Monthly Archives: May 2016

Rankine on Rich

Claudia Rankine (author of Citizen) recently wrote about the work of Adrienne Rich in the New Yorker:

http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/adrienne-richs-poetic-transformations

An excerpt:

In answer to the question “Does poetry play a role in social change?,” Adrienne Rich once answered:

Yes, where poetry is liberative language, connecting the fragments within us, connecting us to others like and unlike ourselves, replenishing our desire. . . . In poetry words can say more than they mean and mean more than they say. In a time of frontal assaults both on language and on human solidarity, poetry can remind us of all we are in danger of losing—disturb us, embolden us out of resignation.

Latino culture vs American culture

Children of Latino descent that are born in America are subject to many different social pressures. The main reason for this is that they have a hard time distinguishing what culture to identify more with, their Latino side or their American side. Due to this confusion, most Latino children have a rougher time dealing with social pressures such as peer pressure, family expectations, drugs, sex, alcohol and popularity. Junot Diaz, a Dominican author presents these pressures of Latino adolescent growth in a unique way through the novel Drown.

Doing research on the biography of Diaz, he was born in Villa Juana a barrio in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. His father abandoned his family in the mid 1980’s. Diaz also immigrated from DR to Parlin NJ, and he writes in his novel about how the conflicts between American culture and Dominican culture stem deeper into family expectations. The father is expected to provide for the family, but when Yunior’s family move to America, they find out that Yunior’s father started a new family. The family also expected Yunior to take as many opportunities as he possibly could, but Yunior falls into temptations by being a troublemaker. Diaz sets the tone of this story vividly by showing the readers false, glittered impression that Dominican families have about the American dream. Yunior’s family expected everything to unfold according to their hopes and succeed, but their dreams have been abruptly disturbed as soon as the family contacted unfamiliar territory.

The theme of peer pressure presents itself within the actions of Yunior when Diaz describes in the story how Yunior and Beto steal, break windows, piss on people’s steps and challenge them to come and stop them. Diaz is suggesting here with Yunior’s decisions that Yunior cares more about trying to assimilate with the American culture and gaining acceptance of his friends rather than keeping the family’s values of studying and doing well in school. By showing us Yunior’s bad decisions and behaviors, readers can understand that many Dominican immigrants fall victim to this type of lifestyle where the immigrants subconsciously seek to gain recognition and approval.

Kids that need to grow up. Don’t be confused.

Junot Díaz a spanish writer, writes a story about 2 friends. They were really good friends but because of one incident, it separated them. The reason for the separation of their friendship was because, one of them named Beto was a “faggot”. In this story, Junot Díaz writes using many expressional words. The writer uses any descriptive words that show the readers many expressions at once. These words that the writers choose to use brings up a very strong feeling to the readers. He uses phrases such as ” her finger soothing the creases” which makes you think what are those creases, why are they relevant? All she did, the mother, was take some money from him. So how did that sooth the creases?

Junot Díaz  used alot of representation language in his works. Many of his time he spent with his mother shows that he is the man of the house now, and that he is the father. As he goes with his mother to the shopping mall, giving her about fifty dollars, it reminds him that his father used to give that to his mother. Realizing that, he knew it represented now that he was only partial of the man of the house his father was but he still had to make decisions.

At the time of the incident, while watching porn with his best friend, Beto. Beto reached into his shorts, and complained saying “What the fuck are you doing? This represented that he knew what was right and wrong but he didn’t stop him because he said Beto was his best friend. He knew all of this was wrong and he did all of the actions that represented that he knew it was wrong. He didn’t show up to the mall or anywhere else that he always goes to for fun, hid in the basement, and even rejected his mother’s cries to help him. He knew it was abnormal and didn’t want to end up as a “fucking pato”. All of these actions represented that he knew of these right and wrong.

At the end of the story, she spoke of the windows ” You better check those windows, she says”, I believe this part meant much of a greater deal. Throughout the story, he was constantly reminded of his past with his friend, Beto, before he was a “faggot” and before the incident. His thoughts lingered in his head about how much fun they had together as children but he knew that his friend was wrong. He knew there was different types of love, as a friend love and as a partner love; His friend Beto could not have differentiate that. His mother saying “You better check those windows” meant she was teaching him “you better check yourself again and do not fall in the same situation as your friend did”.

