working abroad. That’s just one element you need to plan for. Reporting trips often require a lot of coordination ahead of time: booking flights, booking hotels, hiring fixers, hiring translators, renting a vehicle, securing the right visa, etc.
Accreditation
Get accredited if it is advisable/feasible to do so.
Things to consider:
Expense
Timeframe
Whether or not you’re trying to keep a low profile
Potential consequences for not being accredited (without it, if arrested, some governments may take the opportunity to accuse you of espionage, for instance, or of being a combatant)
Every country has different requirements for visiting journalists. Some will have a clear-cut journalist visa that you have to apply for. Some will require media accreditation only if you’ll be filming, or only in certain regions, or only for certain kinds of stories. Some will charge you for bringing in a lot of camera equipment. In some places, the only viable option is to go as a tourist or sneak over the border. As ever, you’re going to want to rely on your network to advise on the best option for you.
Protect your data and your sources. (We will have an entire class devoted to digital security later in the semester.)
Make sure your phones, laptops, tablets, etc. are password-protected.
Communicate with apps like Signal if you’re discussing anything sensitive.
Be careful what you share on social media.
Travel “naked” if you have a lot of sensitive sources on your phone. No matter how good your encryption, if a foreign government is determined to seize your phone, they’re probably going to do it.
Remember that it’s NOT JUST YOU you’re protecting here. Especially if you’re American, your local sources and fixers will often be far more at risk than you will.
Working With Fixers
“Fixer” is a term that can mean a lot of things. A good fixer is someone who Makes It Happen. They have a good sense of what a journalist’s needs are for a story; they know the right people and can facilitate introductions; they know their way around; they generally deserve a lot of the credit for a successful assignment. Often they are journalists themselves.
Sometimes your fixer will pull double or triple duty as driver/translator; other times you will need to hire someone else to fill these roles. Depending on the story, you might be able to get away with not hiring a fixer at all because a contact at a local NGO or agency is willing to introduce you to sources or give you a lift.
The golden rule of working with fixers is this: Don’t Be An Asshole.
Remember that you are going home after the day or week you’ve spent in their country and company, and that they will continue to live there. Remember that any stupid decision you make doesn’t just endanger you; it endangers them, and it likely endangers them many times over. Local journalists tend to be killed and imprisoned at a much higher rate than foreign correspondents.
And pay them a fair rate. Find out what the going rate is (it can be anywhere from $50 to $400 a day depending on where you are) and clear it with whoever’s handling your expenses (and advocate on behalf of your fixer if you’re told it’s too high).
“Fixing” the Journalist-Fixer Relationship
What we found is that the dynamic of a deep-pocketed foreign reporter hiring a local journalist in an often-poorer country, to do his or her bidding, has inherent power dynamics that can lead to problems. Some highlights of our findings include:
More than 70 percent of journalists say they never or rarely placed a fixer in immediate danger, while 56 percent of fixers said they were always or often put in danger.
60 percent of journalists state that they never or rarely give fixers credit, while 86 percent of fixers would like credit always (48 percent) or sometimes (38 percent).
About 18 percent of the journalists report asking fixers about their political affiliation often or always, while only 6.6 percent of fixers disclose their political affiliation often or always.
80 percent of fixers report questioning or challenging the editorial focus of a client’s story, while only 44 percent of journalists surveyed report being questioned or challenged by fixers.
Half the journalists say they have been corrected by a fixer, whereas fixers report correcting clients 80 percent of the time.
38 percent of journalists say they never rely on fixers for editorial guidance, while 45 percent of fixers say journalists always rely on them for editorial guidance.
About a third of the fixers identify as “journalist-fixers” and 75 percent of fixers say they have another profession, with fixing only a minor or moderate source of income.
The vast majority (92 percent) of journalists say they find fixers through “word of mouth,” rather than online fixer forums, lists of fixers, or social media. *

What the data could not show, but subsequent interviews indicated, are underlying tensions that often remain hidden in professional interactions. A fixer with more than a quarter century of experience working with one of the American news networks, put it bluntly: “Unfortunately they still look at us as ‘brown’ people with funny accents, and though I have reported and done some of the most important and daring stories for [the network], it is a struggle to get a producer credit. Meanwhile, white kids—years my junior—get their names up [in the credits].”
*Word of mouth often is the best way to find a fixer, but what are some pitfalls of all the foreign journalists who come to a country on an assignment all relying on the same few fixers every time?
Working with translators
Things to consider:
- Gender. You may need a male or female interpreter, depending on the story.
- Accuracy. Especially if you’re working in audio/video, the translator can’t translate until the interview subject is finished talking, lest you ruin the tape; this means it’s it’s unlikely they will be able to provide an exact word-for-word translation in the moment. They will be able to capture the gist enough for you to ask a follow-up question, but you will need to have it fully translated afterward. And if you have an inexperienced translator who isn’t used to working with journalists, you might find that they’re butchering the translation, especially when it comes to emotion.*
- Transparency. I’ve been in situations where it was clear to me that the translator was not telling me everything that was said, or adding something to what I had asked. This isn’t always a bad thing; sometimes a translator will know something you don’t and will be able to frame a question more diplomatically, but there is a risk that their perspective will affect your reporting.
