Search Results for “interview with Olga Ten”

By Alexandra Ten

The following oral history interview formed the basis for Ten’s essay, “Owners and inferiors: Influence of Nationalism on the Lives of Ethnic Minorities in the Post-Soviet Uzbekistan.”

Interview with Olga Ten

What were the first changes in your life when the Soviet Union collapsed and Uzbekistan became an independent country?

When the Soviet Union collapsed and Uzbekistan gained independence, I was in the middle of my sophomore year in the medical university in Kazan, Russia. Due to my Uzbek citizenship, I, among other students from Uzbekistan, was forced to leave Russia and go back to my home country. Suddenly, we became aliens in our former fellow country and nobody wanted to see us there studying in local universities anymore. Luckily for us, a few hundred students from three medical universities in Kazan were divided into several groups and admitted into the first medical university in Tashkent, Uzbekistan to the same year as we were in Kazan, so we did not have to apply as freshmen. Nevertheless, we were not welcomed there either. As Russian-speaking students without proper knowledge of Uzbek, we were required to retake all of the exams we had already passed in Kazan because they wanted to check everything we had studied so far. Even the Dean of Students explicitly indicated his negative attitude towards us and once said: “We don’t need you, Russians, here, and we’ll try to cut you out by the end of the year.”

How did the policy of nationalism in Uzbekistan affect both your everyday life and the process of studying in the medical university?

Well, most of the locals, i.e. Uzbeks, were radically opposed to ethnic minorities such as Russians, Tatars, Koreans, Jews and Armenians. Professors in my university used to mark down their grades including mine (although I studied both medicine and Uzbek language really hard and then spoke it fluently). When we took the exams, they would always ask us something completely irrelevant to the topic of the exam, whereas the locals received good grades without a proper understanding of medicine. For example, some Uzbeks in my university asked me if humans had 4-chamber hearts or not and then I wondered: how could they treat patients if they did not know the basic knowledge of medicine, or its very “alphabet”? As for my everyday life, locals used to insult minorities in different ways: they would often shout “return to your Russia”, or a bus driver would not stop at the station if there were only non-Uzbeks.

What difficulties in seeking employment did you face after you graduated from the medical university?

Right after I graduated, I was enrolled into an internship (i.e. medical residency in the US) but only because hospitals were required by universities to allow students complete the internship in order to obtain the official title of “doctor.” I studied hard and I did my best to show my professional skills and ability to work while I was an intern and soon, I was offered the position of neurologist. But my example is one of the few exceptions: most of the minorities could not find a job after an internship and locals occupied the positions. For instance, my little brother, who is two years younger than me, became a doctor-ophthalmologist too, but could not find any work in hospitals. He was so desperate to make some money that he agreed to work in a private optical shop as a consultant that even did not require a medical degree.

How do you think locals found jobs so easily without proper knowledge and qualification contrary to the employment difficulties ethnic minorities faced?

Most of them were able to find jobs (not only in the medical field, but in engineering or teaching as well) just because of their true, Uzbek, ethnic background and also their knowledge of the Uzbek language that became official after the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, sometimes even locals did not know Uzbek well and they often asked me to help them write medical charts and diagnoses in professional Uzbek. Everybody perfectly understood that their network among locals strengthened after Uzbekistan became independent and they used all of their connections to build a career.

Did you feel comfortable at your new working place or did you feel oppressed by locals?

I did not feel either comfortable or secure at the hospital where I started my career. We faced an ultimatum to learn Uzbek in as little time as possible, otherwise, we would be replaced with locals. Some people did not even get a chance to learn the language. For example, elderly hospital workers were fired immediately because everybody was sure they could not learn the language quickly. After some time spent in the hospital, I was able to obtain a position in the research institute, but soon I was transferred to the Department of Medical Statistics by my new manager, where I had no interaction with patients at all. He explained his decision by saying that there were no prospects for me there and I should forget about my career as the Candidate of Science (i.e. Doctor of Philosophy) because no Korean would ever be able to get a doctorate. After that, I decided to quit but the head of the institute did not even let me do that. He wanted to use me as a good and professional employee without any prospect of promotion. So I stayed and tried to save some money because I knew there were no other opportunities for me outside of the research institute.

Despite your employment in the hospital and in the research institute, what other difficulties did you and your family face after the collapse of the Soviet Union?

