Why do we meddle in places that don’t want to be meddled with? It seems much of the United States foreign policy is based on demanding other nations to act multilaterally while the US acts unilaterally. An article published today in the New York Times, “Joe Biden’s China Journey”, recalls a graduation speech Joe Biden made at Fudan University in Shanghai in 2001. Biden asks, “The students of Tiananmen Square, were they patriots or traitors to the People’s Republic of China?” The response he received from one of the students was simple, yet remarkably profound. The student answered, “The students of Tiananmen were heroes of the People’s Republic of China. Senator, change will come to China. But it will be we, the students of Newton, who determine the pace and the direction of that change, and not you or anyone else working on the banks of the Potomac.” 1
In that same trip in 2001, Senator Joe Biden, as the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, welcomed China’s entry to the World Trade Organization. While on his trip to China, Biden states, “The United States welcomes the emergence of a prosperous, integrated China on the global stage, because we expect this is going to be a China that plays by the rules.”1 Biden’s trip at the time was seen as a great success by bringing China into the fold- getting them adopt multilateral policies and to “play by the rules.” As the common saying goes, ‘keep your friends close, and you enemies closer.’ While I would not classify China as a true enemy of the U.S it is evident that Biden knows the potential of that is on the rise. As Vice President, Biden met with Chinese President Xi Jinping repeatedly to establish “a competitive relationship with China without it being a bellicose relationship, without it being a relationship based on force.”1 While I personally may be a bit of a pacifist, it seems like having a trade war evolve into a nuclear war is a futile path. I tend to agree most with one of Biden’s top advisers, Jake Sullivan, who says the United States “should put less focus on trying to slow China down and more emphasis on trying to run faster ourselves.”1
The idea of not being first has become unacceptable to Americans, but I always question, does it really matter? Does a country having higher GDP numbers affect the lives of everyday Americans who simply want to make it to the end of the week and have food on their table? Does spending billions of dollars flying jets over boats in the South China sea put that food on the table? Fareed Zakaria points out in “The Self-Destruction of American Power: Washington Squandered the Unipolar Moment” that the American imperium is dead. It died when we ignored the Powell Doctrine and entered endless wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that were supposed to be swift victories.2 Does anyone truly believe a war with China would be swift, let alone victorious?
- Wong, E. (2020, September 6). Joe Biden’s China Journey. Https://Www.Nytimes.Com/#publisher. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/06/us/politics/biden-china.html
Zakaria, Fareed. “The Self-Destruction of American Power: Washington Squandered the Unipolar Moment.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 98, no. 4, July-Aug. 2019, p. 10+. Gale Academic OneFile, https://link-gale-com.remote.baruch.cuny.edu/apps/doc/A588990634/AONE?u=cuny_baruch&sid=AONE&xid=bc365eec. Accessed 6 Sept. 2020.
Thanks for this blog post, Chris. Clearly, our relationship with China is complicated and fraught. We need each other for global trade, yet we increasingly worry that China is a rising regional hegemon intent on challenging US supremacy. We will discuss China extensively later in the course. — Professor Wallerstein