My father has been here since 1987 and my mother was here since 1993. So I’ve asked them, what was the subway like back then? I remember them telling me that instead of swiping, they paid with tokens, and instead of paying $2.75, they paid approximately $1. My father said that around 1987 he paid $1 per ride but by the time my mother had arrived in 1993, the fare had gone up. It gradually rose by 10 cents, then 15 cents, and then when it rose to $1.50 they introduced and replaced tokens with metrocards. Arguably, around this time period, the MTA was stated to be at its most dangerous point due to the peak of crack usage and crime being out of control. Subway stations and train carts were full of panhandlers and thieves praying for their next victim. Though there had been a makeover at one point to deep clean all the dirty trains and stations, these conditions do not sound much different than the ones we see today. Over time, poor capital planning led to the underfunding of the MTA which led to worsening conditions. This only makes subway fare inflation inevitable. Likewise, it is said that the MTA will plan for another fare hike some time in 2023 and possibly another one in 2025. One might wonder, why are we paying more for the same, if not, even worse conditions of this transit system?
To the current reader of this paper, it is likely that you reside in New York and regularly take the subway or bus for your daily commute to school or work. If not, it is probable that you have still experienced riding the train at least once in your life. But I think we can all agree that these aren’t the conditions we would like to keep seeing on a daily basis. For those like me, who solely rely on the MTA to commute to school and work everyday, it is clear that the MTA is in a crisis and is in need of additional funding. This is not even limited to the aesthetic aspects but growing up taking the bus and subway everywhere from as young as I can remember, there have been constant delays and hiccups in the system preventing me from getting to the places I need to be on a timely manner. The ongoing delays and unremitting overcrowding would drive any individual furious. It is not always possible to foresee the next subway delay, malfunction, or failure, leaving one with a sense of uncertainty as if they were to take a gamble each time they swipe the card. Just speaking from personal experience, with my current commute to school, I would have to take the bus 15 minutes to Union Square and debate if the weather is bad enough to take the train 1 stop to 23rd street. Sometimes I take the risk of swiping in, just to be met with a delay of 8 or more minutes which would have been half of my commute time from Union Square to school. In the event of a recurring pattern of tardiness, individuals may have to face disciplinary actions or even termination in the workplace. Similarly, students who arrive late to school may experience negative academic consequences from missing out on lectures or it can also leave a bad record and impact on their educational progress. Being a New Yorker, means there is a general expectation from everyone that we should all factor in an extra 10-15 minutes to ensure punctuality.
We are looking at a daily average of 5,437,587 riders every week (MTA). Despite having 472 stations, 36 rail lines, and 6418 cars as compared to Boston which only has 133 stations and 4 rail lines, the environment of the subway trains and stations differ greatly (Boddupalli et al. 192). The MBTA (Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority) has more consistent timing and organized scheduling due to their persistent and frequent checkups. Meanwhile, the MTA fails to accommodate their riders with the bare minimum of punctuality. There is clearly a lack of stability in the system. The MBTA stands out for its consistency with timing and organized scheduling, thanks to their regular checkups. The frequent maintenance and diligent monitoring of their system allows for smoother operations and increased reliability. On the other hand, the MTA is constantly criticized for failing to face their issues of aging infrastructure, high passenger volumes, and limited resources for maintenance and upgrades. This effort requires a continuous and large strategic investment plannings to ensure stability.
As a part of the 2020-2024 capital plan, the MTA will invest $54.8 billion to improve the transportation systems (MTA). Part of the plan amendment will replace “remaining 80-plus-year-old signal equipment and mechanical interlockings, prioritizing lines that serve essential workers in communities that rely on transit most” (Worrell). This comprehensive plan includes prioritizing replacing unreliable and problematic equipment on the lines that cater to essential worker and busier communities. The emphasis on upgrading signal equipment is an important step towards improving the overall efficiency, reliability, and safety of the system.
