Latest News // Tips

The Triumph of Death

by Andy Chu ~ October 29th, 2010

In the prologue before DeLillo’s Underworld, chaos ensues when “the Giants win the pennant” similar to the chaos in Pieter Bruegel’s painting The Triumph of Death. The Giants won and although there are fans that are ecstatic, the Dodgers and their fans are not. As Russ Hodges is shouting through his mic with excitement, Edgar sits quietly with his knowledge of the successful Russian atomic bomb testing. Then there is Cotter who desperately, and successfully, retrieves the baseball, only to be chased by the initially good natured, Bill. Everything is juxtaposed.

The New York Times headlines that was mentioned in class is a perfect visual of the juxtaposition present throughout the story.

The “Triumph of Death” painting itself is also very interesting. When I look at it, it seems as though there was a very lively, jovial party going on and the dead (skeletons) crashed the party. Anyone have any thoughts on what connections all of these things have? And why DeLillo decided to change the prologue’s original title of “Pafko at the Wall” to “The Triumph of Death” instead?

What’s the point? in Gravity’s Rainbow

by joezette.joseph ~ October 28th, 2010

One of the major points/themes of this novel that stand out to me tremendously is the idea of motivation and purpose. In many instances during Gravity’s Rainbow we find characters that have a distorted perception of motive. Many of them fail to grasp the greater picture and do not fully understand their involvement in the war. The passage at the beginning of episode 9 in which Jessica Swanlake is questioning the purpose of the war, her personal role, and the idea of having “peace” show how lost an individual can be at times. This loss of purpose—especially when related to war—bring about questions that I think Pynchon is attempting to convey.

If individuals who are actively involved in the happenings of war fail to understand the purpose of their own action then one can only question the purpose of war itself. The conversation that follows Jessica’s thoughts between Roger Mexico and Edward Pointsman further validates this questioning. These two men stand firm to their opposing sides of theory and practicality—unwilling to bend to the other. They are so enthralled in their studies and findings that the actuality of the situation at hand (war) does not stay present in their minds. Pynchon seems to be asking the reader, is this what war does to us? Individuals become so engaged in their labor and lose all sense of actual purpose, resulting in faulted and in some cases inexistent real motivation.

Adapting to a life you didn’t choose…

by Connie Tam ~ October 27th, 2010

S. was a women held captive during the time of war. A guard invaded her home and brought her along with a group of women into a bus without informing them of where they were going. Before they left, they rounded up a group of men and led them outside to kill them all leaving the women helpless and afraid.

Upon arriving at the camp site, they were put into a room where they slept on the concrete floor not knowing what were to happen to them next.

Finally, they were all giving tasks to perform. “At last, she has some sort of task…She feared idleness, feared she would be spending her days sitting on the concrete floor of the warehouse, waiting to be exchange. That is the easiest way to lose your mind.” This helped time pass by quicker inside of waiting fearfully of what were to become of them which could drive somone to insanity.

Although this is definitely not a life they would choose, eventually they realize that there was nothing they could do. No matter what they would either choose death or to adjust to the situation they were in. They had sleep, a toilet, food and nobody beat them. She had accepted it and knew that was her life right now.

“S. can feel herself adapting. Every day she wakes up to something she now recognises…Before she gets up S. repeats to herself: just let this be a good day. She does not know exactly what good means, perhaps to her at that moment it means not to be exposed to humiliation by the guards. nShe learns quickly to ignore what does not directly concern her, not to think about tomorrow. She has learned that she can cope only with the problems of the here and now.”

While observing the people around her, S. believes that in order to survive, she had to be selfish and invisible. Also, she learns that living in a small environment meant that word got around.

“Everything got around, but the news was unreliable, unconfirmed. Even though it is happening right next to you, you don’t believe it. And even if you do believe it, you cannot swell on it, it would be the end of you. You believe it only if you yourself see it. Perhaps this deliberate blindness is a form of self preservation”

Being in such an isolated place, many people talk and everyone hears about it sooner or later. S. hear about the most outrageous cruelties but it is hard to believe something like this actually happens unless you see it for yourself.

During war, people were forced into lives that they didn’t choose. Men were drafted or killed while women were taken away to work in a unknown place. Since they had no power and couldn’t escape, the only thing they could do is make the best out of  the situation and try their best to adapt to the only lifestyle they could at that moment. They constantly live in fear, so once there is a daily routine set up for them, they know what to expect and becomes content.

DeLillo — to read for next week

by Dr. Sorin ~ October 20th, 2010

DeLillo.Paftko2

Pynchon in The Simpsons.

by maggiewong ~ October 18th, 2010

There was a segment in a Simpsons episode on Pynchon. I thought it was hilarious how he has a paper bag over his face the entire time.

