• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The Paw Print

A news publication created by Baruch's College Now high school journalism class

  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyles
  • Culture and Entertainment
  • Commentary
  • Staff
  • About

Archives for August 2016

LIFEFORCE Takes Tribeca

August 8, 2016 by j.ward1 Leave a Comment

 

 

 

Screen Shot 2016-08-10 at 1.06.51 PM

TriBeCa, New York City’s new exhibit, LIFEFORCE invades the city with feminist style art and moscato.

 

Photographers, journalists, hipsters, artists, family and friends from around the city came to see the premier of the new exhibit- LIFEFORCE at the minimalist art gallery, untitled-space NYC.

 

LIFEFORCE was assembled by 24 young female artist and curated by the Bennet sisters, Kelsey and Rèmy.

 

All of the pieces present feature exclusive to the female body like lactating breasts, estrogen and progesterone and perfect imperfections.

 

From the murmurs of the crowd you could hear the divide between hipster chicks and classic art enthusiasts.

 

“This is what we call art now?!” one said.

 

“She basically said ‘free the nipple’ with watercolor, sans the words.” another connected.

 

Some found it hard to believe what classifies as art or were amazed by the simplicity and manipulation of realistic depictions of the body used to rebuke misogynistic ideas embedded into pop culture.

 

Attendees Julia Bowen, 15 and Sharlana Ahmed,16, escaped the densely packed studio, as they realized that they disturbed the art pieces. The chairs and the hand sanitizer were not for use.

 

Deception at its finest.

 

If you did not pay attention to the captions, you too would’ve sat in sweat, tears, urine and synthetic female hormones or missed the connection between hands and sanitation with the UV lit and dead skin infused sanitizer.

 

There were many other intriguing displays, captivating personal struggle with religion, pregnancy, and self acceptance, along with vivid photographs and dioramas.

 

Official statements and descriptions of all of the pieces from the artists are at untitled-space.com.

 

LIFEFORCE is open to the public, free and with art available for purchase, between the dates 7/26- 8/6.
[contact-form][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Website’ type=’url’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]

Filed Under: Culture and Entertainment, Manhattan, News

Heatwave at Baruch

August 8, 2016 by LAN FAN CAI Leave a Comment

A heatwave hit New York on July, 25 and 26 and inconvenienced people at the Baruch College. At the same time, it was mandatory for the college to cut electricity usage in the school.

Baruch participates in an Energy Demand Response program which requires City Universities of New York or CUNYS to “reduce energy consumption significantly” during heatwaves to prevent brownouts or blackouts in the city. The college reduces electricity consumption by turning off elevator/escalator services during certain times of the day, raising temperatures to reduce air conditioner usage and turning off lights.

The reduction of energy affected a lot of students who were quite used to the services and comfort the school provides. One student angrily described how she was late to class since she was “unable to take the elevators.”  Another one describes how it was “unbearably hot” in the classrooms since the air conditioners weren’t turned on to full power.

On the flip side, some people like Louis Li a student in the school said “I went through the day as normal and I didn’t even notice the heat or escalators not working.”

Participation in the Energy Demand Response program is good for the environment and the city, so questions remain why the college  doesn’t do more to curtail energy use throughout the year or even just the summer.

Often when you enter the college in the summer, the air is much too cold and energy is wasted on lights in halls nobody uses or elevators nobody is using. Perhaps the school should try to conserve more energy like they do during heatwaves in order to benefit the environment.

 

Filed Under: Mahattan, News

Body Image Affects All

August 8, 2016 by Melissa Leave a Comment

In today’s society, not only women, but men too try to conform to a certain body type. People do this because they want to be feel accepted.

Just because a women does not have an hourglass figure with small hips and a slim stomach does not mean she is not beautiful. If a man does not have broad shoulders and a slim waist, that does not make him any less attractive. Society has shoved us into such a small spectrum; they cannot feed on anything else but its own conformities.

Businesses have advertisements that try to sell based on the issues men and women have with body image. They use photoshop and skinny models to try and get people to feel insecure, which makes them want to use their products. These advertisers use body image insecurities to make profits on their products.

According to CSWD.org, “80% of 10-year-old girls have dieted. 90% of high school junior and senior women diet regularly. Young girls are more afraid of becoming fat than they are of nuclear war, cancer, or losing their parents.”

