Extra Credit

The beginning of the 1970’s brought emerging social movements. The largest of these was the Women’s Liberation Movement which fought for equal pay, better education, birth control and abortion rights for women. The 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe vs. Wade, legalized abortion., allowing women more options for dealing with unwanted pregnancies. Divorce laws were amended in many states, allowing women the ability to seek divorces and obtain spousal support. Women joined the workforce in huge numbers and  outnumbered men on college campuses.

Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique.

 “Just what was the problem that has no name? What were the words women used when they tried to express it? Sometimes a woman would say “I feel empty somehow . . . incomplete.” Or she would say, “I feel as if I don’t exist.” Sometimes…. “A tired feeling … I get so angry with the children it scares me. … I feel like crying without any reason.”

The quote shows that women were not satisfied with their role in society anymore and wanted more in life.  Women had a new life plan including not viewing housework as a career; not trying to find total fulfillment through marriage and motherhood alone; and finding meaningful work that uses the woman’s full mental capacity. Betty Friedman was among the women who took a step to bring about these changes to society. She wanted to give women the right to do anything they desired. She spoke for the whole female population and influenced them to change, therefore Howard Zinn included her in his writings.

American Indian Movement

The most surprising uprising of the 1970’s was the American Indian Movement(AIM). At the turn of the 20th century, American Indians organized in large numbers in the 70’s to address the wrongs done to them since the time of Columbus. In dramatic fashion, members of AIM occupied the former island prison of Alcatraz in 1969 to draw attention to their grievances against the American government.

Chief Luther Standing Bear, in his 1933 autobiography, From the Land of the Spotted Eagle, wrote:

 True, the white man brought great change. But the varied fruits of his civilization, though highly colored and inviting, are sickening and deadening. And if it be the part of civilization to maim, rob, and thwart, then what is progress?I am going to venture that the man who sat on the ground in his tipi meditating on life and its meaning, accepting- the kinship of all creatures, and acknowledging unity with the universe of things, was infusing into his being the true essence of civilization… .

For many Americans in the early twentieth century, the problems of Native Americans too often seemed distant. Luther Standing Bear was an advocate for reform in the United States government’s often neglectful policies toward Native Americans. Much of his writing addresses the inequities and injustices of a system that consigned Indians to life on reservations without adequate schools, housing, or medicine. A year after the publication of The Land of the Spotted Eagle, Congress passed the Indian Reorganization Act (1934), legislation designed to return to Native Americans control of reservation resources, reduce disproportionately high unemployment rates, and restore the administrative authority of individual tribes. Thus, Howard Zinn included him in his writings.

 

American Antihero: Glory or Gory?

In Taxi Driver, we see the crises of the American Male in the 70’s through the eyes of Travis Bickle. The idea of what a man is supposed to be changes in the 70’s. Many of these men were Vietnam war veterans, who returned home not to glory and adoration, but scorn and pity. This caused much distress for these men, whose ideals of what an American hero should be were being utterly erased from the American memory. Travis feels lost with no real identity, he is always on the outside looking in. This causes him to feel a true contempt for modern society, specifically in New York, for which he feels he does not participate in. Travis cannot idly sit by any longer and watch these events unfold, so he decides to take action in a negative way.

The turning point in the film, is when Travis shoots a man attempting to hold up a grocery store in his neighborhood. Travis felt as though he was doing a good deed, but it was not portrayed this way in the film. When watching the scene you feel extremely uneasy, and you find yourself question Travis and his intentions. Travis’ actions are not glorified here, but strewn with gore. Travis herein makes his transformation into the antihero of the film. Travis becomes increasingly violent and demented and his actions come to a head in one of the films final and bloodiest scenes in a ‘showdown’ style shootout. Instead of being celebrated, it is portrayed in an extremely disturbing manner, further instilling the idea of the antihero. Travis was a man with no direction, and when given no path you are often forced to forge your own. However, within the boundaries of an unstable mind, the path is bound to be twisted.

