This first thing I noticed about Kim Gallon’s essay was her used of the terms “black,” “Africana” and “African American,” in terms of which one is more appropriate to use. This reading informed me that the term “digital humanities” exist. Gallon wrote, “Although work on racial, ethnic, and national difference is emerging in the digital humanities, discussions about the lineage of Black studies within the digital humanities are almost nonexistent.” I honestly don’t know what any of this has to do with the Harlem Renaissance. Maybe it’s related to the Renaissance era because archive literature can be categorized as “black digital humanities.” What is literature? Who is considered human? After reading this with my class group, I am now understand Gallon’s view on how recovering lost Black literature would restore humanity into the Black community.