The three artists and their art that struck out to me during this assignment were Juergen Teller, Jayson Musson, and Andy Warhol. To begin with, my impressions of all of the three artists’ work were contradictory to how I generally portray art in my mind as being deep and elegant. The photographs taken by Juergen Teller are mostly revolving around female nudity while others capture views of people in distorted settings. One of his photographs depicted a huge gallery surrounded by a number of paintings, seemingly famous and expensive, with a couple of naked women sitting in the center frame of the picture. It is hard to understand what exactly is going on in the frames but that in itself is what captures the audience’s attention. Moving on, Andy Warhol visual art included a number of different mediums, including but not limited to paintings, sculptures, sketches, photographs, etc. Unlike Juergen Teller, it was rather easier to interpret the image. I personally like still portraits with subtleties enabling the viewer to have a personal connection to the art and that is exactly what I enjoyed the most about Andy Warhol. Lastly, Jayson Musson was the most fun out of all the artists. From his honest take on the stereotype in the artist community to his extremely candid work, Mr. Musson makes his art speak his philosophy. Interestingly, my first impression when I saw Jayson Musson’s work was how it reminded me of the NFT (non-fungible token) art that is being bought and sold nowadays for a lot of money. Even then, Mr. Musson successfully envelops great meaning in very basic artwork.
Category: Uncategorized
Day 19: Research Process – Julia Green
Finding Evidence
This article gave the reader a basic understanding of everything you need to know to collect informative evidence for a research paper. In the beginning of the article, the writer mentions how the rhetorical situation is very important to collecting effective data. If the evidence found doesn’t have any connections to the circumstances of the question being asked then it isn’t useful. The rest of the article talks about finding data and collecting your own data. I think this article is very useful for someone who is stuck and has no idea how to start research for a paper. It is very informative and basically gives step by step instructions on how to collect the best data.
Under My Thumb
This piece is about a girls experience growing up loving music and dealing with the industry. First, the writer mentions an event that many girls can relate to, which brings the reader to the main idea of this piece. The writer talks about sexism in the music industry and how she believes it can be changed. I can relate to this piece a lot because I have also had the same things happen to me when I am wearing a band tee shirt or when I attended a music festival over the summer. I agree that something needs to change in the music industry to let women feel more welcomed and I believe, like the writer that we are making the change that needs to occur.
Day 15: Revision [Tristen Chau]
- Brock Dethier wrote, “…For most of us revision is the only road to success.” Dethier means that a first draft is never the final draft. If you try to make your draft perfect on the first try, your thoughts will flow less smoothly. The piece, “Shitty First Drafts” talks about how having a messy first draft is perfectly okay. The revision process goes a long way in improvement. People can always improve and once you accept constructive criticism, it will help your writing be successful.
- Dethier uses the metaphor of fixing a car to think about revision. I think of revision similar to playing tennis. You begin with your shots all over the place and there is room for improvement. With the help and constructive criticism of your tennis peers and instructors, your form will become better. With more and more practice, you will begin to see huge improvements in your form and playing abilities. Once you win your first match, you feel content knowing that all the practice that you have done has paid off. This is similar to writing because after lots of revision, you will finally feel content with the end result of your writing.
- Donald Murray stated in “Revising Your Own Manuscripts”, “A piece of writing is never finished.” I agree with Murray’s statement because after experiencing success, you can still improve. If you leave your computer for a little while and then come back, you may see something in your writing that you have not seen before. No matter how much revision you do, it is always helpful to look at other perspectives to improve. This is similar to the tennis metaphor I mentioned earlier. Even after you win your first match, another coach may spot something wrong with the way you are playing. The coach may suggest a different way of holding the racket or hitting the ball at a different point of contact than you are used to, but it may help you even more in the long run.