Extra Credit

“A few years ago I was suspended for three days from work because my children were still young and I had to take time off when they were sick. . . . They want people who keep quiet, squeal on one another, and are very good little robots. The fact that many have to take nerve pills before starting their day, and a week doesn’t go by that there aren’t two or three people who break down and cry, doesn’t mean a thing to them.“

in this quote, it shows that women didnt have any rights in workingplace, and according what she wrote on the newspaper, 90 percent of  the workers in her department were women ,but all the supervisors were men. as she said above, women were treated unfairly . she was suspended because she needed time to take care of her sick children. it is apprehensible thing in today’s society, however, at that time, she got suspended for three days. they wanted these feminine workers to work as robots which meant they didnt have freedom, didnt have break, didnt have rights that a worker should have. some of women cant give it no more, so they came up and tried to fight for their rights. when people grouped up, the power of them is marvellous.

“The law cannot do it for us. We must do it for ourselves. Women in this country must become revolutionaries. We must refuse to accept the old, the traditional roles and stereotypes…. We must replace the old, negative thoughts about our femininity with positive thoughts and positive action…”

this quote was said by Shirley Chisholm, a black congresswoman. this quote reflected that Shirley was kind disappointed to laws, because even the Equal Rights Amendent was passed by states, women still didnt really feel any changes on them.  they still cant do whatever they wanted to do, still were inferior to men. under the pressure of women being treated unequaly, Shirley decided to fight for themselves. Shirley thought that they need to take action on things rather than just speak out. action could change old, nagative thoughts and stereotypes quickly. they must do something to replace those old ideas and thoughts to bring out a new perspective of women.

 

 

The Radical 60’s

Betty Friedan (Women’s Liberation)

The 1950’s were a period in United Stated where gender roles were strictly and narrowly defined and anyone who broke those set definitions was regarded as strange and different. Women in that era were supposed to take care of their children and husband, cook food, and look beautiful. However, in the 1960’s a number of movements began to emerge and a number of women took on the task to expand the gender roles and give women the opportunity to do more with their lives than just staying home and taking care of the house. Betty Friedan wrote a book called The Feminine Mystique in which she talks about the ‘problem’ that every middle class woman faces but can not do anything about. In a quote from her book, Friedan writes,

The problem lay buried, unspoken for many years in the minds of American women. It was a strange stirring, -A sense of dissatisfaction, a yearning that women suffered in the middle of the twentieth century in the United States. Each suburban wife struggled with it alone. As she made the beds, shopped for groceries, matched slip-cover material, ate peanut butter sandwiches with her children, chauffeured Cub Scouts and Brownies, lay beside her husband at night-she was afraid to ask even of herself the silent question- “Is this all?”…

I think Zinn talks about Friedan because she served as a spokesperson for all the women that dreamt to achieve something in their lifetimes. She advocated that a woman’s role in society should not just be limited to making her family happy but she should be given the opportunity to discover herself and have a right to do “creative work of her own”.

Prisoners

The 1960’s were a time for change and as Women, Indians and Gay people fought for their rights, the prisoners too organized in an effort to bring change. Zinn includes prisoners because their story depicts how America treated its poor class during that time. Dostoevski once said: “The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.” America’s prisons were a place where the prisoners were provided with unbearable living conditions. A Walpole prisoner recalled the food as unbearable “with hundreds of cockroaches running away from the trays”. The poor were also more likely to get prisoned because they could not afford to hire expensive lawyers or to get bailed and the judges who were mostly orthodox white males tended to show little or no sympathy to the poor, homosexuals and the blacks etc. This all created a sense of resentment and hatred within the prisoners and finally led to a number of furious protests and revolutions. Another Walpole prisoner stated that, “Every program that we get is used as a weapon against us. The right to go to school, to go to church, to have visitors, to write, to go to the movies. They all end up being weapons of punishment. None of the programs are ours, Everything is treated as a privilege that can be taken away from us. The result is insecurity-a frustration that keeps eating away at you”

Therefore, it was not long before that the prisoners realized that their condition could only be ameliorated if they took the task upon themselves and resisted to the injustices done to them.

Overall both the women’s liberation movement and the Prisoner’s movement are examples of the circumstances that led America to become the radical and rebellious country that it was in the 1970’s and people finally realized that in order to achieve equality, they needed to break the narrow mindedness of the society and finally start looking beyond one’s color, gender or class.