Traditional v. Modern Values

“If any man were to see you, you’d be done for, and so would your mother and father and your grandfather, the religious scholar-and I’d be done for more than anyone because it’s I who agreed to this and helped you.”

This line from “The Women’s Swimming Pool” makes a clear distinction that the obeying of traditional Islamic values was imperative for a young woman such as the narrator, who is presumed to be Hanan Al- Shaykh. Islamic traditions and customs were to be followed and it is evident from the very get-go when the narrator mentions the religious attire that she was obligated to wear. However, there is this constant mentioning of the narrator’s thirst and being overly hot. Consequently, she dreams of the vastness of the sea, which is symbolic of her yearning to rebel against the conservative Islamic values that she is expected to uphold. She asks herself: “What were its waters like? What color would they be now? If only this week would pass in a flash, for I had at last persuaded my grandmother to go down to Beirut and the sea…” The contrast between the views of her traditional grandmother and those of the people in the Westernized city of Beirut depicts the two conflicting world of the narrator.
For the entirety of the story, Hanan’s longing to assimilate to Western customs is prevalent. However, this all changes in the very last few lines. “For the first time her black dress looked shabby to me. I felt how far removed we were from these passers-by, from this street, this city, this sea.” After having embarked on this long journey to find the sea that she had dreamt of, the narrator did not come to the conclusion that Beruit was where she belonged. Instead, she comes to the realization that she is not currently a part of modern culture. Though she may be physically in the city of Beruit, Hanan is cognizant of the fact that, in the time being, the traditional values imposed upon her by her family are still a part of her.
The contrast of traditional values and Western values depicted in “The Women’s Swimming Pool” was a common theme in Eastern Literature. This was seen in Rabindranath Tagore’s “Punishment”. Tagore challenged the preconceived traditional belief of the time that men should overpower and control women. Similarly to Tagore’s writing, Hanan’s “The Women’s Swimming Pool” depicts this struggle and desire to dissent from what was expected of society.

Punished for Being a Woman

Nawal El Saadawi’s In Camera depicts a rebellious woman, Leila Al-Fargani, who was raped and tortured while in jail. Leila is on trial for expressing her beliefs on the unjust patriarchal society. El Saadawi, as an Egyptian feminist writer, portrays the lack of freedom women experience in Arab societies; she criticizes men, the judicial system, and figures of authority and the government.

Despite the cruel and obvious injustice the guards have committed, this trial brings shame upon Leila’s family. El Saadawi takes us into different points of views throughout the piece, one of them being her father. “Death was preferable for him and for her now” (1113). This portrays the higher importance of social reputation compared to the heroic actions of a female. Her father desires to express his pride for his daughter, but he is unable to due to fears of his dishonored reputation among the community. Leila was the victim, yet this society blames and dishonors her and her family for the loss of her virginity, which was deemed the most “valuable possession” by the ten guards.

Saadawi illustrates the oppressive and dehumanizing nature of society towards women with an extended animal metaphor. When Saadawi introduces the protagonists’ name, Saadawi only uses the past tense to emphasis the effect men have on women. “It was the name of a young woman named Leila, a young woman who had worn young woman’s clothes, had seen the sun and walked on two feet like other human beings… For a long time she’d been a small animal inside a dark and remote cave and when they addressed her, they only used animal names” (1108).Leila’s oppressors and guards stripped her of her identity, only referring to her as animal names. Principally, Saadawi portrays a young normal woman, but then the sentence quickly and shockingly transitions into a serious, dreadful tone. Leila compares herself to a small animal throughout the piece. After standing for an innumerable amount of time in jail, Leila seems to “resume her human form” after she sits down in a chair (El Saadawi 1106). She is infatuated with the chair, as it is her only sense of support both literally and metaphorically. Her identity has been reduced to nothing more than a nameless animal by the guards and society just because she was born a rebellious female.

Nawal El Saadawi’s In Camera aggressively calls attention to and condemns the domineering control men have over women in an Arab society. Saadawi creates a comparison between Leila and an animal to emphasize the abusive and dehumanizing treatment she received in jail for attempting to speak out against the government. The author also acknowledges the role of family and reputation in this society, depicting reputation as a higher priority than gender equality.

