What stuck with me while reading the poem was that God is an omnipotent being that we can never understand according to the Pope or should try to understand that we should stay content with what we have. Another issue that I had with the pope is that Section 7 said reason is the main value we should hold to give our action why is it believing in God is based on our inapprehensive when we could easily be fooled by something like an Evil Genius. Evil Genius can be omnipotent and he can easily fool all of us believing that it is a reality when it is in fact a illusion of our mind. I didn’t understand why isn’t it good to complain against good if we can’t understand it because if we do understand it it might or might not give us a sense of comfort instead of relying on the belief that knowing is just misery. The class went very well for me because I believed I had gotten the easiest section out of everybody for some reason. The section was just a summary of the other sections plus two ideas that about submitting to God and taking for whatever happens as is it suppose to happen. Plus I got the learn the most famous quote of the poem in my section thanks to the Professor. I believe scientific exploration is a key dynamic to finding unknown answers that we can empirically conceive. However, there should be a boundary with consciousness, morality, ethics, nature vs nurture, etc. I say boundary but not exclusively limited to because of the fact that there is a lot of gray areas to be had with and therefore the rules should be dynamic to what could be appropriate at a universal time. One impression that hit me the most was “Whatever is, is right” because how can you argue against destiny when its such an abstract idea that can’t be exactly refuted or agreed upon so easily.
