This documentary highlights an important debate about what modern music is. As Girl Talk said, creativity often arises from past works, which challenges the traditional concept of copyright. And this is where I wonder: to what extent copyright laws should allow artists to reuse past works to create something different? Because as far as I understand, music, art, and culture in general have always been based on influences and reinterpretations of the past, since that’s what inspires us to create something that may be similar, slightly different, or completely different. Therefore, when an artist like Girl Talk takes fragments of songs and transforms them into something new, they are creating a different work with its own identity, which could be considered an innovation and not an “infringement.” However, this debate remains relevant today, especially with artificial intelligence in music, because TikTok and YouTube have popularized AI-generated songs that mimic artists’ voices, leading to disputes over who owns the music and whether these remixes should be protected or banned. Furthermore, these platforms allow millions of people to take audio, effects, and song fragments to create remixes, challenges, and viral videos. However, copyright laws have often failed to adapt to this reality, restricting or eliminating content that reuses copyrighted materials. Now the question is, should laws evolve to adapt to the new era of remixes and AI? Girl Talk’s work and new technologies force us to rethink the notion of property. I feel that the rules must evolve to reflect and adapt to the reality we live in.