Day 13: Anzaldua and Naylor (Erik Alatorre)
How to Tame a Wild Tongue
Summary: Anzaldua argues that society has attempted to ‘whitewash’ her and her people. Many fall victim to the pressure and give in, losing their identity. However, there are some like Anzaldua, who resist the pressures and learned to stay true to themselves. As a Chicana, she speaks many languages but she doesn’t identify with all of them and at times the languages backfire. For example, Chicano Spanish is an illegitimate language that she speaks but finds herself only using it at home because she’s afraid that she won’t be understood by others, including other Hispanics. When she discovers Chicano literature she realizes that Chicanos exist as a people and that she should embrace her wild tongue.
Response: Language is a part of our identity. It is the means in which we communicate who we are. Throughout our lives, we learn other languages to be able to communicate with multiple discourses but that doesn’t mean it signifies who we are. Sometimes it can be out of necessity.
The Meanings of a Word”
Summary: Naylor recounts the time in the third grade when she was called a “nigger” by one of her classmates. At the time she had no clue what it meant but by using context clues she knew it was an insult. She realizes in adulthood that it probably wasn’t the first time she has heard the word being used. In her home/neighborhood environment the word had been repurposed to mean anything but an insult. For example, it could mean a man who had gained the approval of others through individual feats of strength, intelligence, etc. Except since she knew the word was used as an insult she asked her mother what it meant.
Response: Words do not define people, actions do. Words without meaning are just sounds. and context is important because the circumstances determine the connotations of the word being used.
Day 12: Alexie and Tan (Erik Alatorre)
Superman and Me
Summary: Sherman Alexie was a Spokane Indian boy living with his family on the Spokane Indian Reservation in eastern Washington state. His father loved books and spurred a love of books in him, however, this love wasn’t shared by others he encountered in his youth. From reading Alexie learned to view everything around him as a paragraph belonging to something greater. There were many factors working against him such as stereotypes. Reservation children were expected to be stupid and to fail in the non-Indian world. Alexie was determined to break this expectation so he kept reading through the hurdles set in front of him. Alexie found that his love for books came out of necessity because he was assuring his survival in the non-Indian world.
Response: For many people, this is the reality of learning a language. It boils down to a matter of life and death because language is a powerful tool. It allows us to communicate our ideas with others and without this ability, we lose out on many opportunities.
Mother Tongue
Summary: Amy Tan is a Chinese-American writer who comes to the realization of the many Englishes she uses in her day to day life. She uses vocabulary and sentence structures that are commonly used by someone in her field of work whereas at home she uses a toned down English with her mother and husband which she describes as her language of intimacy. However, when her mother speaks she uses a broken or limited English which to some might be hard to understand at all but to Tan it’s more than enough for her to understand. Tan and her mother have realized how this has affected their lives for the worse since many people often do not respect someone who cannot communicate their thoughts clearly.
Response: I think most of us can relate to this because depending on the circumstances we’re in will determine how we talk. However, this by no means takes away from what we’re trying to say because there are so many ways to say the same thing. As long as others understand what you’re trying to say then the language has done it’s job.
Damien Balchand
Introduction:
According to the author, Seth Graves, writing is not simply writing an essay for a certain class. The process of writing ultimately takes quite some time, including processes such as “exploring, planning, drafting, and revising”. Over the past five decades, authors have studied on the ways of perfecting their own writing, and they show us how it can help ourselves be able to understand new ideas as we are writing.
Shitty First Drafts:
Lamott begins her argument by stating how in order to be a successful writer, you ultimately need to have crappy drafts prior to your end result. She gives an example of herself when she would be writing something and lays out her process of developing certain ideas.
Freewriting:
Similar to Lamott’s statement, Peter Elbow argues that the best way for people to improve writing is through a process called freewriting. He explains that the idea of simply writing down ideas that pop up in your mind without thinking if it is a logical reason.
(Michael Brigando) Bechdel Test
The Bechdel Test is a set of criteria for movies that emphasizes the fact that all lives are very complex, and have a lot of things going on in them. The test appeared as a sort of joke in Allison Bechdel’s comic strip “Dykes to Watch Out for”, where it also lists the requirements, which are that there must be a conservation between 2 or more women that isn’t about or related to men. The set of criteria soon gained popularity on a global scale by the feminist community, due to the fact that many feminists saw that many female characters in movies weren’t as complexly made as their male counterparts. Some have even done as far as to make addition to the Bechdel Test, with examples including that the conversation between the 2 or more women must go on for a certain amount of time.