The collapse of the Soviet Union made soviet ruble (Russian money) completely worthless. All of the money that my parents had been saving for me and my brother lost its price and the new currency called the Uzbekistani som was created. If, for example, before 1993 when the government started issuing soms, a few thousand rubles were considered to be a good fortune, after 1993, we were able to buy only some bread with this amount of money. Banks officially stopped giving saved money to us, and we lost all the money in our bank accounts. What’s worse, both my parents were fired because they did not speak the Uzbek language and were then replaced by locals. My father had to give up the idea that he would be able to find a position as an engineer, and agreed to work as a helper in a shop for an extremely low salary.

When did you first think of migrating from Uzbekistan?

When we were forced to go back to Uzbekistan in my sophomore year, I wanted to actually return to Kazan in order to graduate there, but I could not do that so I had no other choice but to stay. A year or so after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the majority of my classmates left Uzbekistan for Germany, Israel and the USA. However, those were mostly Jews or others, who already had relatives abroad, and I understood that I had to figure out another way to escape from this terror.

What do you think were the most crucial reasons of your decision to leave the country?

I simply saw no future either for my family or for my future children there. My father then told me: “You can get married but you must not have children because you will give birth to slaves” and I agreed with him. A low salary blended with difficulties at work, and the discriminative attitude of locals also made my life much more stressful and I was often explicitly told that I had no chances to build a career. I was so depressed by being mistreated even though I had a good education and the diploma of a doctor – just like any other local. What’s more, we were afraid for our lives because, as I already mentioned, Uzbeks often insulted us and we were scared that one day they would physically hurt us. We no longer felt protected and safe in our home country, so I made a decision to leave that terrible place.

Did you ever hesitate whether you should stay after you made this decision? And were you ready to sacrifice everything including job and saved money and move into a country a thousand miles away from your family?

I never thought twice about my decision to leave Uzbekistan for the United States. I wanted to emigrate no matter what it would cost me. I knew so many people who had moved there and became happy. Once I got my business visa and bought a ticket, I was sure I was never coming back. I perfectly understood that I had to begin a new life in a strange country where I had no family or friends, but the living conditions in Uzbekistan were so severe that they made me leave everything I had accomplished behind. In 1999, when I came to New York City with one suitcase and only five hundred dollars in my pocket, I was determined to build a new life in a secure and safe place where my family and future children could prosper and be happy.

By Alexandra Ten

Alexandra Ten’s oral history analysis was written for History 1003 and nominated for publication by Emily Long Olsen, a Baruch Writing Center Consultant. This essay is the analysis portion of a larger oral history project based in part on an interview with Olga Ten.

Photo credit

“Nation” can be defined as an imaginary community in which members consider themselves as a distinctive group of people who share common traditions, hold common values and speak a common language (Class Lecture, March 2^nd). Advocates of nationalism inspired people to work together in order to establish states based on the nation (Traditions and Encounters, 481). Sometimes, the more strongly nationalists identify themselves with a distinctive group of people, the more they become distant from minorities within their own nation, thus fueling conflicts (Traditions and Encounters, 482). For example, after the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 and Uzbekistan declared its independence, Uzbekistan immediately started promoting nationalism and emphasizing the strength of the dominant ethnic group – Uzbeks – while neglecting non-Uzbeks^{^[1]}. What’s more, the separation of Uzbekistan from the USSR caused disastrous economic difficulties in the Uzbek economy: the country experienced a crash in the industrial section while the creation of a new Uzbek currency, the som, only exacerbated the situation. People’s savings in Russian rubles lost their value and banks did not work properly to fix this problem (Ten). Ethnic oppression of minorities combined with overall economic decline pushed millions of Uzbek citizens to leave Uzbekistan. My aunt Olga’s story illustrates the ethnic minority experience in Uzbekistan at the time. Olga, who now lives in New York City and works in a medical office, had no other choice but to migrate from her home country, Uzbekistan, to the United States. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, she was left with no job opportunities and was oppressed by Uzbeks only because she was Korean. As her life experience in Uzbekistan from 1991 to 1999 shows, complicated negative consequences of nationalism and overall economic decline deteriorated living conditions of ethnic minorities and resulted in their mass migrations from their home country.

