Navigating Growth and Value Investing for New Investors

Introduction to investment strategies

In today’s dynamic financial environment, the vast majority lack familiarity with all the types of investments available. Only 43% of Americans with workplace retirement accounts know all the types of investments in their accounts, while only 38% of those with non-retirement investment accounts know all the types of investments they hold (Issa). Basic understanding must therefore be facilitated by introducing the fundamental concepts of growth and value investing. Once new investors have mastered these fundamentals, they delve further into maximizing the combined merits of defensive and aggressive investors.

Understanding Growth Investing

Segal defines growth investing as: “an investment style and strategy that is focused on increasing an investor’s capital. Growth investors typically invest in growth stocks”. Investors look for companies with strong growth prospects, innovative products or services, and expanding market share. Typically, many technology-based companies turn out to be growth stocks. Segal, Berger and Curry illustrate growth companies including Tesla, Amazon, and Facebook in the current market. Professor Macdonald, as an economic professor at Baruch College, mentions growth investing entails moderating to high risk with a longer time horizon, and performs better in the bull market.

Exploring Value Investing

Hayes, who is a CFA charterholder, defines value investing as: “an investment strategy that involves picking stocks that appear to be trading for less than their intrinsic or book value. Value investors actively ferret out stocks they think the stock market is underestimating”. A typical example of successful value investing is Google’s acquisition of Fitbit, demonstrating the potential for huge profits from overlooked opportunities. Fitbit serves as a typical example of great value stock, which shows how value investors receive their profits from intrinsic value. Caplinger identifies great value stocks as well-established businesses with long histories of success, consistent profitability, stable revenue streams without huge amounts of growth but typically also without big sales contractions, and dividend payments. Generally speaking, value investing features low risk accompanied by relatively low returns. However, value investments allow more tolerance of error compared to growth investments.

Investor’s Personality and Preference

The choice of investment method is related to individual personality and preference. Investors have different attitudes towards investment based on their personality traits and preferences. Graham, the author of The Intelligent Investor, points out two typical types of investors: defensive and enterprising styles. Defensive investors prefer safety and stability. Enterprising investors seek higher returns through active management and opportunistic investment strategies. Defensive investors prefer conservative, low-risk value investments, while enterprising investors prefer high-return growth investments. Jiang lists the Five-Factor Model of Personality:

  • Openness to Experience
  • Conscientiousness
  • Extraversion
  • Agreeableness
  • Neuroticism

In real life, some people are naturally more inclined towards adventurous ventures, displaying higher risk tolerance, while others prefer stability and opt for more conservative investments based on these five elements. A thorough understanding of an investor’s personality incorporates it with investment style to determine the most suitable investment approach for a new investor.

Blending Growth and Value Investing

New investors should consider incorporating elements of growth and value investing into portfolios to diversify risk and capture opportunities in different market conditions. According to Ancheta , investment styles refer to the specific strategies that an investor employs to achieve his or her investment objectives. Choosing the best investment approach depends on a variety of factors, such as current market conditions, investors’ risk tolerance, time horizon and financial goals (Irby). Cronqvist addresses changing investment styles depending on the era, family size, pre-school experience and other factors that influence later educational attainment, income and financial decisions. Berger and Curry mention a blended approach of growth and value investing. Investors take a hybrid approach to investing, rather than focusing solely on growth or value investing strategies. Over the long term, a hybrid approach tends to outperform investors who switch between growth and value investing in an attempt to time the market. By adjusting strategies to suit changing market conditions and individual circumstances, investors can optimize returns while effectively managing risk.

Conclusion: Building a Balanced Portfolio

Having a preliminary understanding of two basic investment approaches, allows more than a half of Americans a better understanding of other investment types. Being aware of the pros and cons of both investment approaches, and a balanced portfolio optimizes returns while managing risk. Constantly adapting your strategy to changing market conditions and individual circumstances is critical to long-term success. By combining elements of both defensive and enterprising investing, an investor can construct a portfolio that seeks to balance stability, income generation and long-term growth potential.

Insight to My Career Path: Actuarial Science

Initially, I experienced confusion regarding my major and future prospects. As I had achieved balanced grades in all subjects in China, I lacked a specific academic interest. This led to significant anxiety when I first arrived in the U.S. and applied to colleges with majors.

I was introduced to actuarial science by my high school calculus teacher, who shared her own experience with the profession. She discovered it while doing her own career planning and was drawn to it partly because of its alphabetical order and partly because of the high salary. Her enthusiasm for the field inspired me to explore it further, and I quickly discovered that it is a challenging and rewarding major. I am confident that pursuing actuarial science will lead to a successful and fulfilling career. I used to wonder why insurance companies sell insurance and conversely why people buy it. Isn’t it obvious that insurance companies would lose money? During my preparation for the SOA exam, I read articles “Risk and Insurance” (Judy Feldman Anderson and Robert L. Brown, 2005) and learned how the insurance industry works: reimbursement amounts are determined by calculating the probability of an event occurring, premiums are collected on a regular basis, and so on. I love math and am very passionate about connecting math to real life situations. Analyzing real-life cases through mathematical models is an exciting and rewarding challenge. This intersection of mathematical rigor and real-world application resonated deeply with my passion for mathematics and inspired my passion for actuarial science. Actuarial science is a major that demands precision and self-discipline. By prioritizing my time and balancing work, life, and exams, I am confident that I made the right choice in selecting actuarial science as my major.

In today’s data-driven era, artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms have the potential to replace traditional actuarial practices. However, individuals will remain indispensable as long as they remain at the forefront of their field and continue to improve their skills. Therefore, I will persevere on this path of actuarial science and maintain the best skill level.