Manifestos aim to promote a certain policy or goal to an individual, group, or society. Sometimes the most effective strategy used to achieve that goal is through the utilization of radical language. Radical language captures the intense emotions of the author and conveys this sentiment to the audience. It also enthralls the reader and could potentially create a large following. When used correctly, radical language could enhance your message, but if used recklessly, it might harm your reputation. Both the Black Panther Party and SCUM Manifesto had a different approach of using radical language as a revolt against societal norms.

The Black Panther Party effectively used radical language to support the Civil Rights Movement. This unique writing style of “We Want, we believe” summarized the main issues that affected the black community and offered possible solutions to these issues. For example, one of their issues was their lack of freedom and one possible solution they offered was to become leaders of their own communities (Black Panther Party 1). Another issue was fair trials for black suspects and the proposed solution was granting them juries of their peers, attorneys of their choice and freedom from imprisonment while awaiting trial (Black Panther Party 2). Notice that this style of writing was considered radical because it denounced the social norm that was segregation by offering various propositions.

On the other hand, SCUM Manifesto didn’t effective use radical language to support the feminist movement. Valerie Solana’s ostracizing of the entire male population by using demonizing adjective works in direct opposition to feminism. She says, “The male is completely egocentric, trapped inside himself, incapable of empathizing or identifying with others, or love, friendship, affection or tenderness” (Solana 1). This will make many men hate feminism and thus shun away a large group of potential supports.

Benny Chan