Firstly, after Uzbekistan became independent, locals were given a great number of privileges, including preference in employment over ethnic minorities. According to the interview I conducted with my aunt, who migrated from Uzbekistan in 1999 to the USA, “most of the [non-Uzbeks] could not find a job after a [medical] internship and locals occupied the positions” (Ten). Despite equality of education and levels of qualification, Uzbeks had advantages over minorities because of their authentic Uzbek heritage. In consequence, discrimination followed my aunt even after she fought her way to the position of graduate student at a research institute. Once her manager, who was Uzbek, saw her potential and professional skills, he transferred her to the department that offered no real interaction with patients at all. He justified his decision by saying that “no Korean would be able to get a doctorate” and that she should forget about her career forever (Ten). Despite my aunt’s honors diploma, her knowledge of the Uzbek language, and her ambition to learn, nobody ever mentioned the possibility of her promotion; after fruitless efforts to quit, she decided to hold on to the position because she knew there were no better opportunities for her in the job market.

Another example of Uzbeks’ privileges in employment was provided by an engineer, who was interviewed in 2002 by the scholar Scott Radnitz. In the department where the engineer worked, the board of executives picked an Uzbek for the position of deputy simply because there was a requirement to place one of the locals despite the fact that “his knowledge . . . was absolutely nonexistent” (Weighing the Political and Economic Motivations for Migration in Post-Soviet Space: The Case of Uzbekistan, 666).

What’s worse, after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Uzbek authorities changed the status of languages: Uzbek replaced Russian as the official language of Uzbekistan. Rejection of Russian was a tool to demonstrate independence from the former USSR and the sovereignty of the new country. A special institution called The Uzbek Terminology Committee was created in order to control the translation of public places from Russian to the Uzbek language, such as renaming the subway station “Gorky” (which in Russian means “bitter”) to the Uzbek “Great Silk Road.” This minimized the use of Russian, even though minorities and some ethnic Uzbeks spoke Uzbek badly or did not speak it at all (Nation-Building in Uzbekistan, 30).

In the workplace, the Russian-speaking population “faced the ultimatum to learn Uzbek in as little time as possible, otherwise, [they] would be replaced with locals” (Ten). Despite this promise, employees were able to find other ways to eliminate minorities at work and made a decision to not even give this opportunity and time to senior staff. Instead, they were fired. For instance, both my aunt’s parents lost their jobs because they did not speak Uzbek although they occupied high-level jobs: her father was an engineer in a factory and her mother was a human resources manager (Ten). Even though locals that replaced minorities at work were assumed to know both domestic and professional Uzbek, some of them were not as proficient as they were supposed to be. As my aunt remarked, “they often asked me to help them write medical charts and diagnoses in a professional Uzbek language” (Ten). Thus, the policy of nationalism created a working environment where ethnic minorities simply did not have access to jobs they were educated for and where only locals could expect promotions. Ethnic Uzbeks gained high wages even though they lacked necessary knowledge and professional skills.

Secondly, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, radical nationalistic ideas among Uzbeks fueled ethnic conflicts such that minorities were considered “outsiders” and were severely oppressed by locals. According to an economist quoted in the Radnitz article, upon gaining independence, Uzbeks acquired a sense of ownership. This was true even for the younger generation which, according to oriental custom, was supposed to show respect for elders of any ethnicity. Uzbeks were sure they were becoming owners of the country and its citizens while others should be treated as inferiors (Weighing the Political and Economic Motivations for Migration in Post-Soviet Space: The Case of Uzbekistan, 663). For example, when my aunt came back from Russia to Uzbekistan in 1991, the Dean of Students in the medical university told her and other Russian-speaking students: “We don’t need you, Russians, here, and we’ll try to cut you out by the end of the year” (Ten). Even though my aunt was a very hard-working student and spoke Uzbek fluently, “professors in [her] university used to mark down [her] grades” and would always ask extremely difficult and irrelevant questions on the exams so non-Uzbeks would fail (Ten). In the meantime, locals got good grades even without the necessary quality of knowledge due to their connections to the dominant group. As an example of their incompetence, some Uzbeks even asked my aunt how many chambers a human heart had (Ten); this question showed that these students, who did not know the basics of medicine, would easily find jobs in the future because of their privileges whereas minorities struggled with low employment opportunities. Uzbeks used extended family connections and personal networks in their community for favors, especially, in the workplace. Some scholars refer to this favoritism as nepotism and even “clannishness” (Weighing the Political and Economic Motivations for Migration in Post-Soviet Space: The Case of Uzbekistan, 666). For example, as my aunt mentioned in the interview, after her brother graduated from the medical university with a high GPA and an ophthalmology degree but without powerful “friends” or relatives, he could only find a job in the optical shop, which did not even require the professional skills of a certified doctor (Ten).

