“I feared the war, yes, but I also feared exile.” Tim O’Brien
by hkhoury ~ September 20th, 2010. Filed under: Uncategorized.Tim O’Brien’s “On the Rainy River” takes the reader through an array of emotions. The author shows his fear, embarrassment, confusion, and everything in between. Embarrassment is certainly the most important emotion throughout the story, because for Tim O’Brien, it is the only thing he can pinpoint as a reason to go to war. Sure he is afraid of dying, but he is more afraid of exile, of losing respect, of disobeying the law, and mostly, of the ridicule of his family and himself. He explains that he comes from a very traditional town, and this fuels his fear of shame. O’Brien writes: “All those eyes on me- the town, the whole universe- and I couldn’t risk the embarrassment,” and in doing so, emphasizes the weight he places on his image among his neighbors. His town is his entire universe.
This idea of fearing shame is not one of the ideas we’ve yet to encounter as a reason why men go to war and sacrifice their lives. Freud didn’t consider this reason when explaining his theory of Eros and destruction, and O’Brien has none of the hostile feelings or intentions explained by Clausewitz when considering going to war. He specifically points out that this is not his war to fight because he does not believe in its cause. All he wanted to do was “live the life [he] was born into – a mainstream life…”
Clausewitz also considers courage to be something very different from O’Brien’s idea of courage. To O’Brien, courage was in running, whereas to Clausewitz, courage is “physical courage, or courage in the presence of danger to the person: and next, moral courage, or courage before responsibility; whether it be before the judgment-seat of external authority, or of the inner power, the conscience.” We see, in Clausewitz’ explanation, that courage can come from overcoming fear of judgment, and to O’Brien, courage is the exact opposite.
September 21st, 2010 at 12:22 am
I completely agree with your observation of O’Brien’s idea of courage. To go against not only your family’s but society’s view of war and patriotism takes immense courage. However at the end, family respect and loyalty seems to weigh in more than courage for O’Brien. However, I don’t quite understand your last statement, pertaining to O’Brien believing the opposite of “courage coming from overcoming the fear of judgment.” Do you mean that O’Brien showed courage by leaving his principles behind and fighting a war he didn’t believe in? I’d think that he chose not to go on the courageous route in fear of his family’s disappointment towards him.
September 21st, 2010 at 9:40 am
I enjoyed this response to the text. Concerning your point that Freud, nor Clausewitz discussed fear and shame as a reason to go to war, it may be a little different when you throw in the element of being drafted into a war. Those hostile feelings cant exist, if you dont believe in the cause you’re fighting for. He was aganst the war even before being made to fight it.
As far as his idea of courage, I agree with you completely. The courageous act wasn’t going to fight for your country. It was doing what you believe is right despite the possibility of ridicule and shame. The last line “I was a coward. I went to the war”. I thought this was such a poignant statement. It immediately changed what the whole story meant to me. O’Brien did this with the other text as well. At the end, he calls it a love story and I saw it differently. I love his style of writing.