When I read the reviews of Hamilton, I still don’t see how it is a game-changer. The review from Rooney says that Hamilton is original, but what even counts as original anymore? The same article even says other works have done the same things before, just not with as much success. That doesn’t make Hamilton “original.” It just makes it “good.” Is the “game-changer” the one that first pioneers a concept or is it the one that is first to obtain success?