Finally, locals’ negative attitudes toward ethnic minorities and the country’s financial situation deteriorated so much that people simply started leaving the country^{^[2]}. As my aunt said, “the majority of [her] classmates left Uzbekistan for Germany, Israel, and the USA” in the years following the collapse of the USSR because they could no longer cope with the financial and psychological difficulties they faced as minorities. As Scott Radnitz discovered in his research about migrants’ motivations to leave Uzbekistan, 68% of his interviewees reported that their living standards had declined after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Almost half of the research participants named “low standard of living” as their main reason to migrate and about a quarter answered “children’s future” (670). My aunt’s words reinforce these statistics. Her most crucial reason for leaving the country was that she “saw no future either for [her] family or for [her] children there;” she agreed with her father who once told her that if she had children, she would “give birth to slaves” (Ten). Due to the unstable economy and the fact that they were restrained from job opportunities because of their ethnicities, members of ethnic minorities could not secure theirs and their families’ futures. As my aunt’s experience shows, minorities were very often mistreated and underrated in the workplace, even despite their talents and desire to work hard, because their Uzbek employers had all the power. She described her living conditions after the collapse of the Soviet Union by saying: “Low salary blended with difficulties at work and the discriminatory attitude of locals made my life much more stressful” (Ten). Indeed, the situation became so severe that she was determined to leave her home country with one suitcase and only five hundred dollars in her pocket, no matter what difficulties she would face in the US.

Ultimately, my aunt’s testimony reveals the truth behind the newly independent country, Uzbekistan, which used the policy of nationalism to strengthen the position of its dominant ethnic group. Uzbeks identified themselves as a special and separate group from others and their negative attitudes towards minorities made non-Uzbeks feel inferior to them. Uzbeks gained preference in employment that prevented others from finding a suitable and fairly paid job. Overall economic decline and the struggle of the country to implement the currency, som, only exacerbated living conditions for ethnic minorities. Just as my aunt could not fulfill her goal of getting a PhD in medicine or her brother could not develop himself as an ophthalmologist, thousands of people became unemployed without any prospects for the future. They were discriminated against and oppressed in a country with an extremely unstable economy and had no other choice but to leave their home country because the difficulties they would face in another place, they thought, would be incomparable to those they had experienced in Uzbekistan.

Endnotes

^{^[1]} By non-Uzbeks, I mean ethnic minorities such as Russians (which was the biggest minority group), Koreans, Armenians, Jews and others.

^{^[2]} As an example of the propaganda of Uzbekistan’s national pride, a number of slogans were written on buildings in the Uzbek language: “we are not inferior to anybody” or “Uzbekistan is a country with a great future” (Weighing the Political and Economic Motivations for Migration in Post-Soviet Space: The Case of Uzbekistan, 658)

Works Cited

Akbarzadeh, Shahram. “Nation-Building in Uzbekistan.” Central Asian Survey 15.1 (1996): 23-32. Print.

Bentley, Jerry H., Herbert F. Ziegler, and Heather E. Streets-Salter. Traditions and Encounters: A Brief Global History. 3rd ed. Vol. 2. N.p.: McGraw Hill, 2014. 481-82. Print.

Nguyen, Martina T. “Nations, Nationalism, Nation-States.” Baruch College. New York City. 2 Mar. 2015. Lecture.

Radnitz, Scott. “Weighing the Political and Economic Motivations for Migration in Post-Soviet Space: The Case of Uzbekistan.” Europe-Asia Studies 58.5 (2006): 653-77. Print.

Ten, Olga. Personal interview. 11 Apr. 2015.

Published December 7, 2015

Interview with Olga Ten

Owners and Inferiors: Influence of nationalism on the lives of ethnic minorities in the post-Soviet Uzbekistan

Endnotes

Works Cited

Photo credit: “File:Uzbekistan regions map.png” by Peter Fitzgerald is licensed under CC BY 3.0

Search Results for: interview with Olga Ten

Endnotes

Works Cited

Photo credit: “File:Uzbekistan regions map.png” by Peter Fitzgerald is licensed under CC BY 3.0

Contact