Two Sides of the Same Coin: A Reflection on Rich’s Poems

In her poem “Driving into the Wreak,” Adrienne Rich uses a lot of passionate imagery to describe a lonely character’s adventure under the sea. The words and phrases she choses to use are so descriptive and compelling that it makes the reader feel as if he or she is taking the dive themselves. In this poem, the third stanza really stood out to me and it goes, “I go down. Rung after rung and still the oxygen immerses me the blue light the clear atoms of our human air. I go down. My fliippers cripple me, I crawl like an insect down the ladder and there is no one to tell me when the ocean will begin.” I like Rich’s choice of diction when she says “immerse” because the word is generally used when describing things that are submerged in liquid. The word in this line makes it feel as if the diver is swimming in air. Now the lines following, “the blue light the clear atoms of our human air,” brings a sense of comfort and familiarity of the human world. This is a stark contrast to the when the diver is about to go under water where it says, “I go down. My flippers crippled me, I crawl like an insect down the ladder.” The phrases “cripple me” and “crawl like an insect” really emphasizes the awkwardness of moving from land to sea. It is evident that the diver naturally is not comfortable in the ocean world as he or she is in the human world.

Having read “A Room of Ones Own” it is clear that Virginia Woolf was a great inspiration to Rich. It seems to me that a lot of Woolf’s anger towards sexual difference in power influenced Rich’s perspective on the issue and manifested her own sense of anger. In “A Room of Ones Own,” Woolf says, “but it is obvious that the values of women differ very often from the values which have been made by the other sex; naturally, this is so. Yet it is the masculine values that prevail.” The ideas of gender roles and women’s inferiority are reoccurring themes throughout Rich’s poems. Take “From and Old House in America” for example. This is a story about a man and wife and their struggles during the western movement in the early 19th century. In the last two lines of part 5 it says, “or between man and woman in this savagely fathered and unmothered world.” What this is referring to are the sins of men for driving their masculinity and the sins of women for being passive to this force.

The best way I can describe Rich’s poetic style is super organized. “Driving into the Wreak” is neatly broken into stanza that are between 8-18 lines long; “Cartographies of Silence” and “From an Old House in America” are written in lines of pairs; and “Twenty One Love Poem” are actually twenty one difference love poems from I-XXI. Reflecting on “From an Old House in America,” I think Rich wrote this poem in lines of pairs to symbolize the equality that should be between a man and woman. Another neat thing that Rich does in “Driving into the Wreak” is that she uses a colon in line “I am she: I am he.” I believe she uses this punctuation to illustrate that there isn’t a definitive separation between man and woman but rather a balanced coexistence between the two sexes.

I would hardly count “Twenty One Love Poems” as actual love poems; they’re more like sad poem if you ask me. Instead of there being descriptions of passion, infatuation, and yearning these poems are filled with loneliness, helplessness, and violence. The first three lines really surprised me as it states, “Wherever in this city, screens flicker with pornography, with science-fiction vampires, victimized hirelings bending to the lash.” I couldn’t help but wonder how does “pornography” and “science-fiction vampires” relate to love? I suppose Twilight might be able to answer that one…

A major shift in personas occurs in Rich’s “Driving into the Wreak,” where it says, “This is the place. And I am here, the mermaid whose dark hair streams black, the merman in his armored body We circle silently about the wreak we dive into the hold. I am she: I am he.” It is quite confusing to understand but it seems to me that the diver has somehow become a mermaid slash merman during his/her time underwater. If you notice, the diver starts describing himself not as “I” but as “we”. Going back to the idea of gender equality, the diver is a representation of how man and woman are one.

Change

Adrienne Rich’s Twenty-One Love Poems is not your typical love poem, as the experience of pain, hardship, and loneliness between the two female lovers were mainly shown. Specifically in poem 14, Rich reveals the inability of the lesbian couple to show more of an intimate affection compared to the honeymoon couples. The honeymoon couples were “huddled in each other’s laps and arms”, while the speaker of the lesbian couple had “I put my hand on your thigh / to comfort both of us, your hand came over mine, / we stayed that way”. I believe the difference between the two different display of actions, and level of affection, shows the hardship of the lesbian couple; as their description of vomiting was not “as if all suffering were physical” but points to the emotional pain from the speaker’s inability to display the same level of intimacy of the honeymoon couple.

Considering the opposition of women in traditional discourse, and especially lesbian women, I believe Adrienne Rich not only wanted to highlight the troubles experienced by lesbian couples, but wanted to bring reform. In Poem 6, Rich shows her thoughts of reform as the speaker begins to describe her lover’s  hands, “Your small hands, precisely equal to my own”. Then afterwards says that, “in these hands / I could trust the world, or in many hands like these”. With these lines, Rich believed in women “handling power-tools or steering wheels”, hinting at the ability that women can hold positions of power, instead of men.