My favorite quote is “Pynchon loves this book as much as he loves cameras.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jR0588DtHJA

Gravity’s Rainbow and other artsy stuff

by Simona ~ October 18th, 2010

White Light, Jackson Pollock, 1954

This isn’t a direct interpretation of Gravity’s Rainbow but a lot of Pollock’s work is similar to this and seems to depict some kind of universal entropy. Of course, there might be a method to Pollock’s madness, just like there’s a method to the madness of the novel itself.

Zac Smith likes bananas too.

by maggiewong ~ October 17th, 2010

I took some time to skim through the illustrations from the Zac Smith link and I hope I’m not the only one that think so, but most of them look like scribbles done by a 7 year old. Smith said that he mostly “tried to make a series of pictures as dense, intricate, and rich as the prose in the book.” I agree that his drawings are as dense as the book itself, but intricate and rich? I’m really not seeing those qualities from this.

One of the drawings I did like, however, is the one Smith did for page 10 about the bananas.

…banana omelets, banana sandwiches…tall cruets of pale banana syrup to pour oozing over banana waffles…

I didn’t get a chance to go through all the links, but from what I saw this is one of the only illustrations done in color. It looks like Smith put a lot of thought and time into this one because he even included the characters’ faces and their different features. I thought it was interesting that the focus of this drawing is on the food and not the characters.

To tie this back to Simona’s post, I can’t help but ask…what is this fascination with bananas? Maybe Smith understands what Pynchon is trying to convey with this banana mead. Or maybe he also really likes bananas.

Did you guys like any of Smith’s illustrations?

Journey through Gravity’s Rainbow

by lyndsey.anderson ~ October 15th, 2010

My sentiments are the same as most people in the class. This may be one of the most dense book’s i’ve ever had to read. I must admit though, it has been a fun journey analyzing and trying to dissect this book. We’ve explored the lives of Pynchon (as far as we could, at least) and Von Braun. I enjoyed reading the forums, in which most of the comments encouraged the reader to just read the book and enjoy it. The summarizations of the story seemed to confuse me more than the actual story. I did, however, enjoy the picturebook. Our discussion about the chaos theory particularly interested me. This theory proved to be so true in our examination of the book. At first it seems like a bunch of plots thrown together but when closely examined, the intricacy of its design becomes clear. This is much like the art exhibit of the same name as the book.

The groupwork in class made me truly begin to understand the story. I can now say that I know what the heck is going on in the first 4 sections (I think). After the breakdown of the characters and their roles in the story, I see that this is my favorite type of story. I love thrillers. (I wonder why a Gravity’s Rainbow movie was never made.)

I know that the book must go deeper than what I am taking it for. The connection between light and darkness, death and sexuality, and all the religious connotation are all main themes in the novel. Perhaps, an intelligent explanation of these connections will come to me as I continue my reading but for now, i’ll just leave that to the forums.

The Little Things- Gravity’s Rainbow

by apurohit ~ October 14th, 2010

Hmm.  This has to be one of the strangest novels I’ve ever read.  Or rather, attempted to read.  Most of the time, I ended up re-reading to make sure I didn’t miss the point of the sentence and it turns out many times, there is no point.  However, one thing I must admit it is how much Pynchon’s writing style makes me laugh.  It’s extremely genuine and witty, two things I personally appreciate.

I don’t know if anyone else agrees, but there is one particular part in the novel that seemed very real and at the same time hilarious.  At the point in the book where he mentions seeing the attractive “Nurse Darlene.”  The way he describes her is very different from the way a normal, or shall I say, typical writer would describe.  For instance, he instantly compares her not to a flower, moon, or star….but a tomato.  Now to me, that was a rather unique way of describing a beautiful woman.  However, I liked the route he took in describing her, as it gave the reader a fresh way to picture the woman.  When I read, “…an adorable tomato in a nurse uniform,” the first words that came to mind were fresh, soft, and pure.  Unlike the usual, “bright as a star” or even “hot as the sun.”  Referring to a woman as a fruit came across as extremely sweet and innocent to me for some reason.  As silly a line as this is, it really stuck out to me for some reason.  I guess its because there was a certain sincerity in his writing, which helped me relate to the book in some way.  I noticed his writing style throughout the novel, so even after all the confusion and random detailing, the book surprisingly appeals to me in a way.

Even the way he first introduced her name is so realistic. “…and her name’s, uh, well, oh- Darlene. Golly, it’s Darlene.”  Am I the only one who can totally imagine a guy reacting in such a nervous way after admiring a beautiful woman?  Ultimately, it’s little moments like these in a novel that really stick out to me, as I always appreciate a realistic portrayal over one that (though poetic) is cliche.

I’m not nearly close to finishing it, but I’m looking forward to (hopefully) understanding this book at some point, without wishing there was spark note for each line.

Psychological Warfare

by Dr. Sorin ~ October 14th, 2010