Body image has taken an unhealthy turn on our society, but most people do not look at it as a serious health factor. According to The National Association of Anorexia Nervosa and Associated Disorders, “3% of the total population suffer from eating disorders”. Usually eating disorders are because of an insecurity in body image, which eats at people’s self esteem until they feel like there is  no other option. The body boundaries are so tight in this society people can never feel proud of themselves.

Body image issues have a huge impact on our everyday lives and are important in our society. You are beautiful the way you are, do not let photoshop tell you otherwise.

Filed Under: Commentary

Snap, Snap, Woof!

August 6, 2016 by Brandy Sarabia Leave a Comment

Teens using Snapchat Filters
(Top left to right) Brenda Sarabia and Nazim Polash, Brandy Sarabia, and Laysha Castillo (bottom left to right) Derek Holmes, Sam Wilby, and Lisandra Pereyra

 

It’s here, it’s the second best thing sweeping the nation (aside from Pokémon Go), it’s the one, the only, snapchat filters.

According to Tech Insider, Snapchat introduced “filters” on September, 2015. These “filters” give twist to selfies. Snapchat added 8 great filters, including but not limited to, heart eyes, rainbow vomit, old guy, eyes popping out, and the sweetheart filter. But what makes these Snapchat filters so popular among ages?

The answer; because they’re fun and they make you look attractive.

“People use filters in order to feel physically better about themselves. When using a snapchat filter, things are enhanced in a way that makes you appear beautiful, thus you feel beautiful in return,” says Brenda Sarabia, an eighteen-year-old freshman at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

Brenda has been using Snapchat filters since they were first introduced into Snapchat. She explains that filters not only make you look completely different, they also grab people’s attention.“Hell, I love getting compliments from my pictures, and if a filter increases those comments, I’m down. I’d rather use a filter than be half-naked like 99% of Instagram users.”

And while some people do use these filters for the pleasure of some favorable comments, we have people who use it for entertainment.

“It’s just mindless entertainment. Most of the time you’re taking pictures you won’t even send”, says Samuel Wilby, a sixteen-year-old junior at QUEST High School. Samuel uses Snapchat filters, “usually just to pass the time (or procrastinate on my case) because there’s clearly not much to get out of it, but I’ll do it anyways”.

Not only are Snapchat filters used among average people, but celebrities such as Jimmy Fallon and Ariana Grande used these filters as a way to entertain themselves. According to People magazine, Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon collaborated July 14 to create an astonishing, yet hilarious lip sync video to Ariana’s hit song Into You using Snapchat Filters and was aired on The Tonight Show.

So whether Snapchat filters are for entertainment or for the luxury of looking ten times gorgeous, these filters have been given their popularity fair and square. So the next time you take a selfie, make sure you grab your puppy filter.

Filed Under: Culture and Entertainment, Featured, Lifestyles

Review: “Mr. Robot” Says “Control is an Illusion”

August 4, 2016 by Troy Smith Leave a Comment

Elliot doesn’t comply. Mr. Robot (Christian Slater) moves closer, revealing a gun. Elliot (Rami Malek) remains in place, sitting on his bed.

Mr. Robot pulls the gun up to eye level. He points the muzzle between Elliott’s eyes and pulls the trigger. Blood splatters all over the wall. There’s a hole in his head.

Sam Esmail kicks off the second season of Mr. Robot pulling no punches. Esmail immediately submerges his audience into a fairly unfamiliar environment filled with new characters and new occurrences.

While new elements are added to the show, the general ideas remain the same. Esmail’s additions only serve to further our understanding of his major ideas. Those ideas are deeply embedded in the show.

Mr. Robot addresses themes, including isolation, corruption, and control.

“Control is an illusion”, says Mr. Robot.

As in the first season, Esmail capitalizes on his ability to confuse and disturb viewers. He uses dark images and intense confrontations to evoke unsettling emotions.

The whole episode is about control. There is a constant tug of war. Power is not stagnant. It is taken and given.

In the show’s previous season audiences learn to not immediately perceive things as they seem. There were major twists. Each character and each event contained various layers.

