Volume III

In Volume III, Victor promised the ” Monster” that he would create a mate for him, so he would not feel lonely anymore. But victor fears that maybe his new creature would reject  and repulsed by his appearance. it was really interesting how the monster showed his desire of having somebody else like him in order to not feel reject anymore. He confronted victor and asked him if he dared to break and destroy his hopes and that if he dare to do that he would ruin and attack him on the date of his wedding. Victor was really worry about it, because he did not want to traumatize Elizabeth and also he did not want Elizabeth to see the monster and see how the monster kill him.

It touched my heart how the volume ends, the monster confessed Walton how he is feeling about killing his creator and also how he is felling about bring pain and sorrow to those who love victor. He also told Walton that he just wanted to be happy and feel loved. he asked the question ” Am I to be the only criminal, when all humankind sinned against me?” .The monster is really upset and he wants to end with his life .

1. Why victor thinks that she (new creature) would reject the monster?

2. why the monster wants to end his life at the end of the volume ?

Frankenstein by Mary Shelley Volume III

In the volume I of the Frankenstein by Mary Shelley the story let us know the motivations of the experiment of Victor Frankenstein and the horrible creature created as a result. First, we see Victor Frankenstein gathering the information for his scientific cause the “creation of life”, looking for information from teachers at the University of Ingolstadt and developing his skills for to accomplish his experiments. After two years of study and labor Victor Frankenstein success in the creation of the creature. We can perceive Victor Frankenstein as an insecure person incapable of assume the consequences of his
experimentation’s because he hides from his creation letting the living being abandoned. In a moment of remorse for his actions Victor Frankenstein try to get back to Geneva to his family and friends finding that his brother William has been killed.  For this Justine Moritz a servant for the Frankenstein house was accused, condemned and executed by mistake.

On the second Volume of Frankenstein, we can perceive the sense of guilt of Victor Frankenstein for not to reveal the truth about the dead of his brother and the execution of an innocent person. On Mouth Blanc, Victor Frankenstein met the monster and we start reading the story from the point of view of the creature. He describes the process and the difficulties that he experience from the moment of his birth. He describes his first moments on this world, his senses and his fears.  During this Volume the Monster tells Victor about how he has to develop an ability for to survive, how he discovers fire and how he uses for to cook his meals, one of the parts that really cached my attention was when after the creature learned to read and started questioning about his existence and his origin, he realized that he was like Adam (p.105) created by a god with no link with other living creature.  This is the point where the creature discovers the papers from the Frankenstein’s laboratory in his pocket and interprets the symbols and the notes given.  At this moment the creature decides to approach the family looking for protection but only he finds rejection. As a consequence the monster decides to run after his creator and starts his journey to Genève where he tastes the pain of being shot as a reward for saved a girl.

The Volume II coming to an end when the creature relates to Frankenstein the reason why he killed William Frankenstein in the woods. During this transition to the Volume III the mood of the creature changes, it’s no more the innocent creature from the beginning of the Volume II, he is full developed in his senses and his objectives are clear: he doesn’t want to be alone in this world anymore and he wants revenge from his creator.

Victor Frankenstein in the Volume III stars a journey across Europe. The motivation for this journey according to Frankenstein is to prepare and gather the information for the preparations destined to the creation of the female companion to the creature. For this porpoise Frankenstein takes his time, travels across Europe and stars feeling hesitant about the accomplishment of his promise to the creature. He expects that the time past and something random could happen to the living being. He starts guessing about the creation of a new female creature and the possible bad outcome to this process. Frankenstein feared about a new race of uncontrollable “devils” (p.138). The creature that have followed Victor Frankenstein during his journeys saw the destruction of his female being and promised revenge on the night of Victor’s wedding: “I shall be with you on your weeding night” (p.140). After abandon his project Frankenstein decides to leave to Switzerland and start his fleeing in a small boat in the middle of the night. The boat is carried away to a near island where he is imprisoned, accused for the dead of Henry Clerval. After a couple of moths Frankenstein is cleared of the homicide of his friend and benefactor and goes back to Genève in company of his father. In Paris he receives a letter from Elizabeth and he decides (no matter the promise of the creature) to marry her. On his wedding night Frankenstein hears the scream of his wife and he found her dead, killed by the creature. The notice of the dead of Elizabeth leads to the dead of his father. As a consequence Victor Frankenstein began the chase of the creature for all across Europe and ended in the Arctic Ocean near Russia where he dies from sickness. The creature appears in front of his dead body and had a conversation with Mr. Walton where he reflex about his motivation for his crimes and end with his vengeance and then vanishes in the ice.

