W3 – Internationalization: Scholar Vs. Student Exchanges

This reading starts out continuing the themes of the first half of the document and defining different types of internationalization policies.  It describes comprehensive internationalization strategies including internationalization at home which widens the outputs and impact of international education.  These strategies go beyond a singular focus on exchange and embrace a multi-faceted approach including creating partnerships and being prepared to welcome international students on many different levels.

The reading goes on to explain the difficulties in measuring the effectiveness of internationalization policies and concludes by examining factors that affect a policy’s success.  One part that I thought was really interesting was the fact that most policies focus on student mobility rather than scholar mobility.  The article made a good argument for the investment in and promotion of scholar exchanges.  For example, scholars usually stay at an institution for a longer time than students.  They also have the ability to impact hundreds or thousands of students through introducing new course material, sharing their firsthand cultural experiences, and promoting international study and travel.  Whereas students have a profound personal experience, professors can produce long-term direct and indirect impacts leading by example.

I am sure that policymakers are aware of the multiplier effect of scholar exchanges, so it got me thinking why so many programs focus on students.  As the article mentioned, funding is one of the main determinants of success of an exchange program.  Students may have a greater need for funding than established scholars.  Researchers could receive funding for a project they are working on abroad.  Professors may have the option to do a sabbatical abroad and still receive their full or partial salary.  In other words, scholars have more funding options for international exchanges that are outside of policies created by national governments, regional entities, and nongovernmental organizations.  Additionally, there are more students than scholars, so it makes sense that there are more programs aimed at them.  It would be interesting to see the percentage of students compared with the percentage of scholars that benefit from these internationalization policies.

There are numerous benefits to investing in student exchanges.  Traditionally aged students are at an age when they are often open to learning about different ways of life.  World Education Program, Australia states such individual benefits to students as increased acceptance and understanding, language skills, problem solving skills, personal growth and development, and interest in global issues (WEP 2016).  Although these can be personal gains, they are also attributes that create globally minded citizens that will go on to help society as a whole.

Focusing mostly on public diplomacy, the Fact Sheet released by the American Security Project, “Academic Exchange: A Pillar of American Public Diplomacy,” (2013) notes that government funded student changes are a crucial aspect of the US’s long-term, strategic relations with other countries.  It notes, “50 percent of the world’s population is younger than 30, constituting a significant potential audience. Building relationships with youth through exchange may pay dividends for the U.S. decades down the line as they assume leadership roles in their countries” (Trost and Wallin p 6).   The authors note that alumni of international exchange programs go on to hold leadership positions in their home governments and win Nobel Peace Prizes.  Although scholars can reach a wide audience, student exchange represents an investment in human capital for long-term benefits.  Both student and scholar exchanges are crucial to comprehensive, multi-faceted internationalization policies.

 

Sources:

Trost, K. and Wallin, M.  (2013).  Academic exchange: A pillar of American public diplomacy.  American Security Project.  Retrieved from: https://americansecurityproject.org/ASP%20Reports/Ref%200135%20-%20Academic%20Exchange%20-%20A%20Pillar%20of%20American%20Public%20Diplomacy.pdf.

WEP. (2016). Benefits of student exchange.  World Education Program, Australia.  Retrieved from: https://wep.org.au/student-exchange/benefits-of-student-exchange/.

W2 ACE Reading- Student Mobility

The policy category of Student Mobility was my favorite of the two covered in the ACE reading. The subcategories of Inbound and Outbound Mobility, Degree and Credit Mobility discuss the national polices implemented to further international higher education.

Visa policies are the first and foremost issue for inbound student mobility. The reading covers differing approaches, with Australia streamlining their application process, and efforts of the European Union to ease intra-EU mobility for non-EU students. However, we also have the United Kingdom increasing visa regulations in response to concerns about international students at public colleges.

How will the recent Paris terror attacks affect visa restrictions for international students?  France introduced new measures during the last few years aimed to increase inbound international students to 20% of total higher ed enrollment.  Have recent events made France reconsider this goal? This will be an issue to watch going forward, especially among nations they may consider to be ‘high risk’.

Another vital issue is that of ‘harmonization’, or alignment of educational systems. Differing academic calendars, credit systems and degree structures can inhibit student and job mobility.

I have seen harmonization issues in my workplace regarding graduate admissions qualifications. A four year Bachelors degree is required, meaning that students who completed their undergraduate studies in a country with a three year system were ineligible for our Masters programs. This issue of incohesive educational systems lost my school some talented applicants and left them with fewer options to further their studies.  ACE gives examples of successful harmonization initiatives such as the Bologna Process in Europe and the Reykjavik Declaration in Scandinavia, which provide common standards and mutual recognition of credentials.  Harmonization policies provide greater opportunities for students residing in participating regions. However I wonder if harmonization efforts put pressure on regions with fewer resources to conform to the standards set by wealthier regions. What disadvantages are faced by students in a region with a unique higher ed system that does not have the means to adapt to (often) Western standards? If higher education is to be truly global, what are the responsibilities of developed regions to the rest of the world?

 

Allison Olly