Mr. Robot–Elliot’s father and delusion–was revealed to be a conception of Elliot’s imagination by the end of the first season. He comes back relatively strong in this season’s first episode.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a character interact with someone who isn’t real quite the way Elliot does with Mr. Robot. At multiple points in the episode Elliot and Mr. Robot have intense feuds with each other, which almost always result in a scramble of violent emotion.

As the episode goes on, Elliot’s delusions seem to be more and more real and manipulative of his actions.

The constant delusions serve to suggest the reality of Elliot’s mania. From the first episode, Elliot seems to be far more damaged than he appears in the first season. All of his trauma, both physical and mental, have burrowed deep into his thoughts and rests in his mind.

All of his actions are manipulated by his thoughts. And his thoughts are toxic.

He only has two significant connections to reality that guide his way. Both exist inside his mind granting him no growth and no escape. He lacks control almost entirely–or does he?

There are questions that remain. Some may or may not be answered. Either way, you’ll have to watch this and the coming episodes (which air every Wednesday) to find out.

Filed Under: Commentary and reviews, Culture and Entertainment

Technology Good or Bad?

August 4, 2016 by a.diaz4 Leave a Comment

Technology seems to have a lot of influence on the 21 century. The influences that technology is both positive and negative but I think there are more negative influences when using technology than positive.

Technologies positive influence on society is to make finding information easier for people. Before technology, people would have to search a lot of books to find what they needed and that would sometimes take days,weeks and/or months. Now while using technology in the modern era (21st century),technology is at our fingertips which helps to find multiple things quicker. Also technology  can give us new ways to communicate with distant family members and friends.

When doing a survey to see if technology has a more positive influence/impact on us I found that more people said that technology does have a more impact on us then a negative impact. The people said that technology has a more positive influence/impact on us because it can make us more smarter and mindful of things around us. To add-on people who took the survey also say that it’s good for communicating with distant relatives and such.

Technologies negative influence on society is that its making people lazy. With technology nobody wants to get up and go do anything because they feel as if their life is on their electronic equipment. Also with technology people don’t  have good communication skills because in this era we communicate by texting using abbreviations rather than actually spelling the word out. We also communicate while using technology we use emojis rather than actually expressing ourselves and showing our true emotions and how we really feel. Nobody looks in the dictionary anymore they look on the internet and they don’t go outside because technology is constantly at their fingertips so they feel they don’t need to go outside.

When doing the  survey I found that the people who did say that technology has a negative influence on us they mainly said that because it makes us more blinded to the real world because we live on our phones. To add-on the people who were taking the survey said that technology has a negative influence on us because it can cause harm to us. Technology can cause harm to us because when we are on our electronic devices we become unaware of our surroundings and what we are getting ourselves into when we are on the internet.

       I believe technology has a bad influence on because we can do things that aren’t necessarily good. With technology being so popular in this century we are losing values and things that are important such as actually having a conversation,making friends, and learning to express feelings that can’t be expressed through a phone  because technology is overriding and overpowering everything.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Girls Violating Dress Code But What About Boys?

August 4, 2016 by Aleida Menchaca Leave a Comment

A girl wears a spaghetti strap shirt to school.What happens to the girl? She is sent home to change or cover up or gets detention. However, a boy wears a  provocative shirt to school. What happens to the boy?

It seems that schools are focus on girls only breaking the dress codes. But schools seems to be forgetting that the boys as well are breaking the dress codes at schools. They walk around with their pants sagging or maybe wearing  provocative shirts that have a female’s body naked. Why is it that boys aren’t told anything or don’t have consequences like the girls do when they break the dress codes?   

“I’ve never seen a boy called out for his attire even though they also break the rules,” stated Maggie Sunseri in The Sexism Of School Dress Code written by Li Zhou. Girls notice that boys are not being told or are not getting punished when they break the dress codes. This makes it unfair because it seems like girls are being discriminated against.

“It is unfair and I personally feel constantly being bothered and I have seen other girls bothered as well. If we aren’t harming anyone there shouldn’t be a problem. They should make guys wear belts though, that is uncomfortable to see,” said Karina Pena, a current student at University Neighborhood High School. Several times throughout her school year she was told to cover up and threatened with phone calls home just because you were able to see her belly button.