The character of the creature really gained my sympathy from the beginning of the story. From the point of his creation the creature really suffered but he was adaptable to difficult situations. The creature has unique characteristics that made him a super human or more human than his creator: He possessed physical abilities like he’s supernatural strength; he’s rapidly learning skills and he’s ability for to resist extreme weather conditions. But the creature share with the humans their emotions and his emotions where augmented as his physical strength that may be made the creature not to reason clearly and commit the homicides. For me the creature was born well but the society and the human world molded him and turned him evil.

  1. Every time when Victor Frankenstein are supposed to take responsibility for his actions during the story he got sick. Do you think the lack of responsibility of Victor Frankenstein was a decisive factor in the story?
  2. According to the text the human beings are created according with the characteristics of his creators. There are similarities between Victor Frankenstein and the Monster?

 

Frankenstein: Volume II

In Volume II, we are we are given the opportunity to listen to the monster, Frankenstein’s, story on his adaptation to survival on his own after being created. This part in the novel is significant because it truly affects our perspective on him. From Victor’s point of view, he was a cold hearted murderer and a demon. But, from the monster’s point of view, he was struggling like a young child trying to adapt to society. When Frankenstein was first created, he did not receive any paternal love, but instead, was faced with disgust and cruelty. He was abandoned by Victor and was forced to survive on his own in the wild. The new senses he was experiencing, sound, from music from birds, and adaptation to sight, from night and day, was all new to him. The feeling of hunger and experimenting with what is edible and what is not makes me as a reader pity him. While he may stand over eight feet tall, he acts like that of a young child. The example when he had first experienced pain and warmth from a fire was something a parent would teach their child at a young age. The struggles he faced was unimaginable and makes us as a reader question what we truly feel about him.

The turning point for Frankenstein’s behavior would be when he was accused several times for crimes he did not commit. When he was learning to act more humane like, his intentions were true and had really cared for the old man’s family. But, because of his appearance, he was misunderstood as a monster and as a demon. The kind actions he did was immediately thought of as a sign of harm because of his features. After his attempt at kindness had failed every single time, he had finally given up on attempting to receive love from mankind and threatens Victor for a companion of his own.

If we were put in Victor’s point of view, would we as readers want to create a companion for Frankenstein? If we did, would the monsters really leave mankind and live in isolation or would they go back on their words and harm even more people? The struggle Victor has on this decision can impact both his personal life and the world. This struggle is difficult because he could create the monster to satisfy the creature and live in peace with his family but at the same time create even more harm on society.

Questions:

1. What is your opinion on the monster Frankenstein? Do you abhor him as like Victor’s family for murdering William, and the victim Justine, or do you pity him after hearing his story on survival and adaptation?

2. If you were in Victor’s position, would you or would you not have created a female version of Frankenstein?

Bright Star: Would I were Stedfast as Thou Art

The speaker of this poem begins by talking to a start like he normally talk to a person, and he actually calls this star by a name. But what exactly was he trying to say to this “bright star”? at the beginning of the poem, the lines would describe the meaning of the words where he was trying to say how he would like to be like this certain star. He says “Would I were stedfast as thou art”, which it actually means “I wish I were as steadfast as you are”. This could might make you think that the speaker is a person who travels a lot and he’s desire is to be at one place only.

However, as you keep on reading he tries to change up his words around by saying how he would not like to be like the star, huh?

Furthermore, he uses the word “Emirate”, which it was use as a fancy way to the word “hermit”in the seventeen century, and it means loneliness. There, he is revealing why would he not like to be like the star. Why would he start by saying that he would like to be like a star and then changes his mind?. As you can see, later on the poem he starts to reveal what exactly the star is gazing on from up there. Then, he sees that although this star is steadfast is still too far away from others, and this is why he lays on his girlfriend breast feeling a relief of having her near him. Therefore, he says “still steadfast, still unchangeable”, where I believe that what he is trying to say that he might want to be as steadfast as the star, but not change anything that already is surrounding him.

1. What difference do you think the order of the words make? Which order do you prefer? why?

2.Why do you think he changes his thought of wanting to be as steadfast as the star?

La Belle Dame sans Merci: An Allegory for Life’s Duality

Upon first reading La Belle Dame sans Merci or The Beautiful Lady without Mercy, it is easy to interpret the story as simply that of a poor knight who falls gravely ill after falling in love with a beautiful, yet mystical woman. However, upon further examination, one might come to a vastly different conclusion: is this a story of a knight falling gravely in love with a femme fatale or is there double meaning to almost everything being said?

