Topic: Binary of Memory vs. forgetfulness, with a focus on the prominent importance given to the act of remembering and the cautionary tales and adverse attitudes towards forgetfulness.
Thesis: In The Odyssey, Homer is obsessed with recounting as many stories as possible, regardless of their importance to the telos; indeed, though there are times when certain characters would prefer to forget the past, nearly all of these episodes are cast in a negative light.
Passage 1: Book 21 (9-39)
And there lay the curved bow
And the quiver, still loaded with arrows,
Gifts which a friend of Odysseus had given him
When they met in Lacedaemon long ago.
This was Iphitus, Eurytus’ son, a godlike man.
They had met in Messene, in the house of Ortilochus.
Odysseus had come to collect a debt
The Messenians owed him: three hundred sheep
They had taken from Ithaca in a sea raid,
And the shepherds with them. Odysseus
Had come to get them back, a long journey
For a young man, sent by his father and elders
Iphitus had come to search for twelve mares
He had lost, along with the mules they were nursing.
These mares turned out to be the death of Iphitus
When he came to the house of Heracles, Zeus’ tough-hearted son, who killed him,
Guest though he was, without any regard
For the gods’ wrath or the table they had shared—
Killed the man and kept the strong-hoofed mares.
It was while looking for these mares that Iphitus
Met Odysseus and gave him the bow
Which old Eurytus had carried and left to his son.
Odysseus gave him a sword and spear
To mark the beginning of their friendship
But before they had a chance to entertain each other
Zeus’ son killed Iphitus, son of Eurytus,
A man like the gods. Odysseus did not take
The bow with him on his black ship to Troy.
It lay at home as a memento of his friend,
And Odysseus carried it only on Ithaca.
Notes: These 30 lines are solely dedicated to a chronicle of Odysseus’ bow. Rehashing the bow’s lengthy history in such a verbose, detailed and repetitive manner adds little to the teleological scheme of the narrative. Like Eumaeus’ backstory, considering this passage as “unpractical”, belies the reader’s inaccurate expectations of the narration. Indeed, the bow is the quintessence of the immense value Homer places on remembering everything.
Passage 2: Book 4 (239-248)
But Helen, child of Zeus, had other ideas.
She threw a drug into the wine bowl
They were drinking from, a drug
That stilled all pain, quieted all anger
And brought forgetfulness of every ill
Whoever drank wine laced with this drug
Would not be sad or shed a tear that day,
Not even if his own father and mother
Should lie there dead, or if someone killed
His brother, or son, before his eyes.
Helen had gotten this potent, cunning drug
From Polydamna, the wife of Thon,
A woman in Egypt, where the land
Proliferates with all sorts of drugs,
Many beneficial, many poisonous.
Men there know more about medicines
Than any other people on earth,
For they are of the race of Paeeon, the Healer
Notes: the fact that Helen did this operation in secret, points to a reality in the attitudes of the time—namely, at least amongst the royalty, achieving forgetfulness wasn’t something typically sought out. This is especially true for Telemachus, whose memory of his father is the entire reason he sets out on his own journey.
Passage 3: Book 9 (92-102)
They headed out and made contact with the Lotus-Eaters,
Who meant no harm but did give my men
Some lotus to eat. Whoever ate that sweet fruit
Lost the will to report back, preferring instead
To stay there, munching lotus, oblivious of home.
I hauled them back wailing to the ships,
Bound them under the benches, then ordered
All hands to board their ships on the double
Before anyone else tasted the lotus.
They were aboard in no time and at their benches,
Churning the sea white with their oars.
Notes: The main takeaway from this passage is that if people don’t remember their purpose in life they become goalless zombies. They may be happier, but judging by Odysseus’ refusal to even experiment with the Lotus, it is clear that this was considered a forbidden pleasure. Judging by Odysseus’ reaction, he knew right away that such intensely relaxing forgetfulness is too intoxicating, and would derail any prospect of returning home.
You have provided great evidence to back up your thesis of memory being more valuable than forgetfulness. A great way to lead the introduction into your thesis is by connecting how in ancient Greek, memory was the dominant medium of communication (making memory valuable) and how the Odyssey shows its worth. Also, another way you can show the importance of memory is by showing ways of how memory has actually created a social bonds in The Odyssey, or how it has asserted one’s social standing or authority. Great Work!
Hi Michael,
Great thesis and supporting evidence. I agree with your claim that Odysseus’ reaction towards the lotus-eaters and their sweet fruit strongly highlight the notion that remembering is more valuable than forgetting. Odysseus has suffered so much that he would probably be better off eating some of the fruit and forgetting his pains but he knows the danger this brings and chooses otherwise. I actually hadn’t given much thought to the Lotus-eaters episode given that it is such a short part of the epic; however, after reading your analysis I can definitely see how it perfectly ties in with all the other moments in which the importance of memory is emphasized. You have done a great job so far and I look forward to seeing what your final piece will look like!