So, my post is about Candide but in two different occasions…
1) Candide, while a young man, has the mentality of a child. He trusts Pangloss and his theory that everything is for the best. I believe that this is incredibly naive and I have huge trouble understanding throughout the entire novel why he has the mentality especially in the very beginning (he’s exiled out of his home, he is taken as a slave, and he is constantly taken advantage of). It is because of this childish and naive mentality that I try to understand Candide’s casual behavior in regards in his killings.
2) I have read Candide before and I still don’t understand the reason why Candide WILLINGLY leaves El Dorado… El Dorado is symbolism for Paradise!!!!!! He had finally found the place that cannot be found and had access to untold riches and he leaves… I understand at this point that Candide will do whatever he can to get to Cunegonde, but leaving paradise was astonishing and kind of stunning as well.
I think these two scenes are important because these two scenes stick out the most to me. Candide’s behavior and actions show a very large contrast and it’s very shocking. I also find Candide’s disregard for El Dorado to be very startling. I try to understand why Voltaire would write a novel much like this one and I come up with a blank. I know this class is the consequences of enlightenment so I wonder what Candide’s reactions and behaviors would be like if he an actual professor who was actually knowledgeable in things that are really important instead of a made up subject and is actually a professor. I wish Candide grew up in an environment that would have helped him have common sense. His naivety is his biggest downfall. While one could argue that he has his happily ever after in a farm, it can be universally agreed that he would have been better off in the beginning if he understood that not everything is “for the best”. Even if he wasn’t educated very well, I just wished that he would have noticed what he had when he was in El Dorado. In this case, I believe that being “enlightened” would not have had a negative consequence…