REVISED: Poison in the Tap: A Rockland County Contamination Resolution?

The people of Rockland County, located in the Hudson River Valley of New York, has been engaged in a battle with its largest water distributor, Veolia Water NY, to combat persistent levels of harmful so-called, “forever chemicals” in its water sources. These chemicals, polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are linked to adverse health effects such as kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid diseases, decreased fertility, decreased immune response, decreased birth weight, and skeletal birth defects. Despite the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) statement that there are no safe levels of PFAS contamination, New York State allows a maximum of 10 parts per trillion for two PFAS compounds, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid, from 2020. Due to concerns about the consequences of unfettered contamination and negligence on the part of community-serving, private water utilities to transparently communicate a coherent treatment action plan, an open letter was sent to then-Governor Andrew Cuomo, spearheaded by advocacy group Rockland Water Coalition and co-signed by over 80 county organizations. The 2020 letter laid out a clear call to action of 7 central demands. In retrospect, this community action is what informs the progress seen today; the paramount catalyst, demanding swift and complete removal of PFAS chemicals from water, transparent communication about contamination and clean-up efforts, thorough testing and publication of results, emphasizing that polluters must be held responsible, that health-care providers must be provided with up-to-date information along with free blood testing to vulnerable populations such as pregnant women. It also suggests class regulation of all PFAS at the state level and vehemently requests legislative support to ban the production of PFAS in non-essential uses.  

However, even for a Fortune Global 500 company like Veolia, the apparent scale of PFAS (a family of more than 4,700 human-made chemicals) amounts to a daunting task; its rampant state is a factor of the observed strength of carbon fluorine bonds and the chemical’s functional value to dozens of industries since its inception in the 1930s. 

The aforementioned chemical qualities have allowed PFAS to assume an environmentally pervasive position. They enter the environment through the many entities that use or produce PFAS by way of industrial discharge. PFAS also leaks as customers use the final products of these industries (including but not limited to textiles, non-stick cookware, personal care products). Finally, as the PFAS-containing products enter landfills, their toxicity can leach into the immediate environment and contaminate water sources. Current scientific understanding also warns that due to its chemical resilience, PFAS has the ability to travel long distances, not explicitly limited to water but also traveling airborne, thus having potential to accumulate in the food chain. 

The most recent update from Dan Shapley, Co-Director of Science-Patrol Program, Hudson Riverkeeper tells us, “about one quarter of the water sources in Rockland County that have been tested exceeds New York States standards in at least one of the tests taken.” 

The impediment to substantial treatment progress is due to the fact that contamination sources are not obvious and identification requires rigorous, time-consuming testing especially in Rockland where the water system isn’t centralized.  “There is a very distributed network of wells spread throughout the county that service and provide drinking water to the 300,000 plus folks,” said Sean Mahar, Executive Deputy Commissioner at New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

The search began with the likes of superfund sites, brownfields, inactive landfills, etc. There was a particular focus on areas of increased firefighter foam usage, which is a significant PFOS contributor therefore all too convenient of a contamination medium. The data collected likely informed a lawsuit against manufacturers of certain firefighting foams, as a first attempt at fulfilling the Coalition’s demand number 4, “Hold polluters accountable” and, as Dan Shapley said, “attempt at trying to get more compensation back to the state for what we’ve had to spend to protect New Yorkers and our legal strategy is very much continuing in that regard as we find more of these instances where we have MCL exceedances or detections of these compounds in the environment.”

Currently, Veolia sells carbon filters on their website but according to Peter Grevatt, CEO of The Water Research Foundation they are not a complete solution. “There are a number of treatment options that concentrate PFAS you’ll hear about granular activated carbon, you might hear about ion exchange resins, they’re very effective at binding PFAS, they don’t destroy PFAS and so the PFAS then still have to be disposed of in some safe manner.” Carol Walczyk, Vice President of Water Quality and Compliance, Veolia acknowledges this pitfall. “Destruction technologies is what everybody really wants but those are still in the lab research stage,” she said,  “We would have to do an extended pilot study to prove that it would work.” 

