Finding Evidence
The article explains that the types of evidence used in certain situations can vary because some may convince the audience in certain circumstances and some may not. Evidence is used with the ultimate goal of supporting your argument and convincing your audience. Evidence should match the time and place of your claim thus, the pieces of evidence can vary. The article raises the point that every situation that evidence supports, meaning the argument, can be thought of as a rhetorical situation. I think this is a good point which I never thought of before because every argument poses an idea that can be inputted into society or put into practice thus being a rhetorical situation. There are also many pieces of evidence that are data-related because statistics are fact that cannot necessarily be proven wrong unless there were non-credible sources. The article stresses the point that the same evidence may not always be useful in different fields or situations. It also informs the reader that there are many resources available in libraries and databases which would make them credible. I think this article informs you very well on the different types of sources that can be used to get evidence for your argument and it clearly explains that you have to know the contexts of the evidence and how it matches the time and place of the situation.
Under My Thumb
The writer starts the essay with dialogue of her own experience with altering her truth in order to feel equal in return. I think this tactic really draws in the reader and has them thinking of so many questions. She clarifies at the end of the dialogue of what she means by the whole example and how it relates to her paper. The paper explains that women in music are overlooked and have to work harder for their credibility than men and even in the writers syllabi there is a low number of women musicians compared to men. The writer presents claims of the argument she is against and afterwards she rejects them with her own supporting details. She also supports her claim using sources from authors who wrote books about the female musicians she is talking about like Spiegal. When reading the writers graphic example of how she was sexually harassed at the concert, my reaction was of disgust and astonishment as I would have had a worse reaction in the situation than she did. Her point was further explained in the paragraph that followed in which she talks about how women are unsafe at crowded concerts. The last paragraph of her paper is very eye-opening as she blames herself and opens up about her self-realization about the issue and her involvement in it. I think the use of her experiences as examples made the paper more interesting while she made her point with regular pieces of evidence as well.