A few boys also think girls are being discriminated against. “I think it’s messed up. Girls are told that they can’t show too much skin or specific clothing like a bra strap without getting sent home to change or asked to wear a sweater. Yet boys can wear t-shirts with sometimes provocative or suggestive images on them with little notice or sometimes none at all,” says Roy Rivera, a rising senior at University Neighborhood High School. Not many boys can agree that it’s fair girls are the only ones targeting for breaking dress codes.

Does it give boys an advantage to wear anything they want?

Yes it does give boys an advantage. They won’t be told anything or be punished for breaking the dress codes. Schools seem to be allowing the boys to walk the halls freely with pants sagging and provocative t-shirts. Roy is not only thinking about the unfairness of not targeting boys as well, but also about the way teachers are holding back girls from their education.“You’re taking away time from this girl’s education. It’s more important for this girl to wear a sweater or go home and change than it is for her to learn the curriculum.”

Boys are wearing provocative shirts to school, with suggestive images on them such as drugs or drug dealers like Pablo Escobar. What are boys told? Maybe the possible answer “Hey, could you maybe try not to wear that to school? We wouldn’t want people getting the wrong idea.”

What’s the typical response from an adult?

“Boys will be boys.” Why is it school is letting boys be boys? Why aren’t boys targeted at when they break the dress code? It’s okay for boys to be boys when they take off their shirt when playing basketball at school. But it’s not okay for girl to show too much back or show a bit of cleavage at prom. And if she does she is told to change, cover up or in some cases gets removed from school activities or even suspended. How is that okay?  When boys are clearly violating a dress code standard, they need to face the consequences girls face when they break the dress code. It’s unfair for girls to be the only ones targeted for breaking dress codes in school.

Filed Under: Commentary, Lifestyles

Punishment or Death: Reform or Regret

August 4, 2016 by MATTHEW ENG Leave a Comment

Just listen to the word “Death Penalty.” Now, say it to yourself again. The term sounds daunting, correct?

Well, it gets worse when accused individuals are put to death and were later found to be innocent of the crime.  What do we do then?  We literally took an innocent person’s life.

Bob Herbert wrote an opinion piece in The New York Times “Convicted, Executed, Not Guilty,” which illustrated the idea of wrongfully convicted defendants being executed and later found innocent.  Mr. Herbert mainly focused on the Larry Griffin case.  In 1980, Mr. Griffin was convicted for a drive by shooting, of a drug dealer.  During the trial, the prosecution presented eyewitness testimony from Mr. Griffin’s cellmate, and later provided physical evidence that linked Mr. Griffin to the crime. On the other hand, the defense team refuted the prosecution’s evidence and presented three suspects who were responsible for the crime and physical evidence that proved Mr. Griffin’s innocence. Despite the defense’s convincing presentation, Mr. Griffin was convicted of the crime and was sentenced to capital punishment for arsenal and murder. Decades later, an investigation in to Mr. Griffin’s case, found that Mr. Griffin was wrongfully convicted for the crime, because of erroneous forensic evidence. The most important fact is that we cannot give Mr. Griffin his normal life back, because he already was immorally executed.

Throughout the years, a prominent adversary of death penalty, The Innocence Project, has kept reports about wrongfully convicted people being executed. Recent years, those investigations exemplify that many criminal convictions were wrong and state courts took innocent men and women’s lives.  Here is one of their stories.

It was December 1991 in Corsicana, Texas when a rumbling fire destroyed Cameron Todd Willingham’s home killing his three daughters.  Mr. Willingham claimed he was asleep during the fire. However, prosecutors provided forensic evidence and eyewitness testimony pointed to Mr. Willingham. In addition to the forensic evidence, the prosecution provided a jealous motive; several eyewitness testimonies and that implicated Mr. Willingham. Mr. Willingham was executed in 2004.  However, recent investigations concluded that forensic evidence may have erroneous in linking Mr. Willingham of the crime, but guess what, Todd Willingham is another example case of wrongfully executed and therefore cannot be exonerated.

The Death Penalty Information Center has been tracking people wrongfully convicted in death penalty cases throughout the nation. Florida has the most exonerated people out of all 26 states that used the death penalty in 2015.  Florida has 26 released wrongfully convicted individuals; Illinois followed with 20 and then Texas with 13.  In total, there were 156 exonerations throughout the 26 states for the past years.

