Friction in War
by Andy Chu ~ September 29th, 2010. Filed under: Uncategorized.Many things happened in Paths of Glory but I would like to focus on something that is related to what we already read in class.
“Friction is the only conception which, in a general way, corresponds to that which distinguishes real war from war on paper.”
The quotation above was taken from one of the paragraphs in Book I, Chapter VII of Clausewitz’s On War. It comes to mind because during a scene in Paths of Glory, the corrupt General Mireau demands that Colonel Dax round up his men for one massive charge and take over the Anthill. When Colonel Dax is confused by the seemingly impossible order, General Mireau makes “rational” calculations that stun both the colonel and myself. A good 5% killed by “our own barrage”…10% more in no man’s land….20% more getting into the wire…and after that, the worst part is “over.” General Mireau explains those odds in a nonchalant manner as if his soldiers are nothing more than numbers. He finishes off by stating that 25% will fall when attempting to take the anthill, “but at least we’ll have the anthill.”
It was sad to see a general, probably many years removed from the battlefield, to stoop to such despicable means of getting a promotion. He clearly ignores the “friction in war” and does not realize that it is easier said than done. As we saw in the movie, things did not go according to plan. What General Mireau believed would happen, the “war on paper,” the systematic takeover of the Anthill, was tossed aside. “That is why we play the game,” a popular phrase in sports, is very fitting for this situation. You never know how friction will affect the outcome of a war. In General Mireau’s case, the enemy artillery was so deadly that his soldiers either found themselves dead, forced to retreat, or too scared to even get out of their trenches.
October 26th, 2010 at 1:19 pm
Your analysis of Generial Mireau and his completely complacent nature to the major issue at hand (that of which, is sending a couple hundred men to pretty much what can be called “suicide”) is very interesting. Friction is definitely something that this movie emphasizes to be the underlying difference between General Mireau and Colonel Dax’s perspective.
I think what striked me the most, was how even after the Movie’s conclusion and Mireau was stripped of his position, his last words were “The man you just stabbed in the back was a soldier.” This just shows us that even after all that has happened, and how Mireau just practically stabbed the back of several hundred men, and risked all of their lives, he still has the nerve to refer to himself as “a soldier” when he has shown he is anything but. Even until the last few minutes of the movie, Mireau has learned nothing, and has stilled complacent to the end.
February 19th, 2012 at 5:38 pm
Gripping!