Durning Down the House: The revisionary Paradigm of Jean Rhys’s

“Whether I have any right to do it is a question which I’ll face later.”

After I read this chapter and look at the critical on the book. I find out Rhys’s revision career the critical readers. Also it is target at feminist marker. This is complete different as the marker value at that time. However, different people always have different way to think and their point view are totally different. Just like Rhys use the novels three sections to move the read go in deep and deep to Rochester’s first wife Bertha’s world. She is a unlunck women. When we think we will think Jane Eyre is more and more lunck than Antoinette. To be honest, I think Jane Eyre and Antoinette have a lot same place. Even auther change her to Bertha Antoinette Mason creates a new person to make this lie more look like true. As the author describes whether we can have the right to face all of these lies. To be honest, it let me remember when Jane Eyre was litter she is also very extreme. But during the after life she met the right person so she have the different opinion of Bertha. And at the end Jane and Rochester live together happily. But Antoinette put herself in fire and burn it down. It full performance for each approach the things differently. I think this also is the part make reader interest and think more about the things happen in the story.