Much is discussed about the dualistic nature of life and existence. There is no hot without cold; there is no good without evil; there is no life without death. John Keats truly explores this idea, in both subtle ways and some not so subtle ways. In setting, the knight and the narrator are in a barren, cool autumn while the beautiful lady exists in a fertile summer haze. In health, with the narrator, the knight is ill and dying while with the la belle dame, the knight is lively and well. More abstractly, Keats uses lilies and roses, two beautiful flowers, to describe the physical appearance of the dying knight. The double entendres also, in a way, represent this duality. Is the “fragrant zone” referring simply to the flowers or rather is it a reference to la belle dame’s genital region? Is the pacing steed a horse or rather is it a crude reference to the knight’s erection?

Overall, the marriage of two opposites is necessary in order for both to exist. The knight would not know the pleasure of la belle dame without the pain he suffered through after.

Questions:
1. Does the repetition of the lines “ The sedge has withered from the lake, And no birds sing” at the start and end of the ballad further represent duality?
2. Is la belle dame a mystical woman or rather a metaphor for something else?

Variations on the right to remain silent: the power of the silent.

To stay silent is a situation that leads someone sometimes to consider guilty, sometimes creates confusion and others leads to controversy for his sayings or his actions. However, in the other hand, to remain silent probably is the only way to express the pure reality and hides the only truth that someone has inside him. In the story of Anne Carson ‘’ Variations on the right to remain silent ‘’ the classic author represents exactly this of two substances morph of the silence. Here we have three stories that are mostly represented, and each of them is a different case, but all of them have the same denominator witch is the silence of their words or the silence that covers painting, or the silence that it is hide behind the translation of words.

In the first case something that caught my attention was a word (mwly) the Greek from mythology word that is it is very difficult to translate in English, but even more is difficult to translate and to give the real meaning or the real story that is behind this word. Even if we try to do that this word that for the ancient Greek mythology was something important, will lose this religious power that it has. Furthermore, Francis Bacon has also a silence painting. He wanted to convey the sense through of his painting without to give more explanation, because then, if do so its painting will lose its magic and real meaning of what he wants to convey with his painting. As this article was ending Anne Carson try to translate some fragment poems and she did that in a funny way, because she was trying to translate them with wrong words or with meaning totally different from its original. Emphasizes in this way how much difficult is to translate, and she underlines that some words has to remain silent in order to stay with their truth and real meaning.

The subject that makes me to struggle more and creates me a lot of senses of sadness and of injustice was the story of Joan of Arc. This particular came to the point to prove that we are unable to translate everything and to give to them en exact meaning. She refers to her ‘’voices’’ in her trial, that guided her personality as a God in her life.’’ Voices’’ which she does not want to give physical substation, she does not want to explain how these voices were for her in what shape or what form. She wanted to let them as an abstract which if someone explains it loses its meaning and loses their power. This decision that she took to do not explain clearly the meaning of the voices and to translate them in the real world, by letting them in silence was finally her condemnation in the court, it something that makes me thinking that a silence make really troubles, and brings injustices. That point leads me to think even more about the title of this article ‘’ variations on the right to remain silent’’. Her right to remain silent and to do not explain the meaning of these voices gave to other people the right to make her guilty.

Questions 1 ) : The title of the article is ‘’ Variations on the right to remain silent’’, how this right to remain silent it is expressed and responds in the stories of the article.

Question 2) : Do you have ever think in the way that Anne Carson thinks about the silence of the words that are untranslated? Do you have ever think how much power has an untranslated word or action?

“Bewitched” – Poor Manago

The author of “Bewitched,” Ueda Akinari has a profound way of bringing characters to life in his stories. While reading “Bewitched,” I was able to connect with the characters Toyo-o and Manago. By the time I reached the conclusion of the story, I couldn’t help but feel empathy towards Manago. Although she seemed like the antagonist in “Bewitched,” her only fault was her undying love for Toyo-o.  She didn’t deserve to be treated cruelly and trapped in a grave mound for the rest of her life.

Manago is a supernatural serpent creature, who has the ability to bewitch humans using a beautiful, human façade. When Manago and Toyo-o first meet, it is love at first sight. Toyo-o gives her an umbrella, and Manago is touched not only by his kindness, but also his handsome appearance. Manago recounts this magical moment during their second encounter, “I enjoyed the blessings of your hospitality and friendship. I felt certain that you were a sincere man, and that I should devote the rest of my life to you” (635). She confesses her feelings towards Toyo-o and they both make an eternal pledge to get married.  Throughout the story, Manago’s love for Toyo-o only grows stronger. In one instance, she describes how they are fated lovers and threatens that he must never leave her, “My dear husband, there is nothing strange about all this. Even if you have forgotten your pledge to me, made across the seas and over the mountains, we meet again because it has been predestined. […] And I warn you, don’t ever try to do away with yourself” (645). She even vows to follow him anywhere.

