As feminist movements began to take over the 1960’s, other movements began to form as well including the Native American rights movement.
“As the civil rights and antiwar movements developed in the 1960s, Indians were already gathering their energy for resistance, thinking about how to change their situation, beginning to organize.”
Zinn explains that Native Americans were beginning to take action for their own rights and to declare their own destiny for the cause. He talks about how Native Americans were treated throughout history and how that there was not enough support for their own rights.
“Resistance was already taking shape in various parts of the country. In the state of Washington, there was an old treaty taking land from the Indians but leaving them fishing rights. This became unpopular as the white population grew and wanted the fishing areas exclusively for themselves.”
Many non Indians failed to respect those treaties that was supposed to help the Native Americans. Natives were still being treated as a nobody and as outcasts. They were considered to be on the same page as blacks or even at the very bottom. The Indians always insisted their territory was separate and not to be invaded by the white man’s law.
To conclude things up, I think there was a clear cut reason why Howard Zinn included these kinds of individuals and movements in this chapter. Native Americans were clearly being taken advantage of from land, treaties, you name it.
Obviously the women’s movement was biggest picture of the 1960s, but the emergence of the Prison Abolition movement was not far behind.
“The prisons in the United States had long been an extreme reflection of the American system itself: the stark life differences between rich and poor, the racism, the use of victims against one another, the lack of resources of the underclass to speak out, the endless “reforms” that changed little.”
This movement seeks to reduce and eliminate prison systems and replace them with a more effective system than they had back then. Dostoevski even notes that : “The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.” These prisons reflected a society between the social classes of the rich and the poor. However, Zinn explains that minorities in the prisons were treated worse than whites. “It had long been true, and prisoners knew this better than anyone, that the poorer you were the more likely you were to end up in jail.” Zinn says that these “minorities” are more likely to end up in jail in the first place, not just because they committed more crimes, but they didn’t have the resources like the rich. They didn’t have the luxuries that the rich had like getting out on bail, or hiring good lawyers. Finally, this whole inequality within the prison system led to the movement of a more effective system