Collated by Aaron Mayer
World:
As European Migrant Crisis Grows, U.S. Considers Taking In More Syrians
The inconvenient and ugly truth echoes across oceans: the migrant crisis affects us all. This article from The New York Times is just one of many recent publications regarding the swarms of refugees from the Middle East (primarily Syria) seeking asylum in foreign countries. The author, Michael Shear, reports that the White House is considering a readjustment in its quota of immigrants to ease the pressure on more proximal European borders. Shear was reporting effectively because he remained unbiased, and he focused on the critical issue of the split between countries that have granted asylum and those that have not. Personally, I would have liked to see his opinion added to the end of the article, as I sensed he was indeed advocating for the U.S. to welcome more immigrants, and any voice in favor of the morally imperative action would add its weight to the growing urgency for reform.
National:
Apple and Other Tech Companies Tangle With U.S. Over Data Access
A drug-trafficking gun-bearing potential criminal is texting an assumed accomplice, the police want to monitor the texts in real time in order to prevent a crime, but they can’t do so. The culprit? Apple’s iMessaging encryption.
This article highlights the growing tension between tech companies (Microsoft, Apple, Google) that seek to protect the information of their customers, and the government, which is doing its best to uphold the law and stop crimes. It’s an important article because it fosters public discourse about the ever-changing landscape of privacy and surveillance in post-Snowden America. It was reported effectively because it included examples of several tech companies and several governmental agencies clashing in several ways, some of which appear more favorable to the companies and others to the agencies. In this way, the article encourages the reader to explore for his or herself the ticklish questions of just how far the right to privacy extends.
Local (NYC):
A Door-to-Door Push to Get Parents Involved at Struggling Schools
Alas, we still haven’t quite figured out this whole “education” thing. Amidst higher rates of dropouts and lower rates graduation, the de Blasio administration is tackling the issue of education reform by promoting parental involvement in their children’s schooling. The article itself is important because it broadens awareness about the epidemical condition of some NYC schools, and it is effective reporting because it addresses the positive and negative attributes of the $106M plan. People like knowing where their tax dollars are being spent, and articles like this one serve to inform the public and encourage valuable debates.
Thank you, and have a pleasant day.
–Aaron Mayer