Heroism

Throughout the course of the semester, we have encounter different epics and poems with similar themes such as Heroism. The Epic of Gilgamesh and Beowulf both bring into perspective the role of a heroic figure and the deeds that articulate and illustrate the heroic code. Despite being written centuries apart from one another, coming from different cultures and written in different style of writing, both of these literature pieces possess many similar heroic characteristics. Some of us may be wondering, how is Heroism described in these pieces of literature? What did Heroism mean to these different cultures? How does literature express the significance of Heroism?

In both texts Heroism is described as strength, courage and loyalty. Gilgamesh was known as the best of all ancient Mesopotamian heroes. He was the King of Uruk, represented as a brave and courageous warrior. Although Gilgamesh had a partner, one who acted as his voice of reasoning and although Gilgamesh went on into battle with all armors and weapons, he is still consider one of the best heroes. On the other hand, Beowulf is described as a perfect hero, someone who fought for his people and eliminated evil with his abilities to bring peace and justice. Beowulf always chose to fight without any weapons and only use his strength. Beowulf and Gilgamesh were remembered as glorious heroes. They both did great and daring things to achieve this. They were both in a position of high honor and power . Also, both heroes had won their battles in heroic and memorable ways. Gilgamesh and Beowulf are example of the significance of heroism expressed to literature and how that significance is still relevant today. They both reflect the expected characteristics of a good ruler. Do these characters mirror your perspective on how a heroic figure is? If not, how do they differ from your perspective?