Toulmin Method Reflection

The Toulmin method is based around the application of critical thinking in a concise and detailed manner. This method shows how one should present his or her argument by breaking it into 6 different parts. The Toulmin method starts off with the traditional essay outline, starting with an early thesis, then building up on it using support from various sources. However, the Toulmin method also brings up new strategies which can help arguments become broader and well-rounded. I learned about how a warrant is essentially the undisclosed link between the claim and the evidence as this strategy explains why certain evidences support the assertion. Once the warrant is explained, the next step in this method is to back it up using additional evidence. I found this part interesting as it offers additional steps to render a deeper message in any argument. Although, the Toulmin method helped me seek for a deeper understanding from the text, I did have a difficult time applying it properly as I had trouble using all 6 parts in a clear manner. The step I found most difficult was the implementation of the qualifier. The qualifier was a difficult step as a first time user due to my lack of understanding on applying key words to show when and how a claim was true. I was ambivalent on where I had to implement this step in my writing. I also had a hard time backing up the warrant as I wasn’t sure which evidence provided the best support. In my opinion, I felt most comfortable using the Rhetorical context questions as it provided the fundamental parts needed for the argument. These fundamental questions were essentially the basis of all arguments and it provided the basic rules to help me expand thoughts in an analytical manner.