A Few Things

I particularly enjoyed reading The Adventure’s of Tom Sawyer however I found some things to be interesting.

I recall from class how there was somewhat of a consensus about how Alice talking out loud to herself at various moments was, for lack of a better word, strange. I am therefore curious about how the few beginning scenes would be reconciled. Between page four and five Aunt Polly speaks a large paragraph out loud to no one but the reader and herself. To me it appears to be a sort of filler/introduction as to the nature of Tom Sawyer. This also happens after Tom is caught by his Aunt Polly and as he’s running away he speaks about how she always switches the color of the stitching on the collar.

I also think it’s really important to mention the words being used here. The slang used by the characters speaking such as: nuff’, lick you, singed cat, pumped on our heads… and many more examples. These can be compared to the language of the narrator which at times is simple but also contains what appears to me to be extravagant words for children such as: ambuscade, adamantine reposeful, ponderously, daintily… and many more examples. This brings me back to the beginning of the year when we had to read that text about an intended reader for specific works. If the group of people in the authors group had deemed the poem they’d read inappropriate for children since it had contained two made up words, how would parents reconcile this novel? These days the slang would not be well known, personally I had to do a google search to understand some of the things that were being said, and the large words I can only assume not all children would know without asking or looking them up. I also think that this combination of words make an interesting comparison. Through comparing both slang and high profile words we get somewhat of a muddling between understanding these characters and attempting to relate to them while being fed differently worded descriptions [perhaps coming from an elite of people not used to the slang].

Another thing, all the talk about curiosity in Alice also got to me as I was reading about Tom Sawyer and his “adventurous, troublesome ways,” [5]. Is being adventurous or curious ever considered a good quality for children or is it solely bad leading to mischief and connoting of something absolutely negative?

The last thing I really wanted to bring up was the paragraph on pages nineteen and twenty. Not because I really wanted to discuss it more so I thought that it was a really cool statement by Twain and an amazing example of what I believe to be satire. It shows the master of satire doing what he does best. 

Letters and Words

I found the anti slavery alphabet to be extremely interesting. Clearly it was meant to convince children of the time to be against slavery and the fact that it is written as a poem appears to make it easier to memorize and recite to others. If you are looking for an air of whimsy in this alphabet however, you shall find none. It is presented in a somewhat grim manner for children as seen in many instances: the mother in the jail, the whipping post… Though arguably there are a few letters that are less intense than others there is still this strange sense of grimness. This does actually make the alphabet a success. It’s easy to memorize, seems engaging to read, and communicates the abolitionist message in an easy way. I found two other things that were somewhat curious however.

Number one was the depiction of the letters. What I mean is why did the letters have to have those diamonds with those circles in the middle of them. Why couldn’t they have just been printed as colored letters without any symbols in the middle? I guess one can say that they are just meant to be designs to keep children’s interest but personally I actually found the symbols to be very similar to a clock. The diamonds are the two hands and the circle in the middle is the gear. Now as to what that would mean I have no idea but that was just the way I saw it…

Number two was the letter x. One can guess that X is hard to find a word for, however I’m not exactly certain what Xerxes has to do with anything. I had to look up who he was on the internet and I found that he had been the king of Persia in biblical times. This would explain the use of his name if we’re accepting the assumption that all/most children were raised religiously and would recognize Xerxes as the former king of Persia. I also actually found a website that discussed the letter x in 19th century alphabets (although the anti slavery alphabet wasn’t included in the list), It’s pretty cool as well if anyone is interested.

http://kandelsmith.com/2013/11/07/letter-x/