The idea of reform reoccurs in poem 18 and poem 21, when the speaker identified the moon, as “yet more than stone: / a woman”. I came to the conclusion that the “dawn / pushing toward daybreak. Something: a cleft of light?”  represented the unequal dominance of man over woman, and the division of light was man’s separation of women (in status and unorthodox love). And when the mood of the “cleft of light” suddenly shifts positively at the end, I believe Rich alluded the separation of women to be able to strengthen the idea of reform by coming together as “a figure of that light”.

A Progress of Female Role

The two sisters in Ama Ata Aidoo’s story have two different attitudes toward men and marriage. Connie is the older sister who has the traditional marital values in her mind. She is aware of her husband, James, “is running after a new girl” (997). “New” means it’s not the first time, but she chooses to cry all the time and insists that she loves her husband and she “is not interested in any other man”.(997) It’s the traditional point of view that when a woman marry a man, she is subject to keep the lifelong monogamous relationship. So she is loyal and obedient to her husband. But her younger sister, Mercy, thinks men have affairs with other girls because the women like her older sister “allow them to behave the way they do instead of seizing some freedom themselves”, (997) and she criticizes her older sister that “it’s women like you who keep all of us down”. (997) Mercy is young and beautiful, and has many pursuers. She is trying to seize some freedoms herself. She tires of doing her work and also doesn’t intent to be tied with a random fine man. Her sister thinks she should just marry a normal good man, but she chooses to get benefits from those old big men. She is going out with Mensar-Arthur, who is the Member of Parliament, old and rich, and have many wives and girlfriends. After the coup, Mensar-Arthur is in jail, and Mercy has affair with another married, old and rich public man-Captain Ashey.

Surprisingly, there seems only Connie is the one who thinks Mercy has relationship with these old and depraved public man is ruining herself. She knows their departed parents will not like to see it. The two rich and old public man have many wives and girlfriends mean there are many girls like Mercy, decides not to have the traditional way of marriage and pursuit material needs. Additionally, Connie’s husband, James, also thinks Connie should encourage Mercy to get benefits from the rich guy and hope to take some advantages from it. I think these show the society thought changes at that time in Ghana.

I don’t think Mercy represent a modern female image and I don’t agree what she does. But she represents a kind of sexual liberation at that time. It’s a significant progress to realize the equality of women and men. Men can have different wives and girlfriends, women can also choose men and get benefits from them. Fidelity is based on man and woman both loyal and equal to each other. Women like Mercy are no longer bounded and restricted by lifelong monogamous relationship. And they can choose their own partners. The development and changes of a relationship is also not effected by other people.

Shift from Local to Western Culture

I always thought Chinua Achebe was a novelist, not known for his short stories. This story in particular is the shortest one I ever read. In “Chike’s School Days” by Achebe, although it is about Chike it emphasizes more on the hardships his father Amos had to go through to the fortunate situation Chike is in now. I think he tries to fuse Chike with Western religion, culture and education to protect him from the ignorance of the Igbo tribe.Achebe’s quote at the beginning of the story “Chike was brought up” in the ways of the white man” which meant the opposite of traditional”(Achebe 827) emphasizes the needed to eradicate the old tradition of the Nigerians to the new Western culture.

Also, he was often critized for marrying an Osu (lowest ranking in the Igbo society). Amos didn’t see nothing wrong with it because through education and cultural diffusion he sees everyone equal.”an Osu child could even look down his nose at a free-born…..The white man had indeed accomplished many things”(Achebe 828), from the perspective of traditional ways people from higher ranking couldn’t marry an Osu, the quote reveals Amos glorifying the white man for bringing a sense of equality in his society.

Finally, during the mid 20th century the time Achebe wrote this story, religion was transitioning from old idol worshiping to Christianity. People tend to rely on their diviner and traditional ways of idol worships to solve situations. “Elizabeth appeared…. she had come to see him about.” Your son has joined the white man’s religion”(Achebe 828). This quote by the Diviner also suggest how fed up he is with the introduction of Christianity by the whites. All these phases of education, religion and cultural shifts show the effects of imperialism by the British years before Nigeria had independence. The local people at that time didn’t like it but when you look at Nigerian culture today, its a fusion of their tradition and some Western culture, religion and methods of education.