Paula Scher

Juan Romero
ART 4900
Professor Klein

Paula Scher has been at the forefront of graphic design for four decades. She has worked on everything from album and magazine covers to corporate and brand identities. She has also taught classes and written books on graphic design and has won countless awards, including a 2001 AIGA Medal. It is an illustrious career that continues to this day. During her time as a graphic designer, Paula has approached her work with the populist viewpoint meaning her designs would mix in popular culture as a way to draw in people. She does not have a specific style though. Her work has ranged from extremely clean-cut to very in your face designs, all depending on what it’s for.

Some of her most famous designs were the designs she made for The Public Theater’s production of Bring in ‘da Noise, Bring in ‘da Funk. This particular design incorporates the musical’s main actor surrounded by blocks of words. All the words are going in various directions to mimic motion, which is meant to represent the dancing from the production. The title of the production, along with the names of other productions at The Public Theater, are presented in a large, bold san serif font. The name of the authors of the productions, and other information, is presented in a very small, red san serif font. All of this is presented against a yellow background, thus making everything on the poster stand out.

This second Paula Scher design is one of her most recognizable. Designed back in 1976, this design has stood the test of time. The design incorporates bright colors over a black backdrop. She used guitars and made them look like spaceships (something I had never noticed until just now) and created contrast between the different elements of the design by using bright reds and blues. She also displays Boston, both the band’s and the album’s name, in a bright yellow stylized font on the center of the top of the cover. At the time, album covers mostly featured a picture of the band so this was a good change of pace and add some mystic to who could be behind the album. Though Scher believes the design to be “mediocre”, it is one of the most iconic album covers ever created.

Ultimately, Paula Scher has done and continues to do a great job of embodying and representing her subjects in her work. She continues to create identities the stand the test of time.

Nan Goldin Ballad of Sexual Dependency

Wendy Zhang

Art 4900

96e3bc575426560ad2600a78c09d8ac4

I think the exhibition of Nan Goldin The Ballad of Sexual Dependency is very interesting. It basically is a slideshow of Nan Goldin’s photographs, which contain a lot of sex, drugs and love. In my opinion, she expressed the emotions very well, not only in each individual photo but also as a whole composition.

I took a very quick look of the photographs that displayed outside and headed right into the theater to watch the whole documentation. I think it is very remarkable that she separated the photos by gender, sexual preferences, age and also the stories happened behind the photos.

The most impressive part to me is the beginning, the section of girls looking into mirror, staying rooms alone, and enjoying the bath time. I felt connected as a girl who has been through this stage of my life, feeling lost and confused during the high school period, finding out the beauty of my body as a grown up girl, and also wondering about the love. I was extremely attracted by the bodies of the young ladies in Nan Goldin’s pictures, such as the brightening skins and also the prefect curves shape. It’s the natural beauty that no one could take away but time, and Nan Goldin recorded them forever in the photos.

On the other hand, I think different people looking into the same photo would have variety understanding of the stories. Some stories are very well told by looking at the first sight. For example, I remember of one photo that a couples are siting at somewhere like a bar since the background is very dark. They are smiling to the camera but the audiences can clearly see the reflection of the tears insides the girls eye also a little bit in the boys. I started to wondering maybe they are talking about future, or being separate from each other, or could be they just made peace from the fight. Freezing the stories into one simple picture, I think that is how Nan Goldin made the whole The Ballad of Sexual Dependency fascinating.

Bill Brandt Photographer Essay – Jonathan Huang

Bill Brandt also known as Hermann Wilhelm Brandt was born on May 2nd, 1904 and passed away on  December  20, 1983. He was a British photographer as well as a photojournalist. He was orignally born in German but later moved to England, where he received recognition for his images of the British society under the magazine brands such as Lilliput and Picture Post, and eventually leading to his distorted nudes, along with portraits of famous artists and landscapes. He is famously portrayed to be at the top of the list of important British photographers in the 20th century.

http://www.billbrandt.com/bill-brandt-archive-print-shop/sp04-grand-union-canal-paddington-c1938

One of this pieces was the “Grand Union Canal, Paddington c1938” which shows a waterway, that was engineered by William Jessop and James Barnes, it established a link of London, via Brentford and the Thames, with the canals of the Midlands. This piece is actually quite beautiful of a black and white photograph which has a sense of repetition and perfect flow of the water and buildings creating a sense of depth of perspective. Its really composed shot.

Man Ray by Theron Charles

Man Ray (1890–1976) was a innovator of the Dada crusade in the United States and France and a vital leading role of Surrealism. Man Ray found motivation at the Armory show of 1913, which introduced the works of Pablo Picasso, Wassily Kandinsky and Marcel Duchamp. Ray moved to Paris in 1921. He became to be well-known for his photographs of his creative and literary allies. He also established a flourishing career as a fashion photojournalist, by taking pictures for such publications as Vogue. His testing with photography comprised of experiencing how to create “camera-less” pictures, which he named Rayographs. These photographs were prepared by employing and influencing objects on pieces of photosensitive paper.

