My thesis for my research paper is: Even though there is no straightforward solution to the issue of plagiarism, institutions have continuously shown reluctance in improving the present implementation system to make it fairer and more probable to dishearten plagiarism. I think my thesis makes a clear claim based on the evidence I found in researching that supported my argument. I do think that my thesis could be revised. I think my thesis can be more specific. I can list the ways in which the system is not fair, and I could argue how this issue can be solved.
After going over my first draft of my research paper, I highlighted the sections as defined in M-E-A-L. This stands for main paint, evidence, analysis, and link. I think that some of my paragraphs have a good balance as highlighted, but others could use more work. In some sections, I am making a lot of analytical points, but I am not providing enough evidence for these points. I think I can work on this issue by reviewing the articles and journals that I used for research and picking out more evidence that will be useful for my argument. I would need to add these points of evidence back into the paper. I think that I do a good job of linking all my body paragraphs back to my thesis. However, I think that if I fine-tune my thesis, I may need to go back and fine-tune the sentences I use to link my argument to the thesis.