Based on the scale and technical complexity of addressing PFAS, a foreseeable, complete contamination resolution is unlikely. However, Americans are becoming increasingly cognizant of the nature of combatting PFAS. Incremental progress, historically testing and treating on a source-to-source basis, is expected. As EPA advisement and subsequent enforceable federal/state standards change, Americans are expected to rely on providers like Veolia to wield emerging and successful technologies to ensure safe drinking water swiftly. This article however prioritizes an effort that moves beyond blind reliance. The significant spark in pioneering water standards, a community action consisting of schools, civic, faith, racial justice groups, etc that brought accountability and demanded transparency from the government and provider Veolia alike. From this precedent, Rockland County has built a foundation of intentioned progress, hopefully a trajectory that can be formulaic for the dozens of communities throughout America facing a similar contamination crisis.

Poison in the Tap: A Rockland County Contamination Resolution?

Rockland County, located in the Hudson River Valley of New York, has been engaged in an uphill battle with its largest water distributor, Veolia Water NY (formerly known as Suez Water), to combat persistent levels of harmful and toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in its water sources. Commonly known as “forever chemicals,” PFAS are linked to adverse health effects such as kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid diseases, decreased fertility, decreased immune response, decreased birth weight, and skeletal birth defects. Despite the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) statement that there are no safe levels of PFAS contamination, New York State has set an enforceable maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 parts per trillion (ppt) for two PFAS compounds, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), since 2020. This is a considerable improvement from the previous, egregious MCL of 70 ppt. Due to concerns about the consequences of unfettered contamination and negligence on the part of community-serving, private water utilities to transparently communicate a coherent treatment action plan, an open letter was sent to then-Governor Andrew Cuomo, spearheaded by advocacy group Rockland Water Coalition and co-signed by over 80 county organizations. The 2020 letter laid out a clear call to action of 7 central demands:

  1. Eliminate PFAS chemicals from our water as quickly and comprehensively as possible. 
  2. Keep the public informed about the full extent of the contamination and the clean-up process. 
  3. Test comprehensively and publicly post the results. 
  4. Hold polluters accountable. 
  5. Provide up-to-date information to healthcare providers and free blood testing to vulnerable populations such as pregnant women. 
  6. Regulate all PFAS in drinking water together as a class at the state level. 
  7. Support legislation to ban the production of PFAS in non-essential uses.

In retrospect, the subsequent effects of community pressure on Veolia Water’s efficacy are considerable, though the goals outlined are far from realized. The Coalition’s and the larger community’s efforts have brought clarity to the once jargon-infested yet ubiquitously critical health crisis. The mounting implications of PFAS contamination are unraveling as Veolia and various other organizations are prompted to justify their strategic timelines. 

Perhaps most concerning is the apparent scale of PFAS (a family of more than 4,700 human-made chemicals), its rampant state a factor of its widespread cross-industry functional value since its inception in the 1930s. See Image Below Titled PFAS Sources

The most recent data from Dan Shapley, Co-Director of Science-Patrol Program, Hudson Riverkeeper tells us, “about one quarter of the water sources in Rockland County that have been tested exceeds New York States standards in at least one of the tests taken.” See Map and Key Below Titled Rockland County

The progress towards effective treatment is exacerbated by the fact that contamination sources are not obvious, identification requires rigorous, time-consuming testing especially in Rockland where, “there is a very distributed network of wells spread throughout the county that service and provide drinking water to the 300,000 plus folks,” said Sean Mahar, Executive Deputy Commissioner at New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

Logically, the search began with the likes of superfund sites, brownfields, inactive landfills, etc. There was a particular focus on areas of increased firefighter foam usage, which is a significant PFOS contributor therefore all too convenient of a contamination medium. The data collected likely informed a lawsuit against manufacturers of certain firefighting foams, as a first attempt at fulfilling the Coalition’s demand number 4, “Hold polluters accountable” and, as Dan Shapley said, “attempt at trying to get more compensation back to the state for what we’ve had to spend to protect New Yorkers and our legal strategy is very much continuing in that regard as we find more of these instances where we have MCL exceedances or detections of these compounds in the environment.”

Aspectual to their treatment action plan, simultaneously underway is Veolia’s implementation of granular activated carbon filters (GAC). While GAC filtration systems are sold as a cure-all on Veolia’s website, (https://nywq.veolianorthamerica.com/acting/) Peter Grevatt, CEO of The Water Research Foundation understands that though they are, “very effective at binding PFAS, they don’t destroy PFAS and so the PFAS then still have to be disposed of in some safe manner…” Carol Walczyk, Vice President of Water Quality and Compliance, Veolia understands this pitfall saying, “destruction technologies is what everybody really wants but those are still in the lab research stage…we would have to do an extended pilot study to prove that it would work.” 