Ray’s prominent works from the 1924’s “Le Violon d’Ingres.”

Man Ray remained a fan of the portraits of Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres and completed a successions of pictures, motivated by Ingres’s languorous nudes, of the model Kiki in a turban. Placing the f-holes of a stringed instrument on the photographic print and then re-photographing the print, Man Ray transformed what was initially a standard nude. He also decided to add the name Le Violon d’Ingres, a French idiom that means “hobby.” The alteration of Kiki’s physique into a harmonious instrument with the simple accumulation of a little brushstrokes makes this a hilarious image, but then again her armless form is also alarming to consider. The photograph upholds a tautness among objectification and appreciation of the female body. I would interpret the photo as the women body can be great as to listening to music.

Arbitrating after Ray’s presence of this image in other photographic arrangements, he required to have considered Tears one of his most triumphant photographs. A cropped version of it with a single eye also appears as the first plate in a 1934 book of his photographs. The woman’s lamenting rising glimpse and mascara-encrusted lashes seem envisioned to raise curiosity at the source of her suffering. The face, however, belongs not to a actual female but to a fashion mannequin who cries tears of sparkling, rotund glass drops; the result is to aestheticize the feeling her tears would usually express. Man Ray finished this photograph in Paris about the time of his collapsing with his partner Lee Miller, and the woman’s false tears may narrate to that occasion in the artist’s life.

Paul Voler Photographer Essay

Edward Steichen was a prolific photographer and painter born in Luxembourg. Steichen moved to the United States in the late 1800’s and was originally trained as a lithographer and painter, but was introduced to photography and purchased his first camera in 1985. As photography as beginning to become an accepted art form, Steichen was able to capture widely regarded images the shaped the form of artistic expression through photo for many years to come.

On his way to a trip to Paris in 1900, Steichen stopped in New York City to the Camera Club to visit Alfred Steiglitz, who was one of the most respected tastemakers in making modern photography an accepted form of art. Steiglitz was instantly fond of Steichen’s work and actually bought 3 photographs in the first meeting. Steiglitz was the editor of Camera Notes and his fondest of Steichen would later turn into an incredible partnership.

Upon arriving to Paris, Steichen completely ditched painting and began to seriously focus on his photography as his main art form. Upon his return in 1902 he opened a gallery in New York and formally launched his career as a tastemaker and professional photographer. He worked with again with Steglitz on a new and more lavish photography journal called Camera Works. In all 15 issues Steichen was the most featured photographer. Steichen and Steiglitz formed an amazing partnership that would eventually turn into a gallery that would exhibit their most favorite works of photography avant-grade art, know to many as “291”. Steichen stapled his place in the art world and quickly became one of the most regarded and widely known photographers in the world.

In 1923, Steichen was offered one of the most prestigious positions in photography, chief photographer of Conde Nast publications Vogue and Vanity Fair. Steichen took full advantage of the position and began what would be later recognized as modern fashion photography for prolific brands such as Chanel and Lanvin. Steichen created detailed and crisp photographs of gowns and women’s wear that changed the course of how fashion was displayed and influenced scores of modern photographers to come.

I studied a slideshow of portraits that Steichen shot during his time at Vanity Fair from 1923-1937. I was obviously infatuated with some of the celebrities that he shot during the time, such as, Walt Disney, Ameila Earhart, Gary Cooper, Fred Astaire, Charlie Chapin. Steichen was lucky enough to work during a time and for a publication that enabled him to catch truly breath taking photographs. Two of my favorite photos were of Winston Churchill shot in April 1932 and a photo of Gloria Swanson from 1928. The photo of Swanson is astonishing to me. I love the vision of the lace and the full frame headshot behind it. Swanson had the most amazing, huge beautiful eyes. Swanson would have looked amazing without manipulation, but to me the vision of the photographer shines bright in the portrait It looks like the lace is placed over the photo, but to me it makes such a beautiful effect with a contrast of detail that makes the photo so interesting. The portrait of Churchill strikes me because of the intense look on his face and backdrop chosen. I love the way this photo looks, it makes me want to shoot an executive portrait in the same way. Steichen captured the tense and serious nature of Churchill 8 years before he became prime minister of the UK. I believe that it is the depth and the dark nature of the photo that grants it such a large impact for the person viewing. I never knew much about Winston Churchill, but I did know that he was a very serious man and I feel that this photo catches that exact essence.