 

Extra Credit: Sid Mills and Adrienne Rich

Sid Mills was a Native American who, for all intents and purposes to the U.S government was a protester first, and a Vietnam war veteran second.  Sid was arrested at Frank’s Landing in 1968 during a protest. He later made a statement in which he highlighted the lack of consideration and respect for Native American tribes, especially those which included veterans of the war. ‘we have already buried Indian fishermen returned dead from Vietnam, while Indian fishermen live here without protection and under steady attack…’ (493) He concluded his statement by saying that the indigenous people’s would fight for their rights. Zinn included this because this statement creates an opening for the topic of the Native American plight over the course of America’s short history. The native tribes have been fighting against the oppression of the white settlers for as long as the threat has posed itself. However, in more modern history, their fight has been a partially dormant conquest. The natives have been thought to be a nearly extinct peoples, without much claim left and a seemingly lost cause. This was not the case. The occupation of the village of Wounded Knee is but one example of the Native American resistance. Sid Mills brings light to the relentless disregard of Native Americans. Veteran’s of the war, whose ancestors homeland was invaded, have given their lives to this country are still left without protection. As Sid Mills stated ‘Just three years ago today, on October 13, 1965, 19 women and children were brutalized by more than 45 armed agents of the State of Washington at Frank’s Landing on the Nisqually river in a vicious, unwarranted attack. …’. The natives have made attempts to assimilate but they are still met without any real prominence in government standing. They are treated as outcasts, when they are factually more American, not less.

On the topic of women’s suffrage, a much more broad point was made through a woman named Adrienne Rich. Adrienne’s inclusion instills the argument that the control of women in society was not done directly by the state as with other oppressed people, but within the family, in their very homes. After women had gained the right to vote many years prior, there were no vital outstanding laws preventing women from proceeding as prominent members of society. Nearly any and all oppression was birthed within the walls of one’s own family. ‘the family was used-men to control women, women to control children, all to be preoccupied with one another, to turn to one another for help, to blame one another for trouble, to do violence to one another when tidings weren’t going right.’ Adrienne was a housewife fulfilling the ‘traditional’ tasks as a woman, completing her role. She questioned her doings, but was met with the answer ‘this is what women have always done’. Women’s liberation began with the women themselves, within their own bodies, as women’s bodies are the very base of their exploitation. The largest part of women’s suffrage and perhaps the most difficult was within the boundaries of the home. ‘They could revolutionize thought and behavior in exactly that seclusion of family privacy which the system had counted on to do its work of control and indoctrination. And together, instead of at odds-male, female, parents, children-they could undertake the changing of society itself’

 

Immoralities of President Nixon’s “Regime”

The shooting at Kent State (1970)

“When the national guardsmen got to the top of the hell all of a sudden there was just a quick movement , a flurry of activity, and then a crack or two cracks of rifle fire, and I thought, Oh my God! I turned and started running as fast as I could. I don’t think I got more than a step or two and all of a sudden I was on the ground. It was just like somebody had come over and given me a body blow and knocked me right down. The bullet had entered my left heel and had literally knocked me right down.”

-Tom Grace

As Tom grace describes the horrific events of Kent state shootings of innocent college students who were protesting against the Cambodian campaign by the President Nixon. This quote represents the immoral actions by the Nixon government. Government seems to care none for the people and rather was busy with re-electing the President. The Shootings were a result of Nixon’s Cambodian Campaign, and the victims were mostly the college students who were protesting against invasion of Cambodia.

Feeling of “alienated” and “disaffected”

The number of Americans feeling “alienated” and “disaffected” with the general state of the country climbed (from 29 percent in 1966) to over 50 percent. After Ford succeeded Nixon, the percentage of “alienated” was 55 percent. The survey showed that people were troubled most of all by inflation.

The instability of the world economy intensifies since 1973. As the world’s largest economies, the United States was gradually losing its advantage in the world economic hegemony. The significant price rising phenomenon appeared in the U.S., and inflation and unemployment rate were simultaneously growing. The stagflation crisis of 1973-1975 is the most typical one in the history. In the early Nixon administration, the U.S. government did not consider domestic economic policy as the key areas that governance should focus on. They think Inflation is a problem, but not the most worrying problem compares to others, nor the area to use the expense of other issues. In fact, unemployment hurts people a lot more seriously than inflation. The increasing of unemployment rate from 5.6% in 1974 to 8.3% in 1975 reflects the unemployed is more painful than the general view of rising prices. People are disaffected by this economic crisis; their standard of living were very low at that period of time.