Clearly, facing the reality of Rockland’s PFAS contamination requires the community to swallow the extended timeline of its solution; we are actively suffering the unforeseen costs of industrialization and consumerism. Nevertheless, we must continue to advocate alongside organizations like the Rockland Water Coalition which brought accountability to the government and Veolia alike. 

A Contamination Resolution

Rockland, a New York Hudson River Valley county, has been subjected to an uphill battle with its largest distributor, Veolia Water NY, formerly known as Suez Water, in combating persistent levels of harmful, toxic PFAS in their water sources. Veolia Water’s consistent negligence in addressing up-to-date Environmental Protection Agency advisement standards, particularly through their inaction and irresponsible lack of transparency about solution-based plans to combat the chemicals with known linkage to adverse health effects such as kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid disease, decreased fertility, decreased immune response, and decreased birth weight and skeletal birth defects, has been met with significant resistance by over 80 organizations since 2021. Their efforts culminated in a sincere open letter to then-Governor Andrew Cuomo, spearheaded by advocacy group Rockland Water Coalition, that laid out a clear call to action of 7 central demands: 

  1. Eliminate PFAS chemicals from our water as quickly and comprehensively as possible. 
  2. Keep the public informed about the full extent of the contamination and the clean-up process. 
  3. Test comprehensively and publicly post the results. 
  4. Hold polluters accountable. 
  5. Provide up-to-date information to healthcare providers and free blood testing to vulnerable populations such as pregnant women. 
  6. Regulate all PFAS in drinking water together as a class at the state level. 
  7. Support legislation to ban the production of PFAS in non-essential uses.

Since then, the stage and status of Veolia Water’s execution in 2023 has been far from transparent. Although the cleanup has started and some contaminated wells have been pulled offline, completion is said to be delayed until the fall of 2023 because of delays in approval and, unfortunately, routine, ironically predictable supply chain limitations. Sub-sections of Rockland, such as Nyack Village, report that their water department’s treatment plan is being retrofitted to include a system capable of removing PFOA, a variant of PFAS. The Rockland Department of Health is allowing the Nyack Water Department to accomplish this by August 2023. My particular angle will focus on the Coalition’s perception and Rockland community members who are aligned with the call to action on how well their demands from 2021 have been met by the local and state government, as well as by Veolia Water, including their concerns regarding whether these entities will honestly implement solutions to address up-to-date EPA conclusions.

Randall’s Park Trip: Urban Farm Insights

You would be remiss to let the off season fool you. I am glad we had the chance to see the farm, a 40,000 square foot space featuring over a hundred raised beds, two greenhouses, four rice paddies and a fruit tree orchard. Even in the present season, it was impressive to sense/envision the emerging transformation as we come into spring. Beyond the annual output of 3,500 pounds of food, the prudent consideration of the Park Alliance to design the farm to foster parallel learning along with growing filled me with satisfaction. It is perhaps easy for some to overlook the value of outdoor classrooms but it is precisely these sorts of supplemental learning environments especially in cities that incite meaningful, lasting implicit connections and a more personal relationship with the nature of our consumption. As we become increasingly detached from the realities and paradoxically reliant on a complex global food network, programs like Edible Education hosted by the farm alliance that addresses fundamental concepts like soil biodiversity, urban ecosystems, resilient agricultural strategy, composting even healthy eating will inhabit the front lines towards reclaiming a sense of ownership over our nutrition and better stewardship of our miracle planet.

It was a blessing to hear that the program persevered over COVID. The first harvest of the 2021 season yielded, “50 pounds of produce including carrots, chives, spinach…” Ciara Sidwell. Looking forward on March 25 @ 2:00 pm – 3:30 pm the alliance is putting up an exciting event featuring an award-winning Venezuelan Chef and three-time winning contestant of Chopped (Food Network), Adrina Urbina who will be hosting an interactive cooking demo to make a Shaved Veggies Salad comprised of ingredients harvested from the Urban Farm. The farm clearly has a promising future, I wish the alliance decades of success to come.

.