The Pursuit of Happyness portrays prejudice and racism
The author of this post argues that the movie exemplifies the hegemonic practises of racism and prejudice in our society. She sees racism in this movie’s context on a micro scale, by the actions taken by groups and individuals, while prejudice is seen on a macro scale, such that assumptions are made based on historical beliefs and stereotypes towards another group.
The example the author used to support her claims about racism is when the main character, Chris Gardner, a black man is always the one being asked to do favors around the office. He is the only one who is asked to get his superior coffee everyday, even though that is not part of his job description, and his needs are put below his superior, Mr. Frakesh’s needs when they both had important meetings. Even though Chris made it clear to Mr. Frakesh that he has probably one of the most important client meetings, Mr. Frakesh dismisses this and is adamant that Chris help him move his car.
On prejudice, the author uses a quote from the movie to explain. Chris is naturally gifted in logic and numbers. However, his employer, Jay Twistle is having trouble solving a Rubik’s cube. When Chris says “I’m pretty sure I can [solve the cube],” Jay immediately shuts him down, saying “No you can’t,” without giving him a chance, or knowing what he is capable of. The author argues that this is because Whites are historically seen as superior in terms of intelligence, while Blacks are seen as physically superior, such as in sports and hard labor (slavery). These are stereotypes believed perhaps by Jay, a rich white man.
This rhetorical analysis of the movie is interesting, because I have never though to look at this topic on a micro and macro scale. To me, I have always grouped racism and prejudice together because they go hand in hand. Thinking back, I can’t exactly categorize Mr. Frakesh’s actions as entirely racist, even though there are discriminatory undertones to his actions. Why does he only make Chris do his chores, when there are other people in the office? Chris is the only black person. Before Chris, did he make anybody else do his errands? Possibly, and the person he chose could have been white. With Jay, I can see where the author is coming from, given the historical context and beliefs, however looking through Jay’s perspective, if a random stranger told you that they can do something you’ve been trying days to solve, I’d be pretty hesitant too. Perhaps it was his choice of words “NO, you CAN’T,” that made the connection that no, your intellectually inferior race can’t solve something that the successful white man can’t do.
Given the theme of the movie and some of the arguments made above, I’d use these pieces of information to argue that race and prejudice is actually an obstacle to those on the pursuit of happiness, that even though it is a constitutional right, the access to this pursuit is not the same for everyone.