- Tone, emotion, and color. Unless you have an absolutely dynamite translator, you’re going to miss out on some of the nuance of what is said. Don’t be afraid to ask your translator to elaborate if you pick up on body language or a lighthearted moment and feel like you’re missing something. It’s a lot harder to detect bullshit from a source when going through a translator. If you have a really good one, they can help you out with this and let you know if they suspect the subject is lying or evading.
- Distance. Building rapport with an interview subject and drawing them out is one of our main tasks as journalists. It’s a lot harder to do when you have someone acting as your intermediary. It can be tempting to address your questions to the interpreter (“Can you ask her to to talk about xyz?” but I find that when I focus on maintaining eye contact with the interviewee, addressing my questions to them, and finding time for little human moments, I end up with a better interview and more positive interaction.
- Filming. On a practical level, if it’s a video interview, I find it’s often best to have the translator seated in the space next to the camera where you want the subject to look. No matter how much eye contact you try to make, the subject will usually end up addressing their answer to the translator. Try to sit close to them or even slightly behind so that if the subject’s eyes flick back and forth between you, it’s not too obvious.
Poynter: How journalists can work well with interpreters during interviews
*“I went to some village and just about everything had been washed away. I interviewed a man who had lost everything, and tears were coming out of his eyes and he was moving his hands to and fro, and the interpreter said something like, ‘I estimate the damage to my dwelling to be substantial.’”
Finding Sources
If you are planning on working with a fixer, they will often take care of a lot of this for you. But still, if it’s possible, try and reach out to as many potential sources in advance as you can. On a reporting trip, time is precious and efficiency is the name of the game.
You may end up working closely with an NGO or agency. Sometimes this can’t be avoided, but it’s important to be conscious of the dynamic here; ethically, can you report this story while being beholden to a group so intrinsically tied up in the situation?
Protecting Your Gear
Your equipment is your livelihood, so it’s important to make sure that if it gets stolen, confiscated, destroyed, or lost, you have it insured. Even a thousand-dollar theft deductible and a lag time of a month or two before your claim is settled and you can buy new gear (oof, I know) is better than losing everything in one fell swoop and being unable to work.
Camera insurance is not cheap, especially if you’re working in areas the insurers deem to be risky. (I was living in a city that is affectionately nicknamed “Nairobbery” which meant I definitely fell under that category.) There are a lot of options out there; the best deals often change over time and differ from place to place, so shop around and see what your colleagues are doing and how much they’re paying.
For what it’s worth, I used Hays Affinity, purchased through the National Press Photographer’s Association. It cost about $700 to $800 to cover $7,000 to $8,000 worth of equipment for a year. They covered me in Kenya, but any time I traveled anywhere new or added a piece of gear, I had to update them in advance to make sure it would be covered or so they could adjust the premium. It was a pain, but for that one really bad hour of my life after I realized that my fixer had left my camera bag on the side of a dirt road after he emptied out the trunk when we stopped to change a tire, I was very thankful that I had it. (DON’T HIRE CUT-RATE FIXERS, I’M TELLING YOU!)
If you’re going to an actual war zone, there are plans that will cover you for medical care, evacuation, involuntary repatriation, death, etc. Out of consideration for your family if not yourself, make sure you’re covered.
Safety: Be Prepared
Take a hostile environment and/or first aid training if you have the opportunity to do so.
Have the right gear. If body armor is recommended where you’re going, make sure you don’t skimp. It can be difficult to bring this stuff across borders so often there are local journalist organizations where you can find gear to borrow or rent.
There will be a whole class later on in the semester devoted to detailed risk assessments, so stay tuned for a lot more on this topic.
Other Common-Sense Things to Consider
For those of us who aren’t doing frontline reporting or working in countries with repressive regimes, there are still some important items to weigh in advance.
How remote is the assignment? How close will you be to good medical care?
What vaccinations or other precautions are recommended or legally required for the place where you’ll be reporting? (In Tanzania, for instance, you can be denied entry if you don’t have your yellow fever vaccination card.)
What are the roads like where you’re going?
What is the weather going to be like?
What is considered appropriate clothing where you’re going?
What is the internet situation there?
Budgets for these trips are often lean, and news outlets appreciate reporters who can keep costs low. But don’t skimp on certain things: it’s worth it to spend a little more to stay at the hotel that has a backup generator, so you can charge your camera battery, your phone, and your laptop.
Use your network, talk to people who’ve already been there to get some advance street smarts. Don’t be a hero!
Bring snacks. Reporting can be hard work, and people are more likely to make dumb decisions or forget things when they’re hungry.
Asynchronous Assignment
Every September, the Photoville photo festival comes to New York. This year the festival is taking place both online and in person, though the exhibitions are scattered around the city and are all open-air (in a normal year, they’re concentrated under the Brooklyn Bridge and displayed in shipping containers). Many of these photo projects were done by photojournalists working internationally.
Beginning tonight and going through the weekend, there are various events you can register for. Your asynchronous assignment is to register for and attend one Photoville talk/workshop/lecture OR visit one of their exhibitions. You will write a 250 to 300 word blog post describing the experience, or the exhibit, and what you learned. (Ideally, pick something that has some sort of international angle, but if there’s something else that you think is a better fit for your career goals, that’s fine.)
If you attend one of the live online sessions, you must do so in the next three days. (The schedule is
here.) The exhibitions will be available for a much longer period of time. (You can search for the nearest exhibitions to you, by borough,
here.)
Reminder on Due Dates:
The rough draft of your story will be due on Thursday, October 8.
The final draft will be due Thursday, October 22.