Manifestos and Radical Language
The S.C.U.M. Manifesto uses radical language that strengthens the emotional appeal to Valerie Solanas’ audience. Solanas effectively utilizes ethos by using colloquial terminology and depicting scenarios that women could easily all relate to. Solanas’ manifesto is like a stream of consciousness, as there is a lot of fragmented thoughts, . In an almost rant-like structure and flow of consciousness, the radical language manages to be successful in its purpose of provoking thought and questioning the patriarchy. While this manifesto’s radical scenarios are still relatable, there were times when the suggestions forced me to grimace. For example, when Solanas mentions that a solution is to remove capitalism from the system, which will hinder progress in all aspects and all directions. Quite frankly, to those struggling to make capital, that might have just tipped the scale in Solanas’ favor, as they would like to oppose and resist a system that has bounded them down for so long. In my opinion, some radical expressions are okay, but radically expressing your ridiculously farfetched ideas is not. While in The S.C.U.M. Manifesto the language is hip, informal and very thought-provoking, The Black Panther Party’s manifesto was formal, structured and contained reasonable suggestions for the conflicts. The tone of this manifesto is clear, as there are certain problems that black-Americans have a problem with, and there are rather easy fixes that are suggested and left untouched. The Black Panther Party’s manifesto repeated the phrase “We believe” very often, which stood out to me and showed their unity. Their agenda is very streamlined and straightforward, with valid reasons for the changes or amendments. While their language is not as radical, it is more sensible and will be understood and read by more of society, while Solanas’ manifesto is more appealing to certain groups in society and is almost a call to arms for political activism, as it moves you to make progress towards their agenda.