Going back to Bechdel’s comic, is there a specific audience for “Dykes to Watch Out for”? How popular was the the comic strip when this specific one was made? I’m interested in finding out just how much the audience helped in the popularization of the Bechdel Test.
Damien Balchand
Dancing Around Objectification
In the setting of a Harlem performance, two women that were performing The Harlem Dancer and The Invisible Man that were both portrayed as an appeal to men sexually. They were overlooked of their talents of dancing and singer, rather to be become a simple idealized object. The Harlem dancer is forced not to retaliate against the men in the crowd, mainly due to the fact that being an African American within the time period had no equal rights as the other citizens of society.
Intersectionality 101
According to the article on Intersectionality, it is “a methodology of studying the relationships among multiple dimensions and modalities of social relationships and subject formations”. It refers to the culture interactions that ultimately can result in racial and gender discrimination, particularly against people of color. They disagree with the Standpoint Theory, which refers to the different and unique living experiences that these certain minority groups lived in.
Jean Estrada: Intersectional Readings
“Dancing Around Objectification,” by Victoria Merlino
Victoria Merlino’s opinion piece on the “Harlem Dancer” demonstrates vividly the contrast between women who are alike in nature but different in perception. Merlino illustrates the difference of women dancers whose image and appreciation differs on the basis of their race by describing the way these two groups are described. These polarized attitudes, Merlino explains, is clearly evident with how a black woman was forced to relinquish her identity in order to serve as a “temptress” and the white woman being idealized and in a way placed as a valuable object.
“Intersectionality 101” by Reddit
Intersectionality, according to Reddit users, covers the relationship among multiple dimensions and modalities of social relationship where various biological, social, and cultural categories intersect. The methodology of intersectional discrimination, in particular, holds that forms of oppression end up involving one another, meaning discriminative oppression is never unaccompanied (gender, race, class, ability, etc). In fruition, Kimberle Williams Crenshaw metaphorized this by explaining how gender and race oppression intersected similar to a collision of cars in an intersection. Intersectionality many facets extend to various variations such as the Interlocking Matrix of Oppression, which deal with social classifications, and the Standpoint Theory, which dealt with personal experiences and their influence. Regardless of how intersectionality is internalized, it generalizes as the interrelation of struggles.
“The Urgency of Intersectionality” by Kimberle Crenshaw
Kimberle Crenshaw’s TED talk addressed the unfair practices of discrimination that black women are subjected to because of their intersectionality of being both black and female. Crenshaw uses the story of Emma Degafenary whose intersectionality served as a double exclusion in finding employment. The framework of this double discrimination is illustrated by the metaphors of the intersection of roads, where being in the intersection means being marginalized to the fullest. The challenges that simple intersectionality can pose means a dangerous dynamic prevalent in the lives of most Americans.
The Bechdel Test
The Bechdel Test identifies gender inequality in film by evaluating whether a film involves conversation between two women where the focal point of the conversation is not a man. The test serves as an indicator of whether a film lacks equality between men and women. The premise of this test to me highlights an issue that I as a man would not identify by my own means as I am not directly marginalized by it.
Connection:
All of the writings see intersectionality as the way to label the summed experience of marginalized groups, differing between gender inequality and race discrimination. The dynamic between intersectionality and oppression, to me, is similar to that of a solution and its catalyst. After reflecting on my own “intersectionalities”, it is interesting how my identity directly reflects what my oppression is. Putting it into perspective being how, me being a male inflicts one thing, me being a person of color inflicts on another thing, and both connected is a shithole altogether.
Every Body Happy (Erik Alatorre)

I see this advertisement at the Blink gym that I go to and it reminds me of the Google logo we discussed in class. It is colorful and the word selection is kept simple but effective in making potential members feel welcomed. Joining the gym can be intimidating for some people and the advertisement (originally a video and better than this photo) is meant to show people that all types of people can join and share the same goal of getting fit.