“In the Field”

by Simona ~ September 22nd, 2010. Filed under: Uncategorized.

In “How to Tell a True War Story,” Tim O’Brien writes that in war stories, the “only certainty is overwhelming ambiguity.”  Funnily enough, once you’ve read that, it’s hard not to apply it to every other story in the book.  On the surface, “In the Field” is about the abrupt death of O’Brien’s fellow soldier and friend, Kiowa, in a shit field.  But as the soldiers scour the field for Kiowa’s body, Lieutenant Jimmy Cross and the others ponder the question of fault and blame in their comrade’s death.

The lieutenant considers his own misjudgment when it came to setting up camp and his responsibility for his men (which he never wanted), how when he writes his letter of condolence to Kiowa’s father, he will praise his son and be straightforward, “apologize point blank. Just admit to the blunders.”  Mitchell Sanders blames the lieutenant as well: “Some lieutenant…camps us in a toilet….ten billion places we could’ve set up last night, the man picks a latrine.”  The soldier who was with Kiowa is dealing with his own guilt, “still remembering how he had killed Kiowa.” It was he who turned on a flashlight in the dark, giving away their presence and causing the ensuing attack: “The flashlight had done it. Like a target shining in the dark.”

But when Jimmy Cross mentally revises his letter to Kiowa’s father, he decides not to apologize, because casualties are a part of war: “It was one of those freak things and the war was full of freaks and nothing could ever change it anyway.”  He feels the need to blame someone or something because a man’s life is over, but there is a laundry list of people and things to blame: the war, those responsible for the war, the enemy, God, the munitions makers, all the way down to Karl Marx or “an old man in Omaha who forgot to vote…A moment of carelessness…carried consequences that lasted forever.”

And then comes the declaration from Norman Bowker : “Nobody’s fault. Everybody’s.”  After reading about Jimmy Cross blame himself, blame everyone else, the young soldier and his flashlight, the shit field, Karl Marx, whoever, whatever, you start to realize that Norman Bowker is right.  It’s not really anyone’s fault because so many different things factor into the moment of Kiowa’s death that it would be impossible to pinpoint just one person or thing. Immediate or over time, you realize that fault and blame when it comes to war is ambiguous.  And you know it’s real.

2 Responses to “In the Field”

  1. Sabrina

    I agree with what you’re saying about the blame being shared by everyone in the story and I also thought that Norman Bowker’s declaration was really powerful. He doesn’t necessarily forgive Azar for his insensitive remarks in the statement but gives him a moment of reprieve through it all the same, accepting some of the responsibility for Kiowa’s death, like everyone including Karl Marx and the old man in Omaha could too.

  2. Connie Tam

    War is definitely ambiguous! Through this story alone, you are able to see all of the different perspective people had on this event. In this story, we see a few people who took the blame for Kiowa’s death. The boy who was with him at the time thought it was his fault because he had made a mistake by turning on his flashlight. Jimmy Cross also blamed himself because he believed that he should of known better and guided everyone to higher grounds. There was a lot of instances where people blamed themselves for Kiowa’s death. On the other hand, if we compare this story to the movie “Jarhead”, there was a specific scene during training when the soldier panicked and got killed in the wires, Staff Sergeant Sykes just kept yelling at the dead soldier and saying that if he had just listened then he wouldn’t be dead. The Sergeant didn’t take any of the blame even though he chose to train them in that dangerous activity.