Although Manago’s love for Toyo-o is unwavering, Toyo-o’s love for Manago fluctuates. He quickly turns on her when he is arrested and when the priest reveals to him that she is not a human. Toyo-o only denounces his love for Manago when he finds out that she is a supernatural creature. Prior to knowing she was a serpent creature, they enjoyed a happy marriage.

Ultimately I believe Manago didn’t deserve to be treated badly. Although she acts in ways that reader may deem as unjust, she does it because of her love for Toyo-o. When she kills the priest, it is only as self-defense because the priest was trying to destroy her and was telling Toyo-o things that made him despise her. She also takes over Tomiko’s body because she was jealous that her husband was trying to marry another woman. In the end, Manago can’t help that she is a serpent creature who has fallen in love with a human. She does all in her power to stay with Toyo-o. She may not be the most innocent character, but I feel sympathy towards her.

 

Questions:

  1. Do you feel sympathy towards Manago? Do you believe she was a crazy, evil serpent monster or a misunderstood supernatural creature seeking love?
  2. How do you feel about the ending of the story? Did the characters deserve their happy or sad ending?

Bewitched; A Story of Redemption

“Bewitched”, written by Ueda Akinari, is a story that focuses on many themes that we have discussed.  Love, manipulation, and family discord are all prevalent  in the plot.  In fact, in just the third paragraph, Toyo-o, the protagonist, is already described as a problem to his father for his lack of interest in the family business (632).  Later on, when the commotion regarding the stolen sword is erupting, Toyo-o is referred to as a “good-for-nothing son” by his Father (637).

From the moment Manago enters the story, her beauty demands the focus of Toyo-o.  She is befittingly portrayed as “bewitchingly voluptuous” and not only keeps Toyo-o up at night, but is implanted in his dreams.  It is interesting to note that the author does not refer to her by name, thereby alluding to the fact that she may not be any one person, or even a person at all. Perhaps one of the most unique sentences of the story was when Toyo-o is described as feeling like “a bird taking flight from its roost” after Manago confesses her love to him.  We know that birds are known to represent freedom and positivity in literature, but in this case the protagonist is heading down a path that leads to the exact opposite.

When Manago finds again in the trading area of Tanabe (641), it is really amazing how quickly and effectively she is able to turn the crowd on her side.  With a few simple reasons about why she may not be a devil and a tear-filled plea to explain herself, she is brought into a home with open arms – the home of Toyo-o’s sister nonetheless.  Toyo-o, just as the husband from “The Wise Neighbor”, was unable to resist the physical beauty of his partner for more than a few days, and forgot all else in his life.

It was pleasantly surprising that Toyo-o was able to literally exercise his demons and go on to live a long and healthy life.  As he is suffocating the devil “with all his strength” (647) at the end of the story, one can feel his 100 days in jail, his accusatory and ungrateful father, and the times he was threatened and deceived all releasing to create this unbreakable hold over the devil.

For Questions:

1. Was there a climax to this winding story?  Could there have been more than one?

2. The old man Tagima seems to come out of nowhere and potentially save many lives.  Is he a coincidental hero, or perhaps a symbol of something greater?

 

 

Blog Post Assignment

I’ve updated the blog post assignment and complete sign up sheet. Check for your name; make sure it’s there! You will notice a slight edit in the due dates for your comments on classmates’ blog posts. Please take note of these and, to receive full credit, be sure to space out your four comments in the three periods specified on the assignment.

“The Barrelmaker Brimful of Love” : Sexual Desire and Manipulation

The theme of sexual desire is persistent throughout “The Barrelmaker Brimful of Love”. Manipulation is another theme present throughout the story. As talked about in class, modernity results in a rise of manipulators and the focus of individuals and their desires.

“The Barrelmaker Brimful of Love” touches on both those prevalent themes. When Osen, old Nanny, Kyushichi, and the cooper go on their journey the men’s sexual intrigues get the best of them. “Thereafter the four of them slept in the same inn each night. Kyushichi, watching carefully for any opportunity to satisfy his secret desires…” (Saikaku 598). Throughout the night Kyushichi tries his hardest to make a pass at Osen. Of course, the cooper prevents this from happening but, “Thus the two men stood in each other’s way the whole night through” (Saikaku 598), suggests that both men tried to fulfill their sexual desires. Osen herself gave into her sexual desires when she went upstairs to join the cooper, “Upstairs she found her lover, and together they drank the cup of betrothal, pledging themselves to each other forever” (Saikaku 599).

The Nanny is the greatest manipulator in this story. She manipulates the family into thinking Osen must get married because there is a man who is supposedly “… desperately in love, so tortured by his fatal passion… He swore that within a week after his death his ghost would come to kill every member of this household” (Saikaku 594). The story Nanny told Osen, Osen believed it in its entirety. “Without further persuasion and before she had even seen him, Osen was consumed with love for this man” (Saikaku 595).