Furthermore, energy crisis in 1973 the energy crisis made the situation out of control. The oil crisis happens so quick which are very rare; it hits the U.S. economy unusually heavy. According to Howard Zinn, Oil company economists discussed holding back production of oil to keep prices up. ARAMCO—the Arabian- American Oil Corporation, 75 percent of whose stock was held by American oil companies and 25 percent by Saudi Arabia—had made $1 profit on a barrel of oil in 1973. In 1974 it was making $4.50. Because of this, the inflation and unemployment are out of control. The number of unemployed people in the United States had reached the highest point since the Great Depression. After 1973, the price increase trend became steeper than before; food, fuel and medical care increase the price most dramatically. It seems the inflation will become more volatile, even more difficult to predict. I think Howard Zinn mention this to tell us why people are not satisfied with the economic situation during 1970s, and why people’s optimism for the future had changed significantly.

Loss Of Public Trust And Confidence

They gave information in judicial proceedings, to a Senate investigating committee, to the press. They implicated not only John Mitchell, but Robert Haldeman and John Ehrlichman, Nixon’s highest White House aides, and finally Richard Nixon himself-in not only the Watergate burglaries, but a whole series of illegal actions against political opponents and antiwar activists. Nixon and his aides lied again and again as they tried to cover up their involvement.

A grand jury in September indicted the Watergate burglars along with Howard Hunt and G. Gordon Liddy after the Watergate Scandal. They eventually released information on John Mitchell, Robert Haldeman and John Ehrlichman, Nixon’s highest White House aides, and finally Nixon. After the trial, it was disclosed that Nixon planned to give them leniency and up to a million dollars to keep them quiet. It was an unanticipated fall from presidency and the public had lost trust and confidence in the government. What was once a 60% favor for Nixon in 1972, now in 1973 led to Nixon’s impeachment and resignation in 1974. “Right now, 90% of Wall Street would cheer if Nixon resigns,” said a vice- president of Merrill Lynch Government Securities. This is significant because it shows the decrease in consumer satisfaction of many sectors, not simply the working class but also white collar workers. He was once revered and respected, but not his credibility dwindled as he had lied about his connection the burglars.

“Forced to death”

Tom Grace, The Shooting at Kent State (1970)

“He has very poor eyesight, and on glasses, and on May 4 he couldn’t get the gas mask on over his glasses, so he had to war the gas mask without glasses. He was blind as a bat without them, and he admitted he just knew he was shooting in a certain direction. That was a startling admission.  There was a guy out there who could hardly see, blasting away with an M-1.”

 

As Tom Grace who were one of the victim at the shooting remembers sending fairly blinded guardsman to the scene, I believe this statement is as shocking as the actual Kent State Shooting.  . This shows how little the government care about its citizens.  The government plan to draft young american to Cambodia without clear justification or explanation. Either we will be force to fight in Cambodia or be shoot to death if we were on their way. This is the moment we are out here by our own and  the Government is up their for their own profits. Talk about distrust and cynicism.

Nixon: Making or Breaking the 70’s?

Richard Nixon was the president of the United States throughout the early 1970’s and made a huge impact on the trust factor between the public and the government. Through investigation he was found to be in several situations involving corruption, greatly increasing the public mistrust in government. “On top of this came the political disgrace of the Nixon administration in the scandals that came to be known by the one-word label ‘Watergate,’ and which led to historic resignation from the presidency-the first in American history-of Richard Nixon in August 1974” (507). This quote basically gave an overview of both Nixon’s character and work ethic. Throughout his scandals he clearly demonstrated he had no regard for the level of respect between the people and the federal government nor did he care what impact his actions had on the country as a whole. Zinn mentions Nixon to demonstrate the level of confusion and mayhem within the country at this time, showing how even the leader of the country was one to not be trusted.