Monthly Archives: September 2014

The Rhetorical Situation

Bitzer identifies that rhetoric writing deals with the context. The context can be developed through exigence, audience, and the constraints. He wants you to be able to identify the importance of a piece of writing, the target readers, and any limits the piece may have. The context can change as the piece goes on as will the audience with it. Writing is usually rhetoric because it is a response to some issue or problem.

I really enjoyed reading this piece but at times it was difficult for me to follow. Something I realized as I read that is order for the situation to work all the steps have to be done correctly. It is as if you have to meet a certain criteria to respond to an issue or problem.

Emma Watson’s Speech:

Exigence: The equality of the sexes. Ending the negative connotations that go along with the word “Feminist.” Tackling women’s rights to being paid equally and equal treatment in all aspects of life. The double standards men suffer because of their gender.

Audience: I think the audience she was targeting was really all men and women. I believe she was trying to target any person in any place because this issue touches on everyone. The misconception people have is that feminism is only about woman and it its not it deals with gender equality therefore anyone male or woman can be a feminist.

Constraints: In this speech I believe that constraint is Emma Watson herself. Many people may not take her seriously due to her profession. Also she doesn’t really discuss how to resolve this issue she just speaks about the campaign briefly.

 

IngratiNicole_Writer’sStoryFinal.dox

The Critic Inside Me by Nicole Ingrati

I completely re constructed my writer’s letter. The reason I completely changed

that was because I do not think I completely understood what the purpose of that letter

was. I then realized that we are suppose to talk about what our thought process was while

we were coming up with our story. This was something quite challenging for me because

I do not typically talk about my writing process. When I am writing something I usually

get stuck in the moment and I cannot always recall what I was thinking while I was

writing. I always like to take on new challenges so I think that this has helped me not just

act in the moment but really take time and think before I write.

I didn’t change my story at all because I felt as though the reader could

understand the message I was trying to send and could therefore relate to my piece. I

made small grammatical changes to the best of my ability as my fellow peers told me.

I am sure that their will always be some grammatical errors in my writing but I am still

learning and mistakes make who we are as writers and people. As far as the context of the

story that remained as the original simply because I as the author was very happy about

the way it came out and in my opinion if something isn’t broken you don’t fix it.

Also another big issue I realized I have in this piece (and in most pieces) is that

I write the way I speak. This can sometimes be a good thing but in this case I needed to

let my writing speak for itself instead over explaining or over analyzing. When I speak to

someone a sentence I would use is “What I mean to say is…” I think that I do not need to

write that because as I said before you shouldn’t have to explain the writing should speak

for itself.

The Critic Inside Me by Nicole Ingrati

Dear Lisa,

Something I really want you to focus on while you are reading this is that I didn’t

always enjoy writing until fairly recently. What I had in mind for my reader is that not

only talking about my journey as a writer but also trying to make them understand that

we all have a purpose for why we write no matter what we are writing about. It could be

anything from a school assignment like this one or a simple text message. The first

question I posed to myself was: When were you actually excited about writing? That is

where my story began, and of course that was in college. Once I figured out what

experience I wanted to write about it became a little easier to organize the rest of my

story. I stress a little!

Next I thought to myself what is the overall message you are trying to send to

your readers? I wanted to touch on the subject of students or people in general being their

own worst enemy or in this case their own worse critic. I thought about the many times I

told myself you can’t do this and I said to myself I am sure you are not the only one who

feels this way. I wanted to construct a piece that anyone who was reading it could relate

or at least the majority for that matter.

I tend to be very organized in many aspects of my life but something I struggle

with ironically is organizing my writing and making it easy to understand, but most

importantly, creating what I like to call the flow. If your writing does not flow chances

are that its not going to be easy to understand and therefore your readers will not want to

continue or even attempt to try and make out what you are saying.

Finally what I always seem to struggle with is the conclusion of any piece of

writing. I wanted to get my readers to continue thinking about there own criticizing. I

The Critic Inside Me by Nicole Ingrati

thought to myself how do I wrap this up in a way that is not boring and keeps my readers

thinking even after they have heard my paper? Do I summarize the main points? Do I end

with a question or a quote? These questions are still unanswered for me and I hope that as

I continue my writing journey I will one day figure out.

Writer’s Story:

Why do we read? Why do we write? The simple answer to that is because we

have a voice and because we all have our opinions. No matter what the issue or task is

you either agree or disagree. Once I realized this I let the critic in me loose. I had not

always thought of writing as a way of expressing myself and letting my voice be heard.