Looking through a series of photos it is obvious the impact on photography Steichen was able to capture. I looked through 14 years of some of his best photos and it was such a difficult job to choose between a few favorites. He had an obvious style for each, but it was not really consistent. Steichen captured the essence of personality of his subjects and I feel is one of the most important parts of his photographs. It is about essence and he captured it beautifully, each time with the viewer able to make an artistic revelation in viewing the month’s issue.

Steichen created works of great imagination as well as great risk. The way he shot fashion was never shot before. He brought life and movement into fashion photography that was not previously done before. He showed the life of a piece of clothing to spectators that only understood it head on. He brought more natural tone and playful attitude to the covers of Vanity Fair and probably shaped the dreams of many young designers aspiring for their creations to grace the covers so eloquently one day. Steichen was certainly ahead of his time in the way that he shot and it is clear to see how he became such a prolific and celebrated artist as the field of photography was just evolving. In fact it is easy to say that the work that Steichen contributed played a huge role in evolving modern photography as an art form.

Elliott Erwitt

Sowon Jung

Elliott Erwitt was born in 1928 in the beautiful city of France, Paris. When he was ten in 1939, his family originally from Russia shifted to the United States. There, from the New School for Social Sciences and Los Angeles City College, Erwitt learned photography and filmmaking until 1950. During the same decade, Erwitt worked as an assistant photographer.Erwitt was hired by Stryker who used to be the Director of the department of photography at Farm Security Administration, to do a project for Standard Oil Company. Once done, Erwitt started a freelance career in photography and worked for Life, Look, Holiday, and Coiller’s. In 1953, Elliott Erwitt joined Magnum Photos and this gave him a chance to do international projects.

Screen Shot 2016-07-28 at 2.16.51 PM

Elliott Erwitt, Santa Monica, California (1955)

This is one of well-known photographs among Elliott Erwitt’s famous works. According to Elliott Erwitt’s biography, he describes taking photos as “just composing all the parts in a rectangle” I personally think that this photo is very harmonious that shows strong impact by playing composition within the rectangle frame. As you can see, the objects in this photo is not special and unique at all, but somehow it is so beautiful because the photographer tried to find something interesting in the ordinary. Putting the object (the couple) in the lower side of rectangle is well composed and the blurry images of background also helps to focus well. Moreover, this photo is so impressive because audiences can feel the same emotion through the woman’s smile which implies what the photographer might want to say.  The photographer might want to share his thought that life is not always special as everyone expects but, life can be happy in our ordinary daily moments.

Liu-Andre Kertesz

Holding a small camera and shooting photos on streets, Andre Kertesz is considered one of “the seminal figures of photojournalism” (Wiki). Kertesz was born in Hungary in 1894 (died in 1985). He got his first camera when he was 18. After finishing his Hungarian period of life, he immigrated to French in 1925. Since that, Kertesz started to shine on the world stage. Even though his life got a low point when he moved to the United Sates, he published a book named “Sixty Years of Photography, 1912-1972.” Kertesz’s special photograph style also strongly influents Henri Cartier-Bresson, the master of candid photography.

The first photograph of Kertesz is “The Circus.” It was shoot in 1920. At that time, Kertesz was still at Hungary and he liked to photograph the Hungarian peasants around him. Here we can see, there is a couple peeking at concealed circus performers through cracks in a wooden fence, and the man appears to have only one leg. This is Kertesz’s early work and it’s easy to see his clarity of style. This couple is centered and all the fence is geometric patterning in this photo. As Kertesz recorded, “I photographed real life-not the way it was, but the way I felt it. This is the most important thing: not analyzing, but feeling” (Blog). Here we can see, Kertesz was trying to make connection between his emotion and his subjects by using his special geometric photograph style. For me, I think the angel of shooting photos can arouse audience’s curiosity about what this couple is peeking there.

Screen Shot 2016-07-28 at 2.14.36 PM The Circus, Budapest, 1920

Another photography of Kertesz is “The Lost Cloud” which was shoot in New York. As described, “One afternoon he observed a solitary white cloud lost in a huge blue sky, dwarfed by the monolithic presence of the Rockefeller Center” (Getty). Kertesz said this cloud represented himself. Here we can directly feel his emotion through looking at this photography. Kertesz endowed this cloud with a personal, emotional dimension. That exactly conformed to Kertesz’s photography style. The white space conflicts to the geometric building shape, which gives audience a feeling of Kertesz himself. In my opinion, this photo is fresh and vivid while it represents Kertesz’s real life situation. I think no matter what kind of photography skills we focus on, as long as we shoot objects by our hearts and feel them, we will experience the quintessential spirit of Andre Kertesz.

Screen Shot 2016-07-28 at 2.14.52 PM The Lost Cloud, New York, 1937