With the help of additional funding sources, the estimated revenue will be enough to support and satisfy our initial plan to renovate and improve outdated materials. A few possible sources could be Congestion pricing, Millionaire’s tax, Commuter tax, Carbon tax, or Corporate taxes. Congestion pricing as proposed by NBC, “would charge drivers for entering zones where there is heavy traffic, such as Manhattan south of Harlem during business hours” (NBC) and bring a revenue of $1.1 billion per year. This strategy aims to discourage private vehicle usage during rush hours and incentivize alternative modes of transportation. It essentially benefits both the transit system and the ecosystem as it is a more sustainable way of going around the city. Millionaire’s tax would help by “taxing individuals with incomes over $500,000 and couples with incomes over $1 million, the tax proposal is aimed at raising as much as $800 million annually…” (NYC GOV). This tax measure aims to generate significant revenue by targeting higher income earners so that it ensures those who are able to benefit the most financially, will contribute a fair share to the funding of public services. Implementing Millionaire’s tax could help alleviate some of the financial burdens the MTA have to face, thus allowing for more investments towards infrastructure. Next, the Commuter tax “taxed nonresidents who worked in the city 0.45 percent to 0.65 percent of their income” (IBO) and would initially bring in an additional $922 million per year. This tax plan implementation would generate a great amount of revenue and would be a financial boost for the MTA. It is on the fair side as some people have complained about the equity of these taxes. I believe that this tax rate is fair as those who commute and use the MTA service despite not living in the city should also contribute to the bettering of the public service. Following, “A carbon tax would increase the price of burning fossil fuels and any resulting goods and services” (Bloomberg) which could possibly contribute $7 billion per year. By imposing this tax, there would be greater investments directed towards finding sustainable transportation initiatives. This includes but is not limited to investing in renewable energy sources and promoting environmentally friendly practices within the transportation industry. Furthermore, the carbon tax would not only benefit the MTA by providing a financial resource but it would also help mitigate the environmental impact of transportation and play a role in the shift towards a more sustainable future. Finally, another proposed funding plan is through corporate taxes which would bring in a revenue of $9.6 billion per year. This focuses on the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation Mobility Tax (MCTMT) which only applies to certain employers conducting business in the metropolitan commuter transportation district. This district includes New York City, as well as Nassau, Dutchess, Suffolk, Rockland, Orange, Westchester counties, and Putnam. These funds generated from this tax implementation can be utilized towards various projects and initiatives aimed towards improving the overall experience for riders and residents.
Yet, a lot of these tax plans have received backlash from people, whether it be a concern about the fairness and equity of the taxes, perceived inefficiency, or alternative solutions. Like Mayor Eric Adams opposing Governor Hochul’s proposal. Adams fears that the proposal will be a burden to city taxpayers as they are already facing a number of financial challenges. One of the main reasons is lack of fairness, as the MTA serves not only New York City residents but those in surrounding areas as well. Placing the burden mainly onto city taxpayers would be seen as inequitable. Another point was made that individuals are already frustrated with the current state of the MTA’s infrastructure and services. Aforementioned, the unreliability and unpleasant conditions with such crowded trains, broken escalators, and dirty train cars, people question why they should be asked to pay more than what they have to if their expectations are not met already. Others have brought up the idea of rezoning as an alternative solution, which would be a form of land value capture as developers who are allowed to, “build high-density apartment buildings in once-low density areas, and leverages the additional profits raised from that to require (relatively) affordable housing units be built within them” (Surico). This could be seen in Brooklyn’s Gowanus neighborhood where upzoning is taken into consideration. Developers would be able to build 22 story buildings in the area and in theory, those funds could be utilized to enhance the systems nearby like the F and G lines. Similarly, another excellent exemplification of this case could be the Grand Central Terminal. When the de Blasio administration rezoned the Midtown East area for the building of One Vanderbilt Avenue, more attention was placed on the older stations surrounding the area. The developer paid, “$220 million to the MTA, two-thirds of which will go to improve the issue of overcrowding in and around the main terminal” (Surico). One advantage of this idea would be the fact that these improvements are made possible from private investments as the city’s public funds are insufficient due to the high demand of the city.
Ultimately, with all the possible funding sources, we can anticipate a better and more trustworthy MTA transportation system. What New Yorkers could look forward to is a faster, more accessible, and reliable transportation network. There entails more frequent service and reduced crowding, quicker travel times, expanded network capacity which would reach a broader range of communities across the region, and lastly, increased environmental sustainability and resiliency.