I use to despise any writing assignment I had to do no matter what it was. The day I

became a writer was when I finally understood that what I say matters. That of course

came in the middle of my college career.

I was in my last semester at Kingsborough and I was taking an English class

that dealt solely with Shakespeare. In the beginning of the semester the critic in me

thought how could your writing mean anything when compared to the great works of

Shakespeare? Lucky for me I was learning how to tune out that negative voice in my

head and I had a great professor whom I will never forget. Throughout the semester

we had to create and respond to blog posts that had to do with whatever play we were

reading. The professor would select two of use to pose a question or thought and let

everyone else would write a response and she would not get involved. This was the first

time in my writing experience that I had a real audience not just a professor. I liked the

idea of being to speak freely with my classmates. It was in that class that I began to let go

The Critic Inside Me by Nicole Ingrati

and write exactly what I thought and how I felt.

Throughout that semester I would respond to blog posts that my fellow classmates

started and eventually I got my own chance to create a thread. You could imagine

how nervous I was. Everyone in my entire class is going to not only see my writing

but also analyze and comment on it. The discussion I started was on Act 5 of the play

The Merchant of Venice. Although I was nervous I did not hold back and in the end it

paid off. Not only did the professor believe I brought up a good argument a lot of my

classmates felt the same. From this point on I had less of a fear of writing.

The reason I think I enjoyed writing those blog posts was because in my opinion

there was less pressure. What I mean to say is that when I know my professor is going to

read and critique my pieces of writing I become my own worst critic and tried to make

everything perfect. With the blog posts I was free to share my thoughts through writing

but not by trying to fit this idea of the perfect paper but rather by being myself and

expressing my thoughts to my peers.

The final turning point for me as a writer came in that same semester in

our final project. The task was as follows: we were to take one of the plays that we read

(our favorite) and cast the play. Once again this posed a challenge because there was that

little critic in my head that kept saying how could you write anything worthwhile? You

are no Shakespeare? Yet again I had to silence myself and think about the overall

message that Shakespeare was trying to portray and how it is still relevant today. I had to

cast the play and I was allowed to make minor changes as well. The important thing to do

was to explain why I did what I did. This was a big project and I had to break down piece

by piece. The play I choose to focus on was Othello. The reason I choose Othello was

The Critic Inside Me by Nicole Ingrati

because not only had we just read it (so it was fresh in my mind) but also I felt as though

it was still relevant today. I realized that not everyone was going to understand my

mindset so I really tried to write it in a way that everyone could understand so I set the

play in modern times. Doing this project helped me realize that as a writer you are

suppose to express yourself and not everyone will always agree with you and that’s okay.

The purpose of writing in my opinion is to relay some type of message and to of course

share your thoughts with your audience. As long has your message has been heard you

have been a successful writer.

My views of writing have changed and I am sure they are going to continue to

change as I grow as a student and eventually as I develop in my future career. The sheer

thought of writing use to cause me nothing but disappointment. I used to be my own

worst critic in trying to live up to an idea. When I finally realized that writing is about

expression I was able to silence that critic and help better develop my writing capability.

If it wasn’t for that Shakespeare class I highly doubt I would have had the views on

writing that I do today. I have come to recognize that although that little critical voice

in my head was negative it also pushed me to become a better writer. I wanted to prove

myself wrong and show that I was very capable of writing many great pieces.

Ferguson Article Comparison

Fox News Piece

main argument: focusing on educational aspect and how it has affected the students, raises the concern of their safety  in the U.S.

purpose: prevent future incidents such as this by informing students of the history of inequality against colored races

intended audience: parents, school officials

secondary audience: members of the community, people who read the newspaper

exigence: racial inequality

brief cultural context: shooting  of Brown

the constraints: they did not include the public point of view (a lot of assumptions)

appeals:

logos: whether schools should talk about the Ferguson incident

ethos: references to secondary information and official reports

pathos:

Democracy Now:

main argument: whether or not federal government should be involved

purpose: police brutality has been more severe with federal support backed by the president

intended audience: local community, people who follow political news

secondary audience: students

exigence: racial inequality

brief cultural context: shooting  of Brown

the constraints: it does not look at the point of view of the branches apart from the presidential

 

 

 

Response to What is Rhetoric 9/16/14

I agree with Miller and i feel that in order to be a successful rhetoric writer you must consider all aspects of rhetoric writing. Ethos, Pathos, Logos and Style all work in hand in hand in creating rhetoric writing. When writing you cannot forgot to use one because then you are not really being persuasive. You must consider all dynamics of writing for your reader to really grasp what your overall message is.