“She gave me a dinner of fifty dishes of meats, which, after their fashion, was placed on the table but one at a time, and was extremely tedious, but the magnificence of her table answered well to that of her dress. The knives were of gold, the hafts set with diamonds, but the piece of luxury that grieved my eyes was the table cloth and napkins, which were all tiffany embroidered with silks and gold in the finest handkerchiefs that ever came out of this country” (Montagu, 116).
Throughout Lady Montagus letters, she presented the Turkish as being very wealth. Cardini also supported this observation. He described the Sultan, Suleiman “the magnificent” as being known for his “pomp and opulence” entertainment (Cabini, 157). Suleiman was particularly successful in battles (Carbini, 152) and thus, would have acquired more wealth from the new lands, including taxes from non-Muslims. Clearly, even Turks liked a little elegance at the dining table. The table layout was probably more sophisticated than the visitor expected; maybe a more crude setting was anticipated.
“The government here is entirely in the hands of the army and the Grand Signor with all his absolute power as much as a slave as any of his subjects, and trembles at a janissary’s frown” (Montagu, 66).
The many conquests of the Turks were largely due to the strength of the Janissaries who were groomed from a very age to become a very elite army contingent serving the Turkish Sultan even though they were Christians (Carbini, 152). It would have been very prudent indeed for the Sultan to “play nice” with the Janissaries even though they were conscripts. The success of battles depended on the Janissaries. Although, they were beaten down sometimes, the Turks were resilient and came back strong. When the Turks ships were destroyed in battle; they rebuilt them and went on to win more battles and conquer land (Carbini, 159). The Ottoman Empire was one of the long reigns in the Islamic World and it governed lands from North Africa stretching around the Mediterranean Sea and up into European territory.
“The Turk took the money, which he presented to her, and told her she was at liberty, but the lady very discreetly weighted the different treatment she was likely to find in her native country. Her Catholics relations, as the kindest thing they could do for her in her present circumstances, would certainly confine her to a nunnery for the rest of her days. Her infidel lover was very handsome, very tender, fond of her and lavished at her feet all the Turkish magnificence” (Montagu, 136).
Marriages between Muslims and Christians were not encouraged during the Middle ages. In this instance, the Christian woman made the decision to stay with her Muslim captor since she would have been an outcast in her own community. In earlier class discussions, this practice would not have been uncommon. There would have been more likelihood of Christians converting to Islam as there was more opportunity for social mobility within the Islamic community. Even Christian rebels became fleet commanders and governors in the Ottoman Empire (Carbini, 165). There seemed to be more tolerance within the Ottoman empire for people from other religious who just needed to pay the non-Muslim tax and pledge allegiance to the Sultan (Carbini, 163).
“ ´Tis certain we have but very imperfect relations of the manners and religion of these people, this part of the world being seldom visited but for merchants, who mind little but their own affairs, or travellers who make too short a stay to be able to report anything exactly of their own knowledge” (Montagu, 60).
Carbini supported Montagu statement regarding the lack of information about the Islamic world. He found that Muslims were more knowledgeable about Christians that vice-versa probably due the lack of literature making its way to Europe (Carbini, 168). Towards the later stages of the Middle Ages, trading and more exposure to the Ottoman Empire helped to disperse information further into Europe (Carbini, 169). The essays from The Metropolitan Museum of Art also revealed that there were well-established trade links between the Islamic World, Africa, Asia and Europe.
“You may guess then how effectively this disguises them, that there is no distinguishing the great lady from her slave and ‘tis impossible for the most jealous husband to know his wife when he meets her, and no man dare touch or follow a woman in the street… I look upon Turkish women as the only free people in the empire” (Montagu, 71-72).
Lady Montagu’s implication that Turkish women were free and some even had lovers was somewhat baffling. She implied that the women dressed as their slaves would make arrangements to have secret tête–à–têtes. Traditionally, Muslim women in the Islamic World, would have been restricted to the home of their fathers or husbands. Implying that the women could do what they wanted yet having to do it in secret did not seem to be “free” by any stretch of the imagination. If the women were free then their husbands would know of the lovers and there would be no need for any disguise or secret rendezvous.
References
Carboni, Stefano, and Trinita Kennedy. “Venice’s Principal Muslim Trading Partners: the Mamluks, the Ottomans, and the Safavids.” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/vmos/hd_vmos.htm (March 2007).
Carboni, Stefano, and Trinita Kennedy, and Elizabeth Marwell. “Commercial Exchange, Diplomacy, and Religious Difference between Venice and the Islamic World.” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/cedr/hd_cedr.htm (March 2007).
Cardini, Franco. Europe and Islam. Wiley-Blackwell. 2001.
Montagu, Lady Mary Wortley. Turkish Embassy Letters. United Kingdom: Virago, 1994.