As of now, we shall all continue doing our parts of paying the $2.75 fare because it is mandatory. However, if it is burdensome to low-income families, there is the reduced fare metrocard assistance to help alleviate the financial strain. Families can visit the Fair Fares website to get approved and shipped the half fare metrocard. Furthermore, we can all be good samaritans and collectively take a role to reduce waste in our environment, which will make traveling a more enjoyable experience for everyone.
Through the collective cooperation and efforts to support the community, we can eventually flip the system to our desirable goal of a comfortable transit system.
Works Cited
Bigger, Patrick, and Nate Millington. “Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space.” Getting soaked? Climate crisis, adaptation finance, and racialized austerity, vol. 3, no. 3, 2019, pp. 601-623. Sagepub, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2514848619876539?casa_token=MqqRuTPKwn0AAAAA:TYs9SaR1UnGvP98-Se7M4ckw97gaursfdHOkdGc8l465lFZtAHxzHOiBxMHBZaqoBLKFbouH4sip.
Boddupalli, Sreekar Shashank, et al. “Transportation Research Record.” Maintrainenance: Keeping Heavy Rail Maintenance on Track, vol. 2673, no. 7, 2019, pp. 192-203. Sagepub, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0361198119827533?journalCode=trra.
Fair Fares NYC. “Fair Fares NYC.” NYC.gov, 2019, https://www.nyc.gov/site/fairfares/index.page. Accessed 19 May 2023.
Independence Budget Office of the City of New York. “Budget Options for New York City – Revenue: Adjusting the Personal Income Tax.” Independent Budget Office, 2019, https://ibo.nyc.ny.us/iboreports/budgetoptions-2023-adjusting-the-personal-income-tax.html. Accessed 18 May 2023.
MTA. “Subway and bus ridership for 2021 – New York City Transit.” MTA, -, https://new.mta.info/agency/new-york-city-transit/subway-bus-ridership-2021. Accessed 15 May 2023.
MTA. “2020-2024 MTA Capital Program.” MTA, 2022, https://new.mta.info/capital/2020CapitalProgram. Accessed 18 May 2023.
NYC GOV. “Mayor de Blasio Proposes “Fair Fix” Tax on Wealthiest New Yorkers to Modernize Subways and Buses.” NYC.gov, 7 August 2017, https://www.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/539-17/mayor-de-blasio-proposes-fair-fix-tax-wealthiest-new-yorkers-modernize-subways-buses-#/0. Accessed 20 May 2023.
Siff, Andrew, and Tracie Strahan. “NYC Congestion Pricing: Tolling Plan Offers Deep Driver Discounts.” NBC New York, 12 May 2023, https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/nyc-congestion-pricing-plan-includes-toll-cuts-for-taxis-night-drivers/4328327/. Accessed 20 May 2023.
Surico, John. “5 Ways to Help Fund the MTA’s New York City Subway Fix.” Bloomberg.com, 2 January 2019, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-02/5-ways-to-help-fund-the-mta-s-new-york-city-subway-fix. Accessed 20 May 2023.
Tankus, Nathan. “John Jay’s Finest.” The Declining Quality Of The New York City Subway, vol. 34, no. 1, 2019, pp. 38-40. John Jay, http://jjay.cuny.edu/sites/default/files/contentgroups/office_studentresearch_creativity/34th_jj_finest_2019_0.pdf#page=44.
Woodhouse, Skylar. “New York’s MTA Looks to Cut Carbon Footprint 85% by 2040.” Bloomberg.com, 20 April 2023, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-04-20/new-york-s-mta-looks-to-cut-carbon-emissions-footprint-85-by-2040#xj4y7vzkg. Accessed 19 May 2023.
Worrell, Carolina. “NY MTA Proposes Amendment to 2020-24 Capital Program.” Railway Age, 26 July 2022, https://www.railwayage.com/passenger/ny-mta-proposes-amendment-to-2020-24-capital-program/. Accessed 20 May 2023.