Clearly this is a problem.  How can state and government officials and prosecutors sleep at night while they are responsible for these statistics?  It is also ironic because one of our main country’s main objective legal systems is to prevent crime and maintain law and order in our communities and states, and capital punishment is a crime when we “accidently” take someone’s life.  Instead of states using the death penalty, they should consider other reversible punishments such as life imprisonment without any chance of probation. Although is a costly option, but in the long run, we can save an innocent people from wrongful death. Meanwhile, killing is wrong and immoral. No one should have the right to take another life.  There will be no room for reform or regret.

Filed Under: Commentary, News

Natural Black Hair: Unprofessional in a Work Environment?

August 4, 2016 by d.holmes1 Leave a Comment

“It is a subtle instance of privilege; other women can go to work without worry, black women have to be ready to defend their natural hair in the workplace at a moment’s notice.”

                                                                                   –Elle (arthur from blackgirllonghair.com)

African American women, from a young age have been told that their hair isn’t “good.” There has always been a European standard that has oppressed the black women. There is pressure on them to have their hair straight and their skin light, even though that is fully out of their natural-born control. African American women for decades have permed their hair with toxic chemicals to make it as straight as possible.

 Now many are embracing natural styles, but not everyone is ready to jump on this hair movement train. People are denying African American women who wear these styles jobs, firing them, and telling them flat out that they cannot wear their hair natural because it is deemed to be “unprofessional”.

One may ask, how can someone’s natural hair, that grows out of their own head, be “unprofessional”? Why should afros and cornrows be considered “ungroomed”? White corporate America still has oppressive ways. Executives want to hire those only who look like them and fit a certain brand. If your hair isn’t as flat as theirs, you don’t meet the standard.

Back in 2001, Hampton University, a historically Black university, banned cornrows and dreadlocks within the classroom. But the dean insisted it was to help students land corporate jobs. And this is sad. At a place where African American students are supposed to be embracing their blackness and loving everything black about themselves, still instilled in them that they have to conform to European standards in order to make a living.

While natural hair styles are evolving, so is the cultural appropriation. Black women are being shamed for their cornrows, but when a white woman chooses to wear cornrows, it is “cool” and “urban”. Young African American actress, Zendaya was ridiculed for wearing faux locs on the red carpet by Giuliana Rancic, who said Zendaya’s hair probably smells like patchouli oil and weed (I’m guessing a Bob Marley reference, but that wasn’t funny). However, Giuliana also said that Kylie Jenner’s, who is white, faux dreads as “edgy”.

The bottom line is, that it is 2016, and African American women should no longer be ashamed of who they are. They shouldn’t feel it’s necessary to “control” their hair. They should be able to wear their hair whichever way they please.

Filed Under: Culture and Entertainment, Lifestyles

The Good, The Bad, and The Rotten Tomato

August 4, 2016 by GWENDOLYN LEE Leave a Comment

“I pretty much see movies all day,” Rafer Guzman told Baruch College Now’s journalism students at the end of July at the Vertical Campus.

To many kids and young adults, watching movies all day for a living sounds fun. But to professional movie critic Rafer Guzman, it can get “frustrating at a certain point, because sometimes, there’s just nothing to say– but you have to say something.”

“You have to see absolutely everything, even if you don’t like it,” Guzman explained.

But Guzman doesn’t mind seeing terrible movies because he believes that “you always learn about what makes movies good or bad.” Many reviews by Guzman will include what he thought the director did well, or which scenes worked or failed.

It wasn’t until after Guzman graduated when he started to critique movies.

“I had no idea what I was doing with my life at all… There was no grand plan from the very start,” he said.

All Guzman knew was that he liked movies and music, that he watched a lot of movies, and that he listened to a lot of music.

Guzman told the students that he started writing freelance movie reviews at 26 and sold them to companies willing to publish his reviews.

Since then, Guzman has published over 900 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, which have appeared in publications such as the Boston Phoenix, the Los Angeles Times, and Newsday.   

Filed Under: Culture and Entertainment, Mahattan, News

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Archives

  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • August 2019
  • August 2018
  • August 2017
  • December 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2009
  • July 2009

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in