final project
by alison drew ~ November 30th, 2010. Filed under: Uncategorized.I decided to write about how sports can be considered an allegory for war, specifically baseball. An allegory is defined as “a representation of an abstract or spiritual meaning through concrete or material forms; figurative treatment of one subject under the guise of another,” (-dictionary.com.) In other words, something that can be used to represent something else. In this case, a baseball game can be seen as a war, with each inning being its own battle. The players are the soldiers, and the coaches are the commanders. The first sports were the olympics in Greece, which ceased all struggles between states until the games were over. Men transferred their aggression towards each other in war into games. The Olympics also display nationalism, in that each player represented his home country. This applies to war in that during war, countries display an extra sense of pride and nationalism, just like how fans support and take pride in displaying their favorite teams colors.
I plan to use Delillo’s introduction of Underworld, as well as Clausowitz and Shin Tzu in regards to the Art of War, and war strategies. I also plan on using Freud to interpret the psyches of the players and fans, and how similar they are to soldiers and civilians in war. I also plan on interviewing a few marines to get their point of view on war, on whether or not they view it as a “game.”
December 1st, 2010 at 9:12 pm
When I first started reading this I was really trying to figure out how you were planning on accomplishing this but then I got to the final paragraph and I think it’s a phenomenal idea. I would have never thought to make the connection between the two so it’s definitely a unique idea. I think that a lot of the things that you said towards the end of your post is substantial but just make sure that you stick to that and don’t throw out too many different ideas or ways of interpreting war as a game. It may become a bit much for a 6 page paper.
December 4th, 2010 at 6:17 pm
I agree with Joezette’s point. You may need to scale down the topic a bit and explore two points:
1. the development of game strategy during the Cold War (see DeLillo, but also find others)
2. the rhetoric of wars as